Understanding your Biases in Collecting Organismal VOCs.

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Journal of Chemical Ecology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s10886-025-01592-4
Lucas Seybert, Christophe Duplais
{"title":"Understanding your Biases in Collecting Organismal VOCs.","authors":"Lucas Seybert, Christophe Duplais","doi":"10.1007/s10886-025-01592-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play a fundamental role in organismal interactions, facilitating intra- and interspecific communications. Accurate collection and analysis of VOCs are essential for understanding these interactions, but the choice of collection methods and adsorbent materials can introduce biases. This study investigates the variability and recovery yield in VOC collection using various adsorbents and thin-film solid-phase microextraction (TF-SPME). We compared the performance of nine adsorbents and TF-SPME in capturing a standard VOC mixture and VOCs from rosemary plants. Results show significant differences in efficiency among adsorbents, with Porapak<sup>®</sup> P generally providing the best recovery for most compounds. TF-SPME exhibited higher sensitivity and detected a broader range of volatiles compared to adsorbents, though qualitative profiles varied. Our findings underscore the importance of empirical testing in adsorbent selection and highlight the inherent biases in VOC collection methods. These insights aim to guide and empower researchers in making informed decisions regarding experimental design and data interpretation to achieve more accurate and reliable VOC results in chemical ecology studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Ecology","volume":"51 2","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-025-01592-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play a fundamental role in organismal interactions, facilitating intra- and interspecific communications. Accurate collection and analysis of VOCs are essential for understanding these interactions, but the choice of collection methods and adsorbent materials can introduce biases. This study investigates the variability and recovery yield in VOC collection using various adsorbents and thin-film solid-phase microextraction (TF-SPME). We compared the performance of nine adsorbents and TF-SPME in capturing a standard VOC mixture and VOCs from rosemary plants. Results show significant differences in efficiency among adsorbents, with Porapak® P generally providing the best recovery for most compounds. TF-SPME exhibited higher sensitivity and detected a broader range of volatiles compared to adsorbents, though qualitative profiles varied. Our findings underscore the importance of empirical testing in adsorbent selection and highlight the inherent biases in VOC collection methods. These insights aim to guide and empower researchers in making informed decisions regarding experimental design and data interpretation to achieve more accurate and reliable VOC results in chemical ecology studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解你收集有机挥发性有机化合物的偏见。
挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)在生物相互作用中起着重要作用,促进了种内和种间的交流。准确收集和分析挥发性有机化合物对于理解这些相互作用至关重要,但收集方法和吸附材料的选择可能会引入偏差。本研究考察了不同吸附剂和薄膜固相微萃取(TF-SPME)对VOC收集的变异性和回收率。我们比较了九种吸附剂和TF-SPME在捕获标准VOC混合物和迷迭香植物中VOC的性能。结果表明,不同吸附剂的回收率存在显著差异,其中Porapak®P对大多数化合物的回收率最高。与吸附剂相比,TF-SPME表现出更高的灵敏度,检测到的挥发物范围更广,尽管定性剖面有所不同。我们的研究结果强调了吸附剂选择经验测试的重要性,并强调了VOC收集方法的固有偏见。这些见解旨在指导和授权研究人员在实验设计和数据解释方面做出明智的决定,从而在化学生态学研究中获得更准确和可靠的VOC结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Ecology
Journal of Chemical Ecology 环境科学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Chemical Ecology is devoted to promoting an ecological understanding of the origin, function, and significance of natural chemicals that mediate interactions within and between organisms. Such relationships, often adaptively important, comprise the oldest of communication systems in terrestrial and aquatic environments. With recent advances in methodology for elucidating structures of the chemical compounds involved, a strong interdisciplinary association has developed between chemists and biologists which should accelerate understanding of these interactions in nature. Scientific contributions, including review articles, are welcome from either members or nonmembers of the International Society of Chemical Ecology. Manuscripts must be in English and may include original research in biological and/or chemical aspects of chemical ecology. They may include substantive observations of interactions in nature, the elucidation of the chemical compounds involved, the mechanisms of their production and reception, and the translation of such basic information into survey and control protocols. Sufficient biological and chemical detail should be given to substantiate conclusions and to permit results to be evaluated and reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Feral Cat Responses to Silver Vine: Implications for Feral Cat Management. Chemotaxonomy and Ecological Role of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids: A Comprehensive Review of the Case Study of Africa. Metabolic and Biochemical Responses of Heirloom and Hybrid Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Under Flooding, Specialist, and Generalist Insect Herbivory, and their Stress Combination. Harnessing Allelopathic Autotoxicity for Invasive Plant Management: Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Directions. Maternal Pheromone Emission During Biparental Care: Evidence for Consistent Individual Differences and Links to Terminal Investment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1