Personality preferences and stress perception among nursing students in different nursing programmes: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06960-y
Yuh-Shiow Li, Hui-Chen Tseng, Bao-Huan Yang, Mary Etta C Mills, Wen-Pin Yu
{"title":"Personality preferences and stress perception among nursing students in different nursing programmes: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yuh-Shiow Li, Hui-Chen Tseng, Bao-Huan Yang, Mary Etta C Mills, Wen-Pin Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06960-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding personality preferences is crucial for guiding healthcare education and the stress management strategies of nursing students. While stress in nursing education has been well studied, its relationship with personality preferences, particularly in clinical settings, has been underexplored. This study aims to investigate the relationship between personality preferences and stress perception among nursing students in three different nursing programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited 780 nursing students. We used structured questionnaires to collect data on demographics, personality preferences, and stress perception. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was used to measure personality preferences across four dimensions: extraversion/introversion, sensing/intuition, thinking/feeling, and judging/perceiving. The Chinese version of the MBTI and the Nurse Stress Checklist were also employed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and independent t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three common personality preferences were identified: extraversion, intuition, feeling, and perceiving; introversion, sensing, thinking, and judging; and introversion, sensing, feeling, and judging. The findings indicate that stress was significantly related to personality preferences. There were significant differences in the stress scores and the extraversion/introversion and thinking/feeling subscales. However, no significant differences in stress levels were observed across different nursing programmes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each personality trait exhibited specific stress coping mechanisms. Addressing students' stress is crucial because it can lead to academic burnout and attrition. This study's findings can inform strategies to reduce stress while accommodating students' personality traits, ultimately enhancing student success in nursing programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06960-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding personality preferences is crucial for guiding healthcare education and the stress management strategies of nursing students. While stress in nursing education has been well studied, its relationship with personality preferences, particularly in clinical settings, has been underexplored. This study aims to investigate the relationship between personality preferences and stress perception among nursing students in three different nursing programmes.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 780 nursing students. We used structured questionnaires to collect data on demographics, personality preferences, and stress perception. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was used to measure personality preferences across four dimensions: extraversion/introversion, sensing/intuition, thinking/feeling, and judging/perceiving. The Chinese version of the MBTI and the Nurse Stress Checklist were also employed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and independent t-tests.

Results: Three common personality preferences were identified: extraversion, intuition, feeling, and perceiving; introversion, sensing, thinking, and judging; and introversion, sensing, feeling, and judging. The findings indicate that stress was significantly related to personality preferences. There were significant differences in the stress scores and the extraversion/introversion and thinking/feeling subscales. However, no significant differences in stress levels were observed across different nursing programmes.

Conclusions: Each personality trait exhibited specific stress coping mechanisms. Addressing students' stress is crucial because it can lead to academic burnout and attrition. This study's findings can inform strategies to reduce stress while accommodating students' personality traits, ultimately enhancing student success in nursing programmes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同护理专业护生的个性偏好与压力感知:一项横断面研究。
背景:了解人格偏好对指导护生的健康教育和压力管理策略具有重要意义。虽然护理教育中的压力已经得到了很好的研究,但其与人格偏好的关系,特别是在临床环境中,尚未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在探讨三种不同护理专业护生的人格偏好与压力知觉的关系。方法:采用横断面研究方法招募780名护生。我们使用结构化问卷来收集人口统计、个性偏好和压力感知方面的数据。迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)用于测量四个维度的人格偏好:外向/内向、感觉/直觉、思考/感觉和判断/感知。同时采用中文版MBTI和护士压力量表。统计分析包括描述性统计、单因素方差分析和独立t检验。结果:确定了三种常见的人格偏好:外向性、直觉性、感觉性和感知性;内向、感觉、思考和判断;以及内向,感知,感觉和判断。研究结果表明,压力与个性偏好显著相关。在压力得分、外向/内向和思考/感觉分量表上存在显著差异。然而,在不同的护理方案中,没有观察到压力水平的显著差异。结论:各人格特质表现出不同的应激应对机制。解决学生的压力是至关重要的,因为它会导致学业倦怠和损耗。这项研究的发现可以为减轻压力的策略提供信息,同时适应学生的个性特征,最终提高学生在护理课程中的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing cardiopulmonary physiotherapy education with an AI-driven Smart Learning Platform: a quasi-experimental study. Prevalence of professional fulfillment, and intention to leave and its risk factors among academic physicians at Ain Shams University, Egypt. Self-directed teaching system driven by video analysis feedback improves surgical skill training for clinical interns: a randomized controlled trial. Simulation-based learning enhances interprofessional competencies in undergraduate health students: a retrospective pre-post study. Application of Mini-CEX combined with student-standardized patients in rehabilitation medicine residents' standardized training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1