Is metabolic syndrome a risk factor for skin cancer? A UKBiobank Observational and two Sample Mendelian randomization Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1388
Emily A M Black, Claudia Allemani, Tom Dudding
{"title":"Is metabolic syndrome a risk factor for skin cancer? A UKBiobank Observational and two Sample Mendelian randomization Study.","authors":"Emily A M Black, Claudia Allemani, Tom Dudding","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin cancers (SCs) are the third most common cancer worldwide, with incidence increasing. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities strongly associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. More than 1 in 5 individuals have MetS and it is linked with at least 14 different cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether MetS is a risk factor for SC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted in UK Biobank. The association between MetS and SC was investigated using multivariable Poisson regression. To investigate causality, a two sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted using summary level Genome-wide association study data from UK Biobank (MetS) and FinnGen (SC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>467,919 participants were included, 26.7% had MetS. Follow-up was for up to 10.8 years. MetS showed a moderately sized protective effect on BCC while the effect for SCC and MM crossed the null. Overall, MR found there was some weak evidence for increase odds of SC in those with MetS (1.07 (OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.14)). Conclusions= The observational study identifies a moderately sized protective effect of MetS on BCC with MR evidence suggesting a weak causal effect is in the opposite direction.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study has found little to no effect of MetS on SC, despite links between MetS and at least 14 other cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin cancers (SCs) are the third most common cancer worldwide, with incidence increasing. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities strongly associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. More than 1 in 5 individuals have MetS and it is linked with at least 14 different cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether MetS is a risk factor for SC.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in UK Biobank. The association between MetS and SC was investigated using multivariable Poisson regression. To investigate causality, a two sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted using summary level Genome-wide association study data from UK Biobank (MetS) and FinnGen (SC).

Results: 467,919 participants were included, 26.7% had MetS. Follow-up was for up to 10.8 years. MetS showed a moderately sized protective effect on BCC while the effect for SCC and MM crossed the null. Overall, MR found there was some weak evidence for increase odds of SC in those with MetS (1.07 (OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.14)). Conclusions= The observational study identifies a moderately sized protective effect of MetS on BCC with MR evidence suggesting a weak causal effect is in the opposite direction.

Impact: This study has found little to no effect of MetS on SC, despite links between MetS and at least 14 other cancers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:皮肤癌(SC)是全球第三大常见癌症,而且发病率还在不断上升。代谢综合征(MetS)是一组与心血管疾病发展密切相关的代谢异常。每 5 个人中就有超过 1 人患有代谢综合征,它与至少 14 种不同的癌症有关。本研究旨在调查 MetS 是否是 SC 的风险因素:方法:在英国生物库中进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。方法:在英国生物库中进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,采用多变量泊松回归法研究 MetS 与 SC 之间的关系。为研究因果关系,利用英国生物库(MetS)和芬兰基因(SC)的全基因组关联研究数据,进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究:共纳入 467 919 名参与者,其中 26.7% 患有 MetS。随访时间长达 10.8 年。MetS对BCC有中等程度的保护作用,而对SCC和MM的作用则不明显。总体而言,MR发现有微弱证据表明,MetS患者患SCC的几率增加(1.07 (OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.14))。结论= 该观察性研究发现,MetS对BCC具有中等程度的保护作用,而MR证据则表明,MetS对BCC具有微弱的反向因果效应:影响:尽管 MetS 与至少 14 种其他癌症存在联系,但这项研究发现 MetS 对 SC 几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Racialized Economic Segregation, Treatment and Outcomes in Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Circulating Inflammation Biomarkers and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Nested Case-control Study in the Department of Defense Serum Repository. Is metabolic syndrome a risk factor for skin cancer? A UKBiobank Observational and two Sample Mendelian randomization Study. The causal relationship between telomere length and cancer risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization. Optimizing Biomarker Models for Biologically Heterogeneous Cancers: A Nested Model Approach for Lung Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1