Seismic experimental research on damaged resilient reinforced concrete columns retrofitted by FRP sheets

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120119
Yunjian He , Gaochuang Cai , Cheng Xie , Prafulla Bahadur Malla , Yiyuan Li , Amir Si Larbi
{"title":"Seismic experimental research on damaged resilient reinforced concrete columns retrofitted by FRP sheets","authors":"Yunjian He ,&nbsp;Gaochuang Cai ,&nbsp;Cheng Xie ,&nbsp;Prafulla Bahadur Malla ,&nbsp;Yiyuan Li ,&nbsp;Amir Si Larbi","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The post-earthquake repairability was an attractive advantage of reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures with resilient RC (RRC) members. This paper investigates the seismic behavior of six RRC columns repaired with different fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) types, the number of FRP layers, and additional steel plates. The results indicate that all original RRC columns exhibited a drift-hardening behavior before the drift ratio reached 3.0 %, while the residual drift ratio was less than 0.5 %. FRP-repaired RRC columns can achieve even higher peak strength than the original columns and effectively control their residual deformation. The increase in the number of carbon FRP (CFRP) layers leads to a decrease in residual displacement, while the type of FRP has no significant effect. Compared with the Aramid FRP-repaired column, the CFRP-repaired column showed higher initial stiffness and lower stiffness degradation rate. The FRP-steel plate repaired columns showed the highest initial stiffness and energy dissipation capacity. A simplified model containing two yield points was proposed to evaluate the residual displacement of the repaired RRC column referring to the FEMA’s recommendation which was based on the displacement at steel bar yield. In addition, a bilinear skeleton model curve based on a simplified hysteresis loop rule was proposed to predict the hysteresis behavior of the repaired RRC columns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The post-earthquake repairability was an attractive advantage of reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures with resilient RC (RRC) members. This paper investigates the seismic behavior of six RRC columns repaired with different fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) types, the number of FRP layers, and additional steel plates. The results indicate that all original RRC columns exhibited a drift-hardening behavior before the drift ratio reached 3.0 %, while the residual drift ratio was less than 0.5 %. FRP-repaired RRC columns can achieve even higher peak strength than the original columns and effectively control their residual deformation. The increase in the number of carbon FRP (CFRP) layers leads to a decrease in residual displacement, while the type of FRP has no significant effect. Compared with the Aramid FRP-repaired column, the CFRP-repaired column showed higher initial stiffness and lower stiffness degradation rate. The FRP-steel plate repaired columns showed the highest initial stiffness and energy dissipation capacity. A simplified model containing two yield points was proposed to evaluate the residual displacement of the repaired RRC column referring to the FEMA’s recommendation which was based on the displacement at steel bar yield. In addition, a bilinear skeleton model curve based on a simplified hysteresis loop rule was proposed to predict the hysteresis behavior of the repaired RRC columns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FRP布加固损伤弹性钢筋混凝土柱的抗震试验研究
具有弹性构件的钢筋混凝土框架结构具有地震后可修复性。本文研究了6根钢筋混凝土柱用不同的纤维增强聚合物(FRP)类型、FRP层数和附加钢板进行修复的抗震性能。结果表明:原始RRC柱在漂移比达到3.0 %前均表现出漂移硬化行为,残余漂移比小于0.5 %;frp修复后的RRC柱峰值强度高于原柱,并能有效控制残余变形。碳纤维复合材料(CFRP)层数的增加导致残余位移的减少,而FRP的类型没有显著的影响。与芳纶纤维修复柱相比,cfrp修复柱具有更高的初始刚度和更低的刚度退化率。frp -钢板修复柱具有最高的初始刚度和耗能能力。参考美国联邦应急管理局(FEMA)推荐的基于钢筋屈服时位移的钢筋混凝土修复柱剩余位移评估模型,提出了包含两个屈服点的简化模型。此外,提出了一种基于简化迟滞回线规则的双线性骨架模型曲线来预测修复后的钢筋混凝土柱的迟滞行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Seismic performance of a novel prefabricated RC column-H steel beam joint: Testing, modelling and design Crack propagation in honeycomb structures under thermal shock using Lord-Shulman theory Fatigue bond behavior between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars A theoretical model for circular concrete filled steel tubes under compression considering the effect of stress path Spaceborne-InSAR monitoring framework for large-span spatial structures based on temperature-based structural identification theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1