Feature selection methods affect the performance of scRNA-seq data integration and querying

IF 32.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Nature Methods Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1038/s41592-025-02624-3
Luke Zappia, Sabrina Richter, Ciro Ramírez-Suástegui, Raphael Kfuri-Rubens, Larsen Vornholz, Weixu Wang, Oliver Dietrich, Amit Frishberg, Malte D. Luecken, Fabian J. Theis
{"title":"Feature selection methods affect the performance of scRNA-seq data integration and querying","authors":"Luke Zappia, Sabrina Richter, Ciro Ramírez-Suástegui, Raphael Kfuri-Rubens, Larsen Vornholz, Weixu Wang, Oliver Dietrich, Amit Frishberg, Malte D. Luecken, Fabian J. Theis","doi":"10.1038/s41592-025-02624-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of single-cell transcriptomics has allowed the construction of reference cell atlases, but their usefulness depends on the quality of dataset integration and the ability to map new samples. Previous benchmarks have compared integration methods and suggest that feature selection improves performance but have not explored how best to select features. Here, we benchmark feature selection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing integration using metrics beyond batch correction and preservation of biological variation to assess query mapping, label transfer and the detection of unseen populations. We reinforce common practice by showing that highly variable feature selection is effective for producing high-quality integrations and provide further guidance on the effect of the number of features selected, batch-aware feature selection, lineage-specific feature selection and integration and the interaction between feature selection and integration models. These results are informative for analysts working on large-scale tissue atlases, using atlases or integrating their own data to tackle specific biological questions. This Registered Report presents a benchmarking study evaluating the impact of feature selection on scRNA-seq integration.","PeriodicalId":18981,"journal":{"name":"Nature Methods","volume":"22 4","pages":"834-844"},"PeriodicalIF":32.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-025-02624-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The availability of single-cell transcriptomics has allowed the construction of reference cell atlases, but their usefulness depends on the quality of dataset integration and the ability to map new samples. Previous benchmarks have compared integration methods and suggest that feature selection improves performance but have not explored how best to select features. Here, we benchmark feature selection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing integration using metrics beyond batch correction and preservation of biological variation to assess query mapping, label transfer and the detection of unseen populations. We reinforce common practice by showing that highly variable feature selection is effective for producing high-quality integrations and provide further guidance on the effect of the number of features selected, batch-aware feature selection, lineage-specific feature selection and integration and the interaction between feature selection and integration models. These results are informative for analysts working on large-scale tissue atlases, using atlases or integrating their own data to tackle specific biological questions. This Registered Report presents a benchmarking study evaluating the impact of feature selection on scRNA-seq integration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特征选择方法影响着scRNA-seq数据集成和查询的性能。
单细胞转录组学的可用性使参考细胞图谱的构建成为可能,但它们的有用性取决于数据集整合的质量和绘制新样本的能力。以前的基准测试比较了集成方法,并提出特征选择可以提高性能,但没有探索如何最好地选择特征。在这里,我们对单细胞RNA测序整合的特征选择方法进行基准测试,使用批量校正和生物变异保存之外的指标来评估查询映射、标签转移和未见群体的检测。我们通过展示高度可变的特征选择对于产生高质量的集成是有效的,并进一步指导所选择的特征数量、批次感知特征选择、特定于谱系的特征选择和集成以及特征选择和集成模型之间的相互作用。这些结果对从事大规模组织地图集工作的分析人员,使用地图集或整合他们自己的数据来解决特定的生物学问题提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Methods
Nature Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
58.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Methods is a monthly journal that focuses on publishing innovative methods and substantial enhancements to fundamental life sciences research techniques. Geared towards a diverse, interdisciplinary readership of researchers in academia and industry engaged in laboratory work, the journal offers new tools for research and emphasizes the immediate practical significance of the featured work. It publishes primary research papers and reviews recent technical and methodological advancements, with a particular interest in primary methods papers relevant to the biological and biomedical sciences. This includes methods rooted in chemistry with practical applications for studying biological problems.
期刊最新文献
CellVoyager: AI CompBio agent generates new insights by autonomously analyzing biological data. Pushing the boundaries of autonomous biological discovery. stVCR: spatiotemporal dynamics of single cells An update on spatial proteomics Long-lived retinal ganglion cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1