The comparison of gut microbiota between different types of epilepsy in children.

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Microbial Cell Factories Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1186/s12934-025-02684-2
Siwei Fang, Nanfei Hu, Changci Zhou, Jiajia You, Liwen Wu, Xiongfeng Pan, Zhenghui Xiao, Jun Qiu
{"title":"The comparison of gut microbiota between different types of epilepsy in children.","authors":"Siwei Fang, Nanfei Hu, Changci Zhou, Jiajia You, Liwen Wu, Xiongfeng Pan, Zhenghui Xiao, Jun Qiu","doi":"10.1186/s12934-025-02684-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand the variations in gut microbiota in children with different types of epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven children with epilepsy were included in the case group, which was further divided into focal (group A, n = 28) and generalized epilepsy groups (group B, n = 9) based on the origin and extent of the seizures. The focal epilepsy group was subdivided into the benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECT) (group C, n = 9) and non-BECT groups (group D, n = 19) based on the appearance of typical centrotemporal spikes or spike-wave complexes on the electroencephalogram (EEG). Additionally, 14 healthy children were selected as the control group (group E, n = 14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota between the case and control groups. At the genus level, the abundance of Megamonas (P = 0.001), Streptococcus (P<0.001), Romboutsia (P = 0.001), Bacteroides (P<0.05), and Escherichia/Shigella (P<0.05) was significantly higher in the focal epilepsy group than in the control group (0.027 vs. 0.00009, P = 0.001; 0.016 vs. 0.002, P<0.001; 0.013 vs. 0.002, P = 0.001; 0.030 vs. 0.002, P<0.05, respectively). Additionally, Escherichia/Shigella (P<0.05) was more abundant in the case group compared to the control group (0.033 vs. 0.002, P<0.05). Bacteroides (P<0.05) was more abundant in the control group than in the case group. Megamonas (P<0.001) and Collinsella (P<0.05) were significantly more prevalent in the BECT group than in the control group (0.034 vs. 0.00009, P<0.001; 0.014 vs. 0.001, P<0.05, respectively). In the non-BECT group, compared to the control group, Megamonas (P = 0.013), Streptococcus (P<0.001), Romboutsia (P = 0.001), and Escherichia/Shigella (P<0.05) were found in greater abundance (0.023 vs. 0.00009, P = 0.013; 0.018 vs. 0.002, P<0.001; 0.014 vs. 0.002, P = 0.001; 0.037 vs. 0.002, P<0.05, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though, there were no statistically significant differences in gut microbiota between the different types of epilepsy, the gut microbiota of children with epilepsy significantly differed from that of healthy controls. The increased abundance of Escherichia/Shigella may lead to the worsening of clinical phenotypes and poor prognosis, and it could be a candidate biomarker to identify the focal epilepsy or even non-benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, potentially providing new therapeutic targets for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":18582,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Cell Factories","volume":"24 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Cell Factories","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-025-02684-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To better understand the variations in gut microbiota in children with different types of epilepsy.

Methods: Thirty-seven children with epilepsy were included in the case group, which was further divided into focal (group A, n = 28) and generalized epilepsy groups (group B, n = 9) based on the origin and extent of the seizures. The focal epilepsy group was subdivided into the benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECT) (group C, n = 9) and non-BECT groups (group D, n = 19) based on the appearance of typical centrotemporal spikes or spike-wave complexes on the electroencephalogram (EEG). Additionally, 14 healthy children were selected as the control group (group E, n = 14).

Results: Significant differences were observed in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota between the case and control groups. At the genus level, the abundance of Megamonas (P = 0.001), Streptococcus (P<0.001), Romboutsia (P = 0.001), Bacteroides (P<0.05), and Escherichia/Shigella (P<0.05) was significantly higher in the focal epilepsy group than in the control group (0.027 vs. 0.00009, P = 0.001; 0.016 vs. 0.002, P<0.001; 0.013 vs. 0.002, P = 0.001; 0.030 vs. 0.002, P<0.05, respectively). Additionally, Escherichia/Shigella (P<0.05) was more abundant in the case group compared to the control group (0.033 vs. 0.002, P<0.05). Bacteroides (P<0.05) was more abundant in the control group than in the case group. Megamonas (P<0.001) and Collinsella (P<0.05) were significantly more prevalent in the BECT group than in the control group (0.034 vs. 0.00009, P<0.001; 0.014 vs. 0.001, P<0.05, respectively). In the non-BECT group, compared to the control group, Megamonas (P = 0.013), Streptococcus (P<0.001), Romboutsia (P = 0.001), and Escherichia/Shigella (P<0.05) were found in greater abundance (0.023 vs. 0.00009, P = 0.013; 0.018 vs. 0.002, P<0.001; 0.014 vs. 0.002, P = 0.001; 0.037 vs. 0.002, P<0.05, respectively).

Conclusions: Though, there were no statistically significant differences in gut microbiota between the different types of epilepsy, the gut microbiota of children with epilepsy significantly differed from that of healthy controls. The increased abundance of Escherichia/Shigella may lead to the worsening of clinical phenotypes and poor prognosis, and it could be a candidate biomarker to identify the focal epilepsy or even non-benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, potentially providing new therapeutic targets for the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial Cell Factories
Microbial Cell Factories 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
235
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Microbial Cell Factories is an open access peer-reviewed journal that covers any topic related to the development, use and investigation of microbial cells as producers of recombinant proteins and natural products, or as catalyzers of biological transformations of industrial interest. Microbial Cell Factories is the world leading, primary research journal fully focusing on Applied Microbiology. The journal is divided into the following editorial sections: -Metabolic engineering -Synthetic biology -Whole-cell biocatalysis -Microbial regulations -Recombinant protein production/bioprocessing -Production of natural compounds -Systems biology of cell factories -Microbial production processes -Cell-free systems
期刊最新文献
Development of an efficient expression system for human chaperone BiP in Pichia pastoris: production optimization and functional validation. Acetol biosynthesis enables NADPH balance during nitrogen limitation in engineered Escherichia coli. The comparison of gut microbiota between different types of epilepsy in children. Bioremediation of non-point hydrogen sulfide emissions using bacterial cellulose/activated carbon membrane. ATP deficiency triggers ganoderic acids accumulation via fatty acid β-oxidation pathway in Ganoderma lucidum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1