Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1544
Omonefe O Omofuma, Jennifer A Rusiecki, Jessica L Petrick, Roni T Falk, William Wheeler, Ruth M Pfeiffer, M Constanza Camargo, Michael B Cook
{"title":"Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository.","authors":"Omonefe O Omofuma, Jennifer A Rusiecki, Jessica L Petrick, Roni T Falk, William Wheeler, Ruth M Pfeiffer, M Constanza Camargo, Michael B Cook","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously identified associations of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) risk with four inflammation-related candidate biomarkers: TNFR2, IL17A, VEGFR3 and resistin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to replicate these candidates and discover novel associations with additional proteins. We conducted a nested case-control study of men with prediagnostic biospecimens stored at the US Department of Defense Serum Repository, including 203 incident EA cases. Controls were matched to cases in an ~2:1 ratio by date of birth, race, service branch, and blood draw date. Multiplex immunoassays (Olink/Proseek panels) measured 254 proteins detected in ≥10% of all samples. Multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression models calculated associations between biomarker quantiles and EA. P-values (<0.05) were used to indicate the statistical significance of candidates, and false discovery rate (FDR) was applied to the additional proteins. Odds ratios (ORs) from the current analysis and from previous studies were combined for the candidate markers using fixed effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the four candidates, the highest category of TNFR2 was associated with significantly increased EA risk (ORQ4vsQ1=1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.42). In the meta-analysis, associations with EA were positive for TNFR2 (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=2.04, 1.12-2.95) and inverse for IL17A (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=0.53, 0.26-0.80). Of the additional 250 proteins, 45 were associated with EA risk and 6 (MCP3, IL6, TNFR1, HGF, TFF3 and FURIN) remained significant after FDR correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed associations of TNFR2 and IL17A with EA risk. Additionally, our study expands the range of proteins associated with EA development.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This is the largest assessment of inflammation-related proteins with EA to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously identified associations of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) risk with four inflammation-related candidate biomarkers: TNFR2, IL17A, VEGFR3 and resistin.

Methods: We aimed to replicate these candidates and discover novel associations with additional proteins. We conducted a nested case-control study of men with prediagnostic biospecimens stored at the US Department of Defense Serum Repository, including 203 incident EA cases. Controls were matched to cases in an ~2:1 ratio by date of birth, race, service branch, and blood draw date. Multiplex immunoassays (Olink/Proseek panels) measured 254 proteins detected in ≥10% of all samples. Multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression models calculated associations between biomarker quantiles and EA. P-values (<0.05) were used to indicate the statistical significance of candidates, and false discovery rate (FDR) was applied to the additional proteins. Odds ratios (ORs) from the current analysis and from previous studies were combined for the candidate markers using fixed effects meta-analysis.

Results: Among the four candidates, the highest category of TNFR2 was associated with significantly increased EA risk (ORQ4vsQ1=1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.42). In the meta-analysis, associations with EA were positive for TNFR2 (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=2.04, 1.12-2.95) and inverse for IL17A (meta-analyzed ORhighest-vs-lowest=0.53, 0.26-0.80). Of the additional 250 proteins, 45 were associated with EA risk and 6 (MCP3, IL6, TNFR1, HGF, TFF3 and FURIN) remained significant after FDR correction.

Conclusions: We confirmed associations of TNFR2 and IL17A with EA risk. Additionally, our study expands the range of proteins associated with EA development.

Impact: This is the largest assessment of inflammation-related proteins with EA to date.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Racialized Economic Segregation, Treatment and Outcomes in Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository. Is metabolic syndrome a risk factor for skin cancer? A UKBiobank Observational and two Sample Mendelian randomization Study. The causal relationship between telomere length and cancer risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization. Optimizing Biomarker Models for Biologically Heterogeneous Cancers: A Nested Model Approach for Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1