Key Findings and Recommendations from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Quality Survey of U.S. Pharmacy School Faculty.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101391
M O Faruk Khan, Mohamed Rashrash, Suhila Sawesi, Fatma Anam
{"title":"Key Findings and Recommendations from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Quality Survey of U.S. Pharmacy School Faculty.","authors":"M O Faruk Khan, Mohamed Rashrash, Suhila Sawesi, Fatma Anam","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the faculty perspectives on how well pharmacy programs achieve key areas in the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) faculty survey, including administration, governance, faculty development, infrastructure, curriculum, teaching, and student supervision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AACP Curriculum Quality Survey (CQS) data from 2016 - 2023 were analyzed. The survey included 40 Likert-scale questions (1-5: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Questions were categorized into themes: organizational structure, administration, faculty support, curriculum, and resources. Responses for Agree and Strongly Agree were combined to report the overall agreement levels. An Independent Samples t-test compared the mean agreement levels between the private and public institutions, and trend analysis was conducted for each item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faculty agreements ranged from 49.8 ± 2.5% to 94.8 ± 0.7% in public and 56.2 ± 2.3% to 95.8 ± 0.7% in private institutions. Private institutions exhibited statistically significant higher agreements than public institutions in faculty development, while public institutions exhibited statistically significant higher agreements in resources, infrastructure, professionalism, and culture CONCLUSIONS: Faculty concerns include leadership, resource allocation, and professional development across public and private institutions. Recommendations include strengthening cultural competency training, leadership, governance, faculty recruitment, emerging technologies, and interprofessional education. Although based on the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016, these analyses remain relevant to ACPE Standards 2025, which fully incorporate the earlier standards in a reorganized format.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the faculty perspectives on how well pharmacy programs achieve key areas in the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) faculty survey, including administration, governance, faculty development, infrastructure, curriculum, teaching, and student supervision.

Methods: AACP Curriculum Quality Survey (CQS) data from 2016 - 2023 were analyzed. The survey included 40 Likert-scale questions (1-5: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Questions were categorized into themes: organizational structure, administration, faculty support, curriculum, and resources. Responses for Agree and Strongly Agree were combined to report the overall agreement levels. An Independent Samples t-test compared the mean agreement levels between the private and public institutions, and trend analysis was conducted for each item.

Results: Faculty agreements ranged from 49.8 ± 2.5% to 94.8 ± 0.7% in public and 56.2 ± 2.3% to 95.8 ± 0.7% in private institutions. Private institutions exhibited statistically significant higher agreements than public institutions in faculty development, while public institutions exhibited statistically significant higher agreements in resources, infrastructure, professionalism, and culture CONCLUSIONS: Faculty concerns include leadership, resource allocation, and professional development across public and private institutions. Recommendations include strengthening cultural competency training, leadership, governance, faculty recruitment, emerging technologies, and interprofessional education. Although based on the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016, these analyses remain relevant to ACPE Standards 2025, which fully incorporate the earlier standards in a reorganized format.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Optical properties of transparent nanocrystalline yttria stabilized zirconia
IF 3.9 3区 材料科学Optical MaterialsPub Date : 2009-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2009.06.004
J.E. Alaniz, F.G. Perez-Gutierrez, G. Aguilar, J.E. Garay
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Academic Writers: The Role of a Writing Retreat and Social Cognitive Theory. Improving the Effectiveness of Workplace-based Assessment for Pharmacy Interns, An Evaluation Study. Impact of a Modular Bridge Course for First-Year Pharmacy Students. Pharmaceutical Education in LGBTQIA+ Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Educational Strategies and Barriers. Key Findings and Recommendations from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Quality Survey of U.S. Pharmacy School Faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1