Social tolerance plays a key role in shared leadership

IF 2.1 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Animal Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123126
Yumeng Zhao , Yu Yan , Kexin Zhou , Changjian Fu , Xueting Yan , Xiaopeng Yu , Qin Zhu , Zhongqiu Li
{"title":"Social tolerance plays a key role in shared leadership","authors":"Yumeng Zhao ,&nbsp;Yu Yan ,&nbsp;Kexin Zhou ,&nbsp;Changjian Fu ,&nbsp;Xueting Yan ,&nbsp;Xiaopeng Yu ,&nbsp;Qin Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhongqiu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared leadership in consensus decision making has been observed in the collective movements of various mammalian species. While multiple social interactions influence this decision-making pattern, the link between social tolerance and the characteristics of collective movement remains underexplored. In this study, we propose a new ‘social tolerance’ hypothesis, suggesting that ‘social tolerance covaries with the level of shared leadership in collective movement’. We filmed 50 groups of Père David's deer, <em>Elaphurus davidianus</em>, by drone and collected collective movement characteristics and social tolerance characteristics on group and individual levels. Our findings revealed that (1) at the group level, tolerant groups showed higher levels of shared leadership, characterized by a higher proportion of leaders. Groups with higher proportions of females distributed leadership more evenly among their members. (2) At the individual level, females who formed more proximity interactions and males with higher dominance displayed higher leadership scores. Low-ranking females adopted an accelerated pace in recruiting followers, whereas none of the social tolerance characteristics in males correlated with followers' joining latency. In addition, females demonstrated a more equal distribution of shared leadership than males. These results may be due to differences in reproductive strategies between males and females. Although our work provides limited evidence for the ‘social tolerance’ hypothesis, we aimed to provide a deeper insight into the mechanisms by which social tolerance influences collective movements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 123126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347225000533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared leadership in consensus decision making has been observed in the collective movements of various mammalian species. While multiple social interactions influence this decision-making pattern, the link between social tolerance and the characteristics of collective movement remains underexplored. In this study, we propose a new ‘social tolerance’ hypothesis, suggesting that ‘social tolerance covaries with the level of shared leadership in collective movement’. We filmed 50 groups of Père David's deer, Elaphurus davidianus, by drone and collected collective movement characteristics and social tolerance characteristics on group and individual levels. Our findings revealed that (1) at the group level, tolerant groups showed higher levels of shared leadership, characterized by a higher proportion of leaders. Groups with higher proportions of females distributed leadership more evenly among their members. (2) At the individual level, females who formed more proximity interactions and males with higher dominance displayed higher leadership scores. Low-ranking females adopted an accelerated pace in recruiting followers, whereas none of the social tolerance characteristics in males correlated with followers' joining latency. In addition, females demonstrated a more equal distribution of shared leadership than males. These results may be due to differences in reproductive strategies between males and females. Although our work provides limited evidence for the ‘social tolerance’ hypothesis, we aimed to provide a deeper insight into the mechanisms by which social tolerance influences collective movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会宽容在共同领导中起着关键作用
在各种哺乳动物物种的集体运动中,已经观察到共识决策中的共同领导。虽然多种社会互动影响着这种决策模式,但社会容忍与集体运动特征之间的联系仍未得到充分探讨。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个新的“社会宽容”假设,认为“社会宽容与集体运动中的共同领导水平共变”。我们用无人机拍摄了50组麋鹿,Elaphurus davidianus,收集了群体和个体层面的集体运动特征和社会容忍特征。研究发现:(1)在群体层面上,宽容的群体表现出更高的共享领导水平,领导者比例更高。女性比例较高的团队在成员中分配领导权的比例更平均。(2)在个体层面上,亲近互动多的女性和优势度高的男性表现出更高的领导得分。低阶女性招募追随者的速度更快,而男性的社会宽容特征与追随者的加入潜伏期无关。此外,女性比男性表现出更平等的共同领导分配。这些结果可能是由于雄性和雌性在繁殖策略上的差异。虽然我们的研究为“社会宽容”假说提供了有限的证据,但我们的目标是对社会宽容影响集体运动的机制提供更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
期刊最新文献
Creatures of habit: similar but more repeatable behaviours in insular compared with mainland lizards Dogs’ behaviour is more similar to that of children than to that of cats in a prosocial problem situation Sperm storage ability is associated with oviposition but not mating behaviour differences in macrobiotid tardigrades Male great bowerbirds upregulate multiple sexual signals following bower wall removal Signal compression associated with Menzerath’s law affects the reproductive success of male frogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1