Stomach content analysis: Comparison amongst different sources of sampling in the study of the diet of sea lions in Argentina

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109246
Ana Harrington , Gustavo A. Daneri , Esperanza A. Varela , Adriana Farias , Mariana Descalzo , Alejandra V. Volpedo
{"title":"Stomach content analysis: Comparison amongst different sources of sampling in the study of the diet of sea lions in Argentina","authors":"Ana Harrington ,&nbsp;Gustavo A. Daneri ,&nbsp;Esperanza A. Varela ,&nbsp;Adriana Farias ,&nbsp;Mariana Descalzo ,&nbsp;Alejandra V. Volpedo","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The South American sea lion, <em>Otaria flavescens,</em> has proven to be an excellent biological sampler of the marine biodiversity since it is possible, through the examination of its diet, to determinate the distribution and abundance of marine resources in the northern Patagonian ecosystem. There are different methods to analyze the diet of pinnipeds, such as the use of scats, stomach contents, fatty acids and stable isotopes. The aim of the present study was to compare the type of information obtained from stomach contents analysis according to different sources of sampling (1- stomach contents from animals found dead on the coast, 2- natural regurgitations and 3- stomach lavage of previously anesthetized individuals). Between 2005 and 2022 a total of 48 stomach contents of <em>O. flavescens</em> were obtained at the sea lions rookeries of Punta Bermeja (41°09′S, 63°05′ W), Promontorio Belén (41° 09′S; 63° 48′W) and Caleta de los Loros (41°02′ S 64°10′ W) (San Matías gulf, Argentina). These three sources of sampling provided different dietary information. Stomach contents from dead animals presented more diverse prey than those coming from the two other sources. Overall, the fish species <em>Raneya brasiliensis</em> was the main prey item found, followed by cephalopods and crustaceans, coinciding with previous dietary reports based on scat analysis. The results obtained suggest that scat analysis is still the most appropriate method for monitoring the diet of sea lions on a temporal and spatial basis, being stomach content analysis a good complementary source of information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 109246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771425001246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South American sea lion, Otaria flavescens, has proven to be an excellent biological sampler of the marine biodiversity since it is possible, through the examination of its diet, to determinate the distribution and abundance of marine resources in the northern Patagonian ecosystem. There are different methods to analyze the diet of pinnipeds, such as the use of scats, stomach contents, fatty acids and stable isotopes. The aim of the present study was to compare the type of information obtained from stomach contents analysis according to different sources of sampling (1- stomach contents from animals found dead on the coast, 2- natural regurgitations and 3- stomach lavage of previously anesthetized individuals). Between 2005 and 2022 a total of 48 stomach contents of O. flavescens were obtained at the sea lions rookeries of Punta Bermeja (41°09′S, 63°05′ W), Promontorio Belén (41° 09′S; 63° 48′W) and Caleta de los Loros (41°02′ S 64°10′ W) (San Matías gulf, Argentina). These three sources of sampling provided different dietary information. Stomach contents from dead animals presented more diverse prey than those coming from the two other sources. Overall, the fish species Raneya brasiliensis was the main prey item found, followed by cephalopods and crustaceans, coinciding with previous dietary reports based on scat analysis. The results obtained suggest that scat analysis is still the most appropriate method for monitoring the diet of sea lions on a temporal and spatial basis, being stomach content analysis a good complementary source of information.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
期刊最新文献
Stomach content analysis: Comparison amongst different sources of sampling in the study of the diet of sea lions in Argentina Editorial Board Impact of duck predation on the population of Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in tidal flat Contribution of different bacterial groups in the carbon flow through the microbial food web Impact of storm surge and power peaking on tidal-fluvial processes in microtidal Neretva River estuary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1