A data-driven approach for predicting peak floor response based on visually observed rocking behaviors of freestanding NSCs

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120006
Yongqing Jiang , Jianze Wang , Weiwei Chen , Kaoshan Dai
{"title":"A data-driven approach for predicting peak floor response based on visually observed rocking behaviors of freestanding NSCs","authors":"Yongqing Jiang ,&nbsp;Jianze Wang ,&nbsp;Weiwei Chen ,&nbsp;Kaoshan Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate prediction of structural responses under earthquakes is crucial for seismic performance evaluation. Traditional methods of obtaining structural response mainly rely on costly structural health monitoring (SHM) systems while paying little attention to the damage state of unanchored non-structural components (NSCs). The surveillance system is commonly equipped in commercial and public buildings, which could be used to capture the response motions and damage states of NSCs during earthquakes. To this end, this study aims to develop a method for inferring peak floor acceleration (PFA) based on the observed seismic response of NSCs. Three computer vision tasks for collecting responses of NSCs with different data ambiguity are considered. For a purpose of the method implementation, three prototype structures with different heights are used in this study. Freestanding NSCs with different geometric properties are considered to be placed in the structures. Under a synthesis of ground motions, the datasets for floor acceleration responses of the structures and dynamic responses of freestanding NSCs are obtained via numerical simulations. This study finds out that regression models for predicting PFA values are untrustworthy due to the weak correlation between PFAs and response quantities of NSCs. Instead of predicting exact PFA values, the potential PFA ranges are considered to be predicted and a list of PFA ranges is determined based on rocking fragility models of freestanding NSCs. Machine learning techniques are employed to build the surrogate models and the results demonstrate the accuracy and interpretability of the PFA range prediction with the <span><math><mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>F</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></mrow><mo>‐</mo><mi>s</mi><mi>c</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> ranging from 84 % to 94 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 120006"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625003979","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate prediction of structural responses under earthquakes is crucial for seismic performance evaluation. Traditional methods of obtaining structural response mainly rely on costly structural health monitoring (SHM) systems while paying little attention to the damage state of unanchored non-structural components (NSCs). The surveillance system is commonly equipped in commercial and public buildings, which could be used to capture the response motions and damage states of NSCs during earthquakes. To this end, this study aims to develop a method for inferring peak floor acceleration (PFA) based on the observed seismic response of NSCs. Three computer vision tasks for collecting responses of NSCs with different data ambiguity are considered. For a purpose of the method implementation, three prototype structures with different heights are used in this study. Freestanding NSCs with different geometric properties are considered to be placed in the structures. Under a synthesis of ground motions, the datasets for floor acceleration responses of the structures and dynamic responses of freestanding NSCs are obtained via numerical simulations. This study finds out that regression models for predicting PFA values are untrustworthy due to the weak correlation between PFAs and response quantities of NSCs. Instead of predicting exact PFA values, the potential PFA ranges are considered to be predicted and a list of PFA ranges is determined based on rocking fragility models of freestanding NSCs. Machine learning techniques are employed to build the surrogate models and the results demonstrate the accuracy and interpretability of the PFA range prediction with the F1score ranging from 84 % to 94 %.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准确预测地震下的结构响应对于抗震性能评估至关重要。获取结构响应的传统方法主要依赖于成本高昂的结构健康监测(SHM)系统,而对非锚固非结构部件(NSCs)的破坏状态关注甚少。监控系统通常配备在商业和公共建筑中,可用于捕捉地震时非结构部件的响应运动和损坏状态。为此,本研究旨在开发一种根据观测到的非结构部件地震响应推断地板峰值加速度(PFA)的方法。本研究考虑了三种计算机视觉任务,以收集具有不同数据模糊性的非结构体响应。为了实现该方法,本研究使用了三个不同高度的原型结构。考虑将具有不同几何特性的独立式 NSC 放置在这些结构中。在地面运动的综合作用下,通过数值模拟获得了结构的地板加速度响应数据集和独立式无损检测中心的动态响应数据集。本研究发现,由于 PFA 与非机动构件响应量之间的相关性较弱,预测 PFA 值的回归模型不可信。因此,我们不再预测精确的 PFA 值,而是考虑预测潜在的 PFA 范围,并根据独立 NSC 的摇动脆性模型确定了 PFA 范围列表。采用机器学习技术建立代用模型,结果表明 PFA 范围预测的准确性和可解释性很高,F1 分数从 84 % 到 94 % 不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
A data-driven approach for predicting peak floor response based on visually observed rocking behaviors of freestanding NSCs Vibration source characteristics and vibration reduction mechanism of the novel rubber pad floating slab track in metro turnout areas Crack width simulation with discrete reinforcement and 3D nonlinear finite element models Seismic experimental research on damaged resilient reinforced concrete columns retrofitted by FRP sheets Machine learning-based and interpretable models for predicting the resistance and probability of progressive collapse of steel frame-composite floor structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1