Analysis of seat belt buckle release forces in post-rollover scenarios: Implications for passenger safety

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104505
Shivaprasad Nageswaran , Yousif Abulhassan , Jerry Davis , Richard Sesek , Mark Schall , Sean Gallagher
{"title":"Analysis of seat belt buckle release forces in post-rollover scenarios: Implications for passenger safety","authors":"Shivaprasad Nageswaran ,&nbsp;Yousif Abulhassan ,&nbsp;Jerry Davis ,&nbsp;Richard Sesek ,&nbsp;Mark Schall ,&nbsp;Sean Gallagher","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seat belts have been in use for nearly 140 years and have a proven track record to be the single most effective tool in reducing fatal and nonfatal injuries in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). However, belted passengers still contribute to more than 40% of all MVC fatalities. The likelihood of severe injuries and fatalities is significantly greater in rollover crashes. The motivation behind this research is to address some of the contributing factors related to belted rollover fatalities. In the United States, they contribute to about 3% of all motor vehicle crashes but account for almost 30% of all fatalities. The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of adults to unlatch a push-button seat belt buckle in a rolled-over orientation. Fifty-five (55) out of sixty (60) subjects in this study (92%) were able to unlatch their seat belt while in a rolled-over orientation. However, 96% of the female subjects and 83% of the male subjects were unable to exert enough force to exceed the force requirement of 133N specified in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 209 at any given orientation. For male subjects, a reduction of almost 22%, and for female subjects, a reduction of almost 13% in the mean push force from upright to rolled-over orientation was observed. Results of the study suggest that reducing the maximum buckle release force to 50 N would accommodate the strength capabilities of 95% of subjects to unlatch the seat belt buckle in any orientation. This study emphasizes the need for investigating seat belt standards and regulations, some of which have not been changed since their inception in 1965.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104505"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seat belts have been in use for nearly 140 years and have a proven track record to be the single most effective tool in reducing fatal and nonfatal injuries in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). However, belted passengers still contribute to more than 40% of all MVC fatalities. The likelihood of severe injuries and fatalities is significantly greater in rollover crashes. The motivation behind this research is to address some of the contributing factors related to belted rollover fatalities. In the United States, they contribute to about 3% of all motor vehicle crashes but account for almost 30% of all fatalities. The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of adults to unlatch a push-button seat belt buckle in a rolled-over orientation. Fifty-five (55) out of sixty (60) subjects in this study (92%) were able to unlatch their seat belt while in a rolled-over orientation. However, 96% of the female subjects and 83% of the male subjects were unable to exert enough force to exceed the force requirement of 133N specified in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 209 at any given orientation. For male subjects, a reduction of almost 22%, and for female subjects, a reduction of almost 13% in the mean push force from upright to rolled-over orientation was observed. Results of the study suggest that reducing the maximum buckle release force to 50 N would accommodate the strength capabilities of 95% of subjects to unlatch the seat belt buckle in any orientation. This study emphasizes the need for investigating seat belt standards and regulations, some of which have not been changed since their inception in 1965.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Human slip perception while walking on ice: Can we rely on self-reported slip counts for winter footwear evaluations? Applying multiscale entropy for evaluating website visual complexity in an agile project: Using physiological data Analysis of seat belt buckle release forces in post-rollover scenarios: Implications for passenger safety Augmented reality head-mounted display at–sea use causes cybersickness Kinematic effects of a back-assistance exoskeleton during human locomotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1