Freya Mills, John Drury, Charlotte E Hall, Dale Weston, Charles Symons, Richard Amlôt, Holly Carter
{"title":"A mixed studies systematic review on the health and wellbeing effects, and underlying mechanisms, of online support groups for chronic conditions.","authors":"Freya Mills, John Drury, Charlotte E Hall, Dale Weston, Charles Symons, Richard Amlôt, Holly Carter","doi":"10.1038/s44271-025-00217-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pre-registered systematic review aimed to examine whether online support groups affect the health and wellbeing of individuals with a chronic condition, and what mechanisms may influence such effects. In September 2024, literature searches were conducted across electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Google Scholar), pre-publication websites (MedRxiv and PsyArXiv) and grey literature websites. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included if they explored the impact of online support groups on the health and wellbeing outcomes of individuals with a chronic condition. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. In total 100 papers met the inclusion criteria with their findings presented in a thematic synthesis. Health and wellbeing outcomes were categorised as: physical health, mental health, quality of life, social wellbeing, behaviour and decision-making, and adjustment. Mechanisms reported in these studies related to exchanging support, sharing experiences, content expression, and social comparison. User and group characteristics were also explored. The included studies suggest that online support groups can have a positive impact on social wellbeing, behaviour, and adjustment, with inconclusive findings for physical health and quality of life. However, there is also the possibility of a negative effect on anxiety and distress, particularly when exposed to other group members' difficult experiences. Research comparing different online group features, such as platforms, size, and duration is needed. In particular, future research should be experimental to overcome the limitations of some of the cross-sectional designs of the included studies. The review was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research in Emergency Preparedness and Response. Pre-registration ID: CRD42023399258.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00217-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This pre-registered systematic review aimed to examine whether online support groups affect the health and wellbeing of individuals with a chronic condition, and what mechanisms may influence such effects. In September 2024, literature searches were conducted across electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Google Scholar), pre-publication websites (MedRxiv and PsyArXiv) and grey literature websites. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included if they explored the impact of online support groups on the health and wellbeing outcomes of individuals with a chronic condition. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. In total 100 papers met the inclusion criteria with their findings presented in a thematic synthesis. Health and wellbeing outcomes were categorised as: physical health, mental health, quality of life, social wellbeing, behaviour and decision-making, and adjustment. Mechanisms reported in these studies related to exchanging support, sharing experiences, content expression, and social comparison. User and group characteristics were also explored. The included studies suggest that online support groups can have a positive impact on social wellbeing, behaviour, and adjustment, with inconclusive findings for physical health and quality of life. However, there is also the possibility of a negative effect on anxiety and distress, particularly when exposed to other group members' difficult experiences. Research comparing different online group features, such as platforms, size, and duration is needed. In particular, future research should be experimental to overcome the limitations of some of the cross-sectional designs of the included studies. The review was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research in Emergency Preparedness and Response. Pre-registration ID: CRD42023399258.
这项预先注册的系统评价旨在检查在线支持团体是否会影响慢性疾病患者的健康和福祉,以及影响这种影响的机制。在2024年9月,通过电子数据库(Medline、Embase、PsycInfo、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar)、出版前网站(MedRxiv和PsyArXiv)和灰色文献网站进行文献检索。定性和定量研究包括了在线支持团体对慢性疾病患者健康和福祉结果的影响。采用混合方法评价工具评价纳入研究的质量。总共有100篇论文符合纳入标准,其研究结果在专题综合中提出。健康和福祉结果分为:身体健康、心理健康、生活质量、社会福祉、行为和决策以及调整。这些研究报告的机制涉及交换支持、分享经验、内容表达和社会比较。用户和群体特征也进行了探讨。纳入的研究表明,在线支持团体可以对社会福祉、行为和适应产生积极影响,但对身体健康和生活质量的影响尚无定论。然而,也有可能对焦虑和痛苦产生负面影响,特别是当接触到其他小组成员的困难经历时。需要研究比较不同的在线群体特征,如平台、规模和持续时间。特别是,未来的研究应该是实验性的,以克服一些纳入研究的横截面设计的局限性。这项审查是由国家卫生和保健研究所资助的,卫生保护研究在应急准备和反应方面。预注册ID: CRD42023399258。