Sean W.W. Noona MD , Steven D. Young MD , Andrew M. Young MD , Raymond J. Strobel MD, MS , Matthew P. Weber MD , Ebun Ajadi MD , Mohammed Quader MD , Mark Joseph MD , Leora T. Yarboro MD , Kenan Yount MD , Nicholas R. Teman MD , Jared P. Beller MD
{"title":"Predictors of Radial Artery Use in Coronary Bypass Grafting: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study","authors":"Sean W.W. Noona MD , Steven D. Young MD , Andrew M. Young MD , Raymond J. Strobel MD, MS , Matthew P. Weber MD , Ebun Ajadi MD , Mohammed Quader MD , Mark Joseph MD , Leora T. Yarboro MD , Kenan Yount MD , Nicholas R. Teman MD , Jared P. Beller MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To explore trends and analyze clinical and angiographic predictors of radial utilization in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 17,352 patients undergoing isolated CABG (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database linked with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of radial artery (RA) use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Radial artery grafts (RAGs) were used in 1745 patients (10.0%). Utilization increased from 3.34% (2017) to 14.24% (2022) (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Patients receiving RAGs were younger (60 [53-67] <em>versus</em> 67 [60-73] y, <em>P</em> < 0.001), had lower predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (6% <em>versus</em> 9%, <em>P</em> < 0.001), and lower incidence of heart failure (25% <em>versus</em> 32%, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Predictors of RA use included higher preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [1.10-1.27], <em>P</em> < 0.001), male sex (OR 1.72 [1.44-2.05], <em>P</em> < 0.001), and increasing surgery year (OR 1.38 [1.33-1.44], <em>P</em> < 0.001). Conversely, severe chronic kidney disease (OR 0.30 [0.18-0.49], <em>P</em> < 0.001), older age (OR 0.56 [0.52-0.60], <em>P</em> < 0.001), and higher predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (OR 0.79 [0.71-0.89], <em>P</em> < 0.001) decreased likelihood of receiving a RAG. Critical lesion stenosis (≥90%) did not predict RA use (OR 1.06 [0.78-1.44], <em>P</em> = 0.70).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RA use in CABG remains limited, predominantly in younger, healthier patients. These findings suggest surgeons likely consider clinical and potential long-term benefits in choosing radial grafting. Understanding relative predictors of radial grafting could enhance CABG outcomes across patient demographics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002248042500085X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
To explore trends and analyze clinical and angiographic predictors of radial utilization in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods
We analyzed data from 17,352 patients undergoing isolated CABG (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022) in a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database linked with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of radial artery (RA) use.
Results
Radial artery grafts (RAGs) were used in 1745 patients (10.0%). Utilization increased from 3.34% (2017) to 14.24% (2022) (P < 0.001). Patients receiving RAGs were younger (60 [53-67] versus 67 [60-73] y, P < 0.001), had lower predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (6% versus 9%, P < 0.001), and lower incidence of heart failure (25% versus 32%, P < 0.001). Predictors of RA use included higher preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [1.10-1.27], P < 0.001), male sex (OR 1.72 [1.44-2.05], P < 0.001), and increasing surgery year (OR 1.38 [1.33-1.44], P < 0.001). Conversely, severe chronic kidney disease (OR 0.30 [0.18-0.49], P < 0.001), older age (OR 0.56 [0.52-0.60], P < 0.001), and higher predicted risk of morbidity or mortality (OR 0.79 [0.71-0.89], P < 0.001) decreased likelihood of receiving a RAG. Critical lesion stenosis (≥90%) did not predict RA use (OR 1.06 [0.78-1.44], P = 0.70).
Conclusions
RA use in CABG remains limited, predominantly in younger, healthier patients. These findings suggest surgeons likely consider clinical and potential long-term benefits in choosing radial grafting. Understanding relative predictors of radial grafting could enhance CABG outcomes across patient demographics.
目的探讨孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者桡动脉利用率的变化趋势,并分析其临床和血管造影预测因素。方法:我们分析了地区胸外科学会成人心脏外科数据库中与国家心血管数据注册中心(CathPCI)注册中心相连的17,352例接受孤立性CABG的患者(2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日)的数据。多变量logistic回归评估桡动脉(RA)使用的预测因素。结果桡动脉移植1745例(10.0%)。利用率从3.34%(2017年)增加到14.24%(2022年)(P <;0.001)。接受rag治疗的患者更年轻(60 [53-67]vs . 67 [60-73]), P <;0.001),发病率或死亡率的预测风险较低(6%对9%,P <;0.001),心衰发生率较低(25%对32%,P <;0.001)。RA使用的预测因素包括术前射血分数较高(比值比[OR] 1.18 [1.10-1.27], P <;0.001),男性(OR 1.72 [1.44-2.05], P <;0.001),增加手术年限(OR 1.38 [1.33-1.44], P <;0.001)。相反,重度慢性肾病(OR 0.30 [0.18-0.49], P <;0.001),年龄较大(OR 0.56 [0.52-0.60], P <;0.001),并且更高的预测发病率或死亡率风险(or 0.79 [0.71-0.89], P <;0.001)接受RAG的可能性降低。严重病变狭窄(≥90%)不能预测RA的使用(OR 1.06 [0.78-1.44], P = 0.70)。结论:ra在冠脉搭桥中的应用仍然有限,主要是在年轻、健康的患者中。这些发现表明外科医生在选择桡骨移植时可能会考虑临床和潜在的长期利益。了解桡骨移植术的相关预测因素可以提高患者冠状动脉搭桥的预后。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.