Misprediction Sensitivity Is Diminished for Action-effects Resulting from Stimulus-driven Movement.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02321
Anthony W Harrison, Bruce K Christensen, Thomas J Whitford
{"title":"Misprediction Sensitivity Is Diminished for Action-effects Resulting from Stimulus-driven Movement.","authors":"Anthony W Harrison, Bruce K Christensen, Thomas J Whitford","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While volitional movement is thought to be initiated based on its anticipated capacity to achieve sensory goals, stimulus-driven movement may be generated with less regard for its specific effects. Sensorimotor processes that make use of action-effect predictions may therefore differ between these forms of movement, including sensory attenuation and the detection of mispredicted motor effects. In this study, we explored sensory attenuation by comparing the evoked response of externally-generated tones with those produced by participants (n = 61), both according to their own timing (i.e., volitionally) and in response to simple visual cues (i.e., stimulus-driven). The influence of stimulus identity prediction (i.e., the predictability of tone frequency) on N1 amplitudes was not found to differ between self- and externally-generated stimuli, or on the basis of volitional control. Reduced P2 amplitudes were observed in response to self-generated tones, which may suggest that these were subject to higher levels of attentional control, including processes involved in the termination of attention. To explore misprediction sensitivity, we compared the influence of stimulus identity prediction on N2b component amplitudes. A significant interaction was found to reflect heightened sensitivity to mispredicted outcomes of volitional action, compared with those of stimulus-driven movement. In light of recent evidence that attentional suppression may attenuate the primary cortical response to outcomes of stimulus-driven movement, we propose that this mechanism might also serve to diminish misprediction sensitivity. As such, these effects may represent important features of sensorimotor processing that assist in differentiating stimuli on the basis of self-generation and intentionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1431-1448"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While volitional movement is thought to be initiated based on its anticipated capacity to achieve sensory goals, stimulus-driven movement may be generated with less regard for its specific effects. Sensorimotor processes that make use of action-effect predictions may therefore differ between these forms of movement, including sensory attenuation and the detection of mispredicted motor effects. In this study, we explored sensory attenuation by comparing the evoked response of externally-generated tones with those produced by participants (n = 61), both according to their own timing (i.e., volitionally) and in response to simple visual cues (i.e., stimulus-driven). The influence of stimulus identity prediction (i.e., the predictability of tone frequency) on N1 amplitudes was not found to differ between self- and externally-generated stimuli, or on the basis of volitional control. Reduced P2 amplitudes were observed in response to self-generated tones, which may suggest that these were subject to higher levels of attentional control, including processes involved in the termination of attention. To explore misprediction sensitivity, we compared the influence of stimulus identity prediction on N2b component amplitudes. A significant interaction was found to reflect heightened sensitivity to mispredicted outcomes of volitional action, compared with those of stimulus-driven movement. In light of recent evidence that attentional suppression may attenuate the primary cortical response to outcomes of stimulus-driven movement, we propose that this mechanism might also serve to diminish misprediction sensitivity. As such, these effects may represent important features of sensorimotor processing that assist in differentiating stimuli on the basis of self-generation and intentionality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意志和刺激驱动运动的动作效应预测:研究感觉衰减和错误预测敏感性。
虽然意志运动被认为是基于其预期的实现感官目标的能力而启动的,但刺激驱动的运动可能较少考虑其具体效果。因此,利用动作效应预测的感觉运动过程可能在这些运动形式之间有所不同,包括感觉衰减和对错误预测的运动效应的检测。在这项研究中,我们通过比较外部产生的音调与参与者产生的音调(n = 61)的诱发反应来探索感官衰减,这两种反应都是根据他们自己的时间(即自愿)和对简单视觉线索(即刺激驱动)的反应。刺激同一性预测(即音调频率的可预测性)对N1振幅的影响在自我和外部刺激之间或在意志控制的基础上没有发现差异。在自我产生音调的反应中,观察到P2振幅降低,这可能表明这些声音受到更高水平的注意力控制,包括涉及注意力终止的过程。为了探究错误预测的敏感性,我们比较了刺激同一性预测对N2b分量振幅的影响。与刺激驱动的运动相比,一个重要的相互作用反映了对意志行动的错误预测结果的高度敏感性。鉴于最近的证据表明,注意抑制可能会减弱皮层对刺激驱动运动结果的主要反应,我们提出这种机制也可能有助于降低错误预测的敏感性。因此,这些效应可能代表了感觉运动加工的重要特征,有助于在自我产生和意向性的基础上区分刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
期刊最新文献
Visual Simulation Is Supported by Sequential Monitoring in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex. Independent Markers of Attentional Shifts. Neural Signatures of Flexible Temporal Orienting under Spatial and Motor Uncertainty. Synergistic Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity Mechanisms for Working Memory. Retinotopic Spatial Working Memory Representations Are Not Affected by Task-irrelevant Visual Stimuli.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1