Exploring the Use of a Large Language Model for Inductive Content Analysis in a Discourse Network Analysis Study

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Social Science Computer Review Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1177/08944393251326175
Steve Randerson, Thomas Graydon-Guy, En-Yi Lin, Sally Casswell
{"title":"Exploring the Use of a Large Language Model for Inductive Content Analysis in a Discourse Network Analysis Study","authors":"Steve Randerson, Thomas Graydon-Guy, En-Yi Lin, Sally Casswell","doi":"10.1177/08944393251326175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large language models show promising capability in some qualitative content analysis tasks; however, research reporting their performance in identifying initial codes that underpin subsequent analysis is scarce. This paper explores the suitability of GPT-4 to assist in building a codebook for a discourse network analysis (DNA) of a recent alcohol policy reform. DNA is a codebook-driven approach to identifying groupings of actors who use similar policy framings. The paper uses GPT-4 to identify initial codes (‘concepts’) and related quotes in 108 news articles and interviews. The results produced by GPT-4 are compared to a codebook prepared by researchers. GPT-4 identified over two-thirds of the concepts found by the researchers, and it was highly accurate in screening out a large volume of irrelevant media items. However, GPT-4 also provided many irrelevant concepts that required researcher review and removal. The discussion reflects on the implications for using GPT-4 in codebook preparation for DNA and other situations, including the need for human involvement and sample testing to understand its strengths and limitations, which may limit efficiency gains.","PeriodicalId":49509,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Computer Review","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Computer Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251326175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large language models show promising capability in some qualitative content analysis tasks; however, research reporting their performance in identifying initial codes that underpin subsequent analysis is scarce. This paper explores the suitability of GPT-4 to assist in building a codebook for a discourse network analysis (DNA) of a recent alcohol policy reform. DNA is a codebook-driven approach to identifying groupings of actors who use similar policy framings. The paper uses GPT-4 to identify initial codes (‘concepts’) and related quotes in 108 news articles and interviews. The results produced by GPT-4 are compared to a codebook prepared by researchers. GPT-4 identified over two-thirds of the concepts found by the researchers, and it was highly accurate in screening out a large volume of irrelevant media items. However, GPT-4 also provided many irrelevant concepts that required researcher review and removal. The discussion reflects on the implications for using GPT-4 in codebook preparation for DNA and other situations, including the need for human involvement and sample testing to understand its strengths and limitations, which may limit efficiency gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大语言模型在语篇网络分析研究中的应用探讨
大型语言模型在一些定性内容分析任务中显示出良好的能力;然而,报告它们在识别支撑后续分析的初始代码方面的表现的研究很少。本文探讨了GPT-4的适用性,以协助建立一个密码本的话语网络分析(DNA)最近的酒精政策改革。DNA是一种代码本驱动的方法,用于识别使用类似政策框架的行为者群体。本文使用GPT-4识别108篇新闻文章和采访中的初始代码(“概念”)和相关引用。GPT-4产生的结果与研究人员准备的密码本进行了比较。GPT-4识别了研究人员发现的超过三分之二的概念,并且在筛选大量不相关的媒体项目方面非常准确。然而,GPT-4也提供了许多不相关的概念,需要研究人员审查和删除。讨论反映了在DNA和其他情况的码本制备中使用GPT-4的影响,包括需要人工参与和样本测试以了解其优势和局限性,这可能会限制效率的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science Computer Review
Social Science Computer Review 社会科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unique Scope Social Science Computer Review is an interdisciplinary journal covering social science instructional and research applications of computing, as well as societal impacts of informational technology. Topics included: artificial intelligence, business, computational social science theory, computer-assisted survey research, computer-based qualitative analysis, computer simulation, economic modeling, electronic modeling, electronic publishing, geographic information systems, instrumentation and research tools, public administration, social impacts of computing and telecommunications, software evaluation, world-wide web resources for social scientists. Interdisciplinary Nature Because the Uses and impacts of computing are interdisciplinary, so is Social Science Computer Review. The journal is of direct relevance to scholars and scientists in a wide variety of disciplines. In its pages you''ll find work in the following areas: sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, psychology, computer literacy, computer applications, and methodology.
期刊最新文献
The Black Box, Animated Idols, and Racialization How Much Data Should I Request? Balancing Richness and Compliance in Digital Trace Data Donations Evolution of Deep Learning Models for Misinformation Detection in Social Media Textual Data: Background, Architectures, Datasets, and Emerging LLM Applications Filtering out the Opposition: How Cross-Cutting Discussions Increase Unfriending Through Political Corrections and Insults in Spain and Germany Effects of Social Media Addiction on Critical Thinking: The Mediating Role of Executive Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1