Predictors of successful Picture Exchange Communication System training in children with communication impairments: insights from a real-world intervention in a resource-limited setting.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003282
Prakasit Wannapaschaiyong, Thitaporn Vivattanasinchai, Awassada Wongkwanmuang
{"title":"Predictors of successful Picture Exchange Communication System training in children with communication impairments: insights from a real-world intervention in a resource-limited setting.","authors":"Prakasit Wannapaschaiyong, Thitaporn Vivattanasinchai, Awassada Wongkwanmuang","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with communication impairments-such as autism spectrum disorder or global developmental delay-face significant challenges affecting their emotional and behavioural development. The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) is an augmentative communication tool designed to enhance their skills. However, its effectiveness can vary in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to identify predictors of successful PECS training among children with communication impairments in such environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analysed records of 61 children with communication impairments who underwent PECS training at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, from 2020 to 2023. Success was defined as achieving PECS phase 3 proficiency and a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score of 1-3 after 1 year. Logistic regression identified predictors of successful outcomes based on demographic, clinical, family and training-related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1 year, 46% (28 out of 61) of the children achieved successful PECS outcomes. Significant predictors of success were lower severity of communication impairment (Clinical Global Impression-Severity ≤4; adjusted OR= 15.24, p = 0.002), higher frequency of PECS sessions (>6 times per year; OR = 9.11, p = 0.010), higher family income (≥20,000 baht per month; OR = 9.83, p = 0.024) and frequent home practice (≥3 times per week; OR = 7.02, p = 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In resource-limited settings, factors such as severity of impairment, intensity of intervention, socioeconomic status and caregiver involvement significantly influence the success of PECS training. Tailored interventions and strategic resource allocation are crucial to optimise communication outcomes for these children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with communication impairments-such as autism spectrum disorder or global developmental delay-face significant challenges affecting their emotional and behavioural development. The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) is an augmentative communication tool designed to enhance their skills. However, its effectiveness can vary in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to identify predictors of successful PECS training among children with communication impairments in such environments.

Methods: This retrospective study analysed records of 61 children with communication impairments who underwent PECS training at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, from 2020 to 2023. Success was defined as achieving PECS phase 3 proficiency and a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score of 1-3 after 1 year. Logistic regression identified predictors of successful outcomes based on demographic, clinical, family and training-related factors.

Results: After 1 year, 46% (28 out of 61) of the children achieved successful PECS outcomes. Significant predictors of success were lower severity of communication impairment (Clinical Global Impression-Severity ≤4; adjusted OR= 15.24, p = 0.002), higher frequency of PECS sessions (>6 times per year; OR = 9.11, p = 0.010), higher family income (≥20,000 baht per month; OR = 9.83, p = 0.024) and frequent home practice (≥3 times per week; OR = 7.02, p = 0.066).

Conclusions: In resource-limited settings, factors such as severity of impairment, intensity of intervention, socioeconomic status and caregiver involvement significantly influence the success of PECS training. Tailored interventions and strategic resource allocation are crucial to optimise communication outcomes for these children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Dexmedetomidine in neonates: utilisation trends and safety profile over time in a neonatal intensive care unit. Exploring the current usage of and attitudes towards transanastomotic tube (TAT) feeding in infants born with duodenal atresia: a survey of practice in the UK. The impact of climate change on child nutrition in Indonesia: a conceptual framework and scoping review of the available evidence. Feasibility and acceptability of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) in universal health visiting practice in England: a mixed-methods study using Normalisation Process Theory. Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1