Fully automatic categorical analysis of striatal subregions in dopamine transporter SPECT using a convolutional neural network.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Annals of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s12149-025-02038-3
Thomas Buddenkotte, Catharina Lange, Susanne Klutmann, Ivayla Apostolova, Ralph Buchert
{"title":"Fully automatic categorical analysis of striatal subregions in dopamine transporter SPECT using a convolutional neural network.","authors":"Thomas Buddenkotte, Catharina Lange, Susanne Klutmann, Ivayla Apostolova, Ralph Buchert","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02038-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide fully automatic scanner-independent 5-level categorization of the [<sup>123</sup>I]FP-CIT uptake in striatal subregions in dopamine transporter SPECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3500 [<sup>123</sup>I]FP-CIT SPECT scans from two in house (n = 1740, n = 640) and two external (n = 645, n = 475) datasets were used for this study. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained for the categorization of the [<sup>123</sup>I]FP-CIT uptake in unilateral caudate and putamen in both hemispheres according to 5 levels: normal, borderline, moderate reduction, strong reduction, almost missing. Reference standard labels for the network training were created automatically by fitting a Gaussian mixture model to histograms of the specific [<sup>123</sup>I]FP-CIT binding ratio, separately for caudate and putamen and separately for each dataset. The CNN was trained on a mixed-scanner subsample (n = 1957) and tested on one independent identically distributed (IID, n = 1068) and one out-of-distribution (OOD, n = 475) test dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the CNN for the 5-level prediction of the [<sup>123</sup>I]FP-CIT uptake in caudate/putamen was 80.1/78.0% in the IID test dataset and 78.1/76.5% in the OOD test dataset. All 4 regional 5-level predictions were correct in 54.3/52.6% of the cases in the IID/OOD test dataset. A global binary score automatically derived from the regional 5-scores achieved 97.4/96.2% accuracy for automatic classification of the scans as normal or reduced relative to visual expert read as reference standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automatic scanner-independent 5-level categorization of the [<sup>123</sup>I]FP-CIT uptake in striatal subregions by a CNN model is feasible with clinically useful accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02038-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide fully automatic scanner-independent 5-level categorization of the [123I]FP-CIT uptake in striatal subregions in dopamine transporter SPECT.

Methods: A total of 3500 [123I]FP-CIT SPECT scans from two in house (n = 1740, n = 640) and two external (n = 645, n = 475) datasets were used for this study. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained for the categorization of the [123I]FP-CIT uptake in unilateral caudate and putamen in both hemispheres according to 5 levels: normal, borderline, moderate reduction, strong reduction, almost missing. Reference standard labels for the network training were created automatically by fitting a Gaussian mixture model to histograms of the specific [123I]FP-CIT binding ratio, separately for caudate and putamen and separately for each dataset. The CNN was trained on a mixed-scanner subsample (n = 1957) and tested on one independent identically distributed (IID, n = 1068) and one out-of-distribution (OOD, n = 475) test dataset.

Results: The accuracy of the CNN for the 5-level prediction of the [123I]FP-CIT uptake in caudate/putamen was 80.1/78.0% in the IID test dataset and 78.1/76.5% in the OOD test dataset. All 4 regional 5-level predictions were correct in 54.3/52.6% of the cases in the IID/OOD test dataset. A global binary score automatically derived from the regional 5-scores achieved 97.4/96.2% accuracy for automatic classification of the scans as normal or reduced relative to visual expert read as reference standard.

Conclusions: Automatic scanner-independent 5-level categorization of the [123I]FP-CIT uptake in striatal subregions by a CNN model is feasible with clinically useful accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Fully automatic categorical analysis of striatal subregions in dopamine transporter SPECT using a convolutional neural network. Metabolic tumor parameters on 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict the expression of PD-L1 and prognosis in patients with fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Pulmonary blood flow quantification in humans from 15O-water PET. Deep learning in nuclear medicine: from imaging to therapy. FAPI radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear oncology and theranostics of solid tumours: are we nearer to surrounding the hallmarks of cancer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1