Sean W.W. Noona MD , Steven D. Young MD , Andrew M. Young MD , Raymond J. Strobel MD, MS , Matthew P. Weber MD , Ebun Ajadi MD , Mohammed Quader MD , Mark Joseph MD , Leora T. Yarboro MD , Kenan Yount MD , Nicholas R. Teman MD , Jared P. Beller MD
{"title":"Predictors of Radial Artery Use in Coronary Bypass Grafting: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study","authors":"Sean W.W. Noona MD , Steven D. Young MD , Andrew M. Young MD , Raymond J. Strobel MD, MS , Matthew P. Weber MD , Ebun Ajadi MD , Mohammed Quader MD , Mark Joseph MD , Leora T. Yarboro MD , Kenan Yount MD , Nicholas R. Teman MD , Jared P. Beller MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To explore trends and analyze clinical and angiographic predictors of radial utilization in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 17,352 patients undergoing isolated CABG (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database linked with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of radial artery (RA) use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Radial artery grafts (RAGs) were used in 1745 patients (10.0%). Utilization increased from 3.34% (2017) to 14.24% (2022) (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Patients receiving RAGs were younger (60 [53-67] <em>versus</em> 67 [60-73] y, <em>P</em> < 0.001), had lower predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (6% <em>versus</em> 9%, <em>P</em> < 0.001), and lower incidence of heart failure (25% <em>versus</em> 32%, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Predictors of RA use included higher preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [1.10-1.27], <em>P</em> < 0.001), male sex (OR 1.72 [1.44-2.05], <em>P</em> < 0.001), and increasing surgery year (OR 1.38 [1.33-1.44], <em>P</em> < 0.001). Conversely, severe chronic kidney disease (OR 0.30 [0.18-0.49], <em>P</em> < 0.001), older age (OR 0.56 [0.52-0.60], <em>P</em> < 0.001), and higher predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (OR 0.79 [0.71-0.89], <em>P</em> < 0.001) decreased likelihood of receiving a RAG. Critical lesion stenosis (≥90%) did not predict RA use (OR 1.06 [0.78-1.44], <em>P</em> = 0.70).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RA use in CABG remains limited, predominantly in younger, healthier patients. These findings suggest surgeons likely consider clinical and potential long-term benefits in choosing radial grafting. Understanding relative predictors of radial grafting could enhance CABG outcomes across patient demographics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002248042500085X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
To explore trends and analyze clinical and angiographic predictors of radial utilization in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods
We analyzed data from 17,352 patients undergoing isolated CABG (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database linked with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of radial artery (RA) use.
Results
Radial artery grafts (RAGs) were used in 1745 patients (10.0%). Utilization increased from 3.34% (2017) to 14.24% (2022) (P < 0.001). Patients receiving RAGs were younger (60 [53-67] versus 67 [60-73] y, P < 0.001), had lower predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (6% versus 9%, P < 0.001), and lower incidence of heart failure (25% versus 32%, P < 0.001). Predictors of RA use included higher preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [1.10-1.27], P < 0.001), male sex (OR 1.72 [1.44-2.05], P < 0.001), and increasing surgery year (OR 1.38 [1.33-1.44], P < 0.001). Conversely, severe chronic kidney disease (OR 0.30 [0.18-0.49], P < 0.001), older age (OR 0.56 [0.52-0.60], P < 0.001), and higher predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (OR 0.79 [0.71-0.89], P < 0.001) decreased likelihood of receiving a RAG. Critical lesion stenosis (≥90%) did not predict RA use (OR 1.06 [0.78-1.44], P = 0.70).
Conclusions
RA use in CABG remains limited, predominantly in younger, healthier patients. These findings suggest surgeons likely consider clinical and potential long-term benefits in choosing radial grafting. Understanding relative predictors of radial grafting could enhance CABG outcomes across patient demographics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.