Small Bite Fascial Closure Technique Associated With Reduction in Fascial Dehiscence

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.013
Jinman Cai MD , James G. Kwok BS , Catherine A. Buck MS , Andrew T. King BS , Mamata R. Tokala BS , Katie L. Bower MD , Joshua D. Stodghill DO , Bryan R. Collier DO , Jacob R. Gillen MD
{"title":"Small Bite Fascial Closure Technique Associated With Reduction in Fascial Dehiscence","authors":"Jinman Cai MD ,&nbsp;James G. Kwok BS ,&nbsp;Catherine A. Buck MS ,&nbsp;Andrew T. King BS ,&nbsp;Mamata R. Tokala BS ,&nbsp;Katie L. Bower MD ,&nbsp;Joshua D. Stodghill DO ,&nbsp;Bryan R. Collier DO ,&nbsp;Jacob R. Gillen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Abdominal fascial dehiscence (FD) is a postoperative complication with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of FD exceeded the national average at our institution. As small bite fascial closure technique has been shown to decrease dehiscence rate compared with traditional 10 mm bites in elective low-risk populations, we hypothesized that a 5 mm bite and 5 mm travel fascial closure technique would be associated with a lower FD rate in patients undergoing both elective and emergent laparotomy at our institution.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing an operation requiring a midline laparotomy were identified. Cohort periods were defined as preintervention (January 6, 2019, to May 31, 2021) and postintervention (April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023). Intervention consisted of simulation laboratory education and training for surgical residents and faculty regarding small bite fascial closure technique. Demographics and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was FD as identified by Patient Safety Indicator 14 or International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code and confirmed via chart review. Statistical comparisons were performed using either Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance or Fisher's exact test (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Regression analysis was performed to estimate the effects of various predictors on the log odds of the outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 1611 patients in the preintervention cohort and 906 patients in the postintervention cohort. Demographics and outcomes were similar between the two cohorts. The average body mass index was 29 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in both groups. The dehiscence rate significantly decreased from preintervention to postintervention based on the both International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (2.05% <em>versus</em> 0.88%, <em>P</em> = 0.029) and Patient Safety Indicator 14 definitions (0.99% <em>versus</em> 0.22%, <em>P</em> = 0.028).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated that the small bite and small travel fascial closure technique was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of FD in patients undergoing laparotomy at our institution in an overweight patient population. This technique offers a teachable and low-cost method to mitigate this complication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 153-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Abdominal fascial dehiscence (FD) is a postoperative complication with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of FD exceeded the national average at our institution. As small bite fascial closure technique has been shown to decrease dehiscence rate compared with traditional 10 mm bites in elective low-risk populations, we hypothesized that a 5 mm bite and 5 mm travel fascial closure technique would be associated with a lower FD rate in patients undergoing both elective and emergent laparotomy at our institution.

Methods

Patients undergoing an operation requiring a midline laparotomy were identified. Cohort periods were defined as preintervention (January 6, 2019, to May 31, 2021) and postintervention (April 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023). Intervention consisted of simulation laboratory education and training for surgical residents and faculty regarding small bite fascial closure technique. Demographics and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was FD as identified by Patient Safety Indicator 14 or International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code and confirmed via chart review. Statistical comparisons were performed using either Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance or Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Regression analysis was performed to estimate the effects of various predictors on the log odds of the outcome.

Results

There were 1611 patients in the preintervention cohort and 906 patients in the postintervention cohort. Demographics and outcomes were similar between the two cohorts. The average body mass index was 29 kg/m2 in both groups. The dehiscence rate significantly decreased from preintervention to postintervention based on the both International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (2.05% versus 0.88%, P = 0.029) and Patient Safety Indicator 14 definitions (0.99% versus 0.22%, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the small bite and small travel fascial closure technique was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of FD in patients undergoing laparotomy at our institution in an overweight patient population. This technique offers a teachable and low-cost method to mitigate this complication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小咬筋膜闭合技术与减少筋膜开裂相关
腹筋膜开裂(FD)是一种术后并发症,发病率和死亡率都很高。FD的发病率超过了全国平均水平。由于在选择性低风险人群中,与传统的10mm咬痕相比,小咬痕筋膜关闭技术已被证明可以降低开裂率,我们假设在我们机构接受选择性和紧急剖腹手术的患者中,5mm咬痕和5mm移动筋膜关闭技术将与较低的FD率相关。方法选取需要剖腹中线手术的患者。队列期定义为干预前(2019年1月6日至2021年5月31日)和干预后(2022年4月1日至2023年6月30日)。干预措施包括模拟实验室教育和对外科住院医师和教师进行小咬筋膜闭合技术的培训。比较人口统计学和结果。主要结局为FD,由患者安全指标14或国际疾病分类第十版代码确定,并通过图表审查确认。采用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析或Fisher精确检验(P <;0.05)。进行回归分析以估计各种预测因子对结果对数赔率的影响。结果干预前队列1611例,干预后队列906例。两个队列的人口统计数据和结果相似。两组平均体重指数均为29 kg/m2。根据国际疾病分类第十版(2.05%比0.88%,P = 0.029)和患者安全指标14定义(0.99%比0.22%,P = 0.028),干预前和干预后的裂开率均显著降低。结论:本研究表明,在我院超重患者人群中,小咬合和小行程筋膜闭合技术可显著降低剖腹手术患者的FD率。这种技术提供了一种可教且低成本的方法来减轻这种复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Pay to Play: A Cost Analysis of Open Access Publications for Matched Plastic Surgery Applicants. Dual Stress Postischemia Deprivation Depression via Metabolic Disturbance in Rodents. Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Classification Model for Injury Mechanism in Trauma. Partial Duodenal Obstructions: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Analysis of Clinical Factors. Supply and Demand: Pediatric Surgical Specialties Fellowship Match Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1