Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2025.103307
Dong Liang , Shuyuan Zhu , Jinxing Xie , Wanshan Zhu , Xiaobo Zhao
{"title":"Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?","authors":"Dong Liang ,&nbsp;Shuyuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Jinxing Xie ,&nbsp;Wanshan Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaobo Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study two prevalent business strategies: collective buying and referral reward strategies, leveraging social interactions among consumers to incentivize purchases through discounts or rewards. Consumers exhibit heterogeneity in their awareness of the product. Aware consumers pursue discounts or rewards by inviting their peers, which can increase the unaware peers’ valuation of this product. In the collective buying strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and collective buying discounts. Consumers have the option to make individual purchases or form groups. The final demand is contingent on the equilibrium of a Nash game, in which consumers form groups through invitations. In equilibrium, the optimal collective buying strategy proves to be more profitable than the posted price strategy (where consumers can only purchase individually) when the social cost of inviting is moderate, the fraction of aware consumers is not overly large, and the additional value is not negligible. Notably, the lowest collective buying discount arises when the social cost, the fraction of aware consumers, and the additional value are all at moderate levels. In the referral reward strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and rewards for successful recommendations. We derive the optimal referral reward strategy and further scrutinize the optimal retail strategy by comparing the posted price strategy, collective buying strategy, and referral reward strategy. Our comprehensive analysis reveals non-monotonic shifts in the optimal retail strategy as various parameters change, some of which appear to be novel and unreported in the existing literature. Finally, we extend our collective-buying model to address a scenario where the social cost and consumers’ valuations are continuous.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103307"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study two prevalent business strategies: collective buying and referral reward strategies, leveraging social interactions among consumers to incentivize purchases through discounts or rewards. Consumers exhibit heterogeneity in their awareness of the product. Aware consumers pursue discounts or rewards by inviting their peers, which can increase the unaware peers’ valuation of this product. In the collective buying strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and collective buying discounts. Consumers have the option to make individual purchases or form groups. The final demand is contingent on the equilibrium of a Nash game, in which consumers form groups through invitations. In equilibrium, the optimal collective buying strategy proves to be more profitable than the posted price strategy (where consumers can only purchase individually) when the social cost of inviting is moderate, the fraction of aware consumers is not overly large, and the additional value is not negligible. Notably, the lowest collective buying discount arises when the social cost, the fraction of aware consumers, and the additional value are all at moderate levels. In the referral reward strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and rewards for successful recommendations. We derive the optimal referral reward strategy and further scrutinize the optimal retail strategy by comparing the posted price strategy, collective buying strategy, and referral reward strategy. Our comprehensive analysis reveals non-monotonic shifts in the optimal retail strategy as various parameters change, some of which appear to be novel and unreported in the existing literature. Finally, we extend our collective-buying model to address a scenario where the social cost and consumers’ valuations are continuous.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们研究了两种流行的商业策略:集体购买和推荐奖励策略,它们利用消费者之间的社交互动,通过折扣或奖励来刺激购买。消费者对产品的认知存在异质性。认知度高的消费者通过邀请同伴追求折扣或奖励,这可以提高不认知的同伴对该产品的评价。在集体购买策略中,零售商决定个人购买价格和集体购买折扣。消费者可以选择个人购买或组成集体购买。最终需求取决于纳什博弈的均衡,即消费者通过邀请组成团体。在均衡状态下,当邀请的社会成本适中、有意识的消费者比例不过大、额外价值不可忽略时,最优的集体购买策略比公布价格策略(消费者只能单独购买)更有利可图。值得注意的是,当社会成本、知晓消费者比例和额外价值都处于中等水平时,集体购买折扣最低。在推荐奖励策略中,零售商同时决定个人购买价格和成功推荐的奖励。我们推导出了最优推荐奖励策略,并通过比较公布价格策略、集体购买策略和推荐奖励策略,进一步研究了最优零售策略。我们的综合分析表明,随着各种参数的变化,最优零售策略也会发生非单调的变化,其中一些似乎是新颖的,在现有文献中也未见报道。最后,我们扩展了我们的集体购买模型,以解决社会成本和消费者价值是连续的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
Levying carbon tariffs considering foreign competition and technology choice Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you? Lean operations and firm resilience - contrasting effects of COVID-19 and economic recession Editorial Board When and how to introduce live streaming for video game? Consumers’ trade-off between buying and watching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1