Global urban green spaces in the functional urban areas: Spatial pattern, drivers and size hierarchy

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128770
Lai Wei, Zhenhuan Liu, Yi Zhou, Zhiwen Tao, Fan Yang
{"title":"Global urban green spaces in the functional urban areas: Spatial pattern, drivers and size hierarchy","authors":"Lai Wei,&nbsp;Zhenhuan Liu,&nbsp;Yi Zhou,&nbsp;Zhiwen Tao,&nbsp;Fan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green spaces (UGS) play a vital role in the urban eco-environment and are essential for human well-being. However, the spatial heterogeneity and size hierarchy of UGS, as well as the driving factors in geographically remain unclear. This study applies the rank-size law to elucidate the multi-scale distribution patterns of UGS in functional urban areas worldwide. Subsequently, the gradient boosted regression tree method was used to quantitatively analyze the contributions and thresholds of natural environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing UGS. The results indicate that: (1) Globally, the top 20 % of cities in terms of UGS area represent nearly 60 % of the total urban green space. Developed regions like North America and Europe tend to have more extensive and larger UGS, whereas developing and rapidly urbanizing regions like Asia and Africa have more compact and smaller green spaces. (2) The rank-size distribution of UGS can be explained to some extent by Pareto's law and the size hierarchies of UGS and FUAs are highly consistent. (3) Area of UGS is more closely related to urban area rather than the population it serves. (4) Socioeconomic factors have a significant impact on UGS, exerting a dominant influence on both UGS area (UGSA) and per capita UGS area (PUGSA). Specifically, the human development index and impervious surface percentage contribute 61.51 % to UGSA, with all socioeconomic factors collectively contributing up to 68.59 %. For PUGSA, socioeconomic factors contribute 63.07 %, while three natural environmental factors contribute less than 37 %. These findings offer valuable insights for urban ecological construction aimed at promoting sustainable urban development, ensuring equitable green space resource allocation, and enhancing urban living environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128770"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGS) play a vital role in the urban eco-environment and are essential for human well-being. However, the spatial heterogeneity and size hierarchy of UGS, as well as the driving factors in geographically remain unclear. This study applies the rank-size law to elucidate the multi-scale distribution patterns of UGS in functional urban areas worldwide. Subsequently, the gradient boosted regression tree method was used to quantitatively analyze the contributions and thresholds of natural environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing UGS. The results indicate that: (1) Globally, the top 20 % of cities in terms of UGS area represent nearly 60 % of the total urban green space. Developed regions like North America and Europe tend to have more extensive and larger UGS, whereas developing and rapidly urbanizing regions like Asia and Africa have more compact and smaller green spaces. (2) The rank-size distribution of UGS can be explained to some extent by Pareto's law and the size hierarchies of UGS and FUAs are highly consistent. (3) Area of UGS is more closely related to urban area rather than the population it serves. (4) Socioeconomic factors have a significant impact on UGS, exerting a dominant influence on both UGS area (UGSA) and per capita UGS area (PUGSA). Specifically, the human development index and impervious surface percentage contribute 61.51 % to UGSA, with all socioeconomic factors collectively contributing up to 68.59 %. For PUGSA, socioeconomic factors contribute 63.07 %, while three natural environmental factors contribute less than 37 %. These findings offer valuable insights for urban ecological construction aimed at promoting sustainable urban development, ensuring equitable green space resource allocation, and enhancing urban living environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球城市功能区绿地:空间格局、驱动因素和规模层次
城市绿地在城市生态环境中起着至关重要的作用,对人类福祉至关重要。然而,UGS的空间异质性、规模层次及其地理驱动因素尚不清楚。本研究运用秩-规模法则来阐明全球功能城区UGS的多尺度分布格局。随后,采用梯度增强回归树方法定量分析了影响UGS的自然环境和社会经济因素的贡献和阈值。结果表明:(1)全球UGS面积排名前20位 %的城市占城市绿地总面积的近60% %;北美和欧洲等发达地区往往拥有更广泛和更大的UGS,而亚洲和非洲等发展中和快速城市化的地区则拥有更紧凑和更小的绿色空间。(2) UGS的等级-规模分布在一定程度上可以用Pareto定律解释,UGS和FUAs的规模层次高度一致。(3) UGS的面积与城市面积的关系比与服务人口的关系更密切。(4)社会经济因素对UGS具有显著影响,对UGS面积(UGSA)和人均UGS面积(PUGSA)均具有显性影响。其中,人类发展指数和不透水地表百分比对地表总面积的贡献率为61.51 %,社会经济因素对地表总面积的贡献率为68.59 %。对于PUGSA,社会经济因素的贡献为63.07 %,而三个自然环境因素的贡献小于37 %。研究结果对促进城市可持续发展、保障绿地资源合理配置、改善城市人居环境等方面的城市生态建设具有重要的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
期刊最新文献
The urban greening paradox: Measuring day-night perceived safety divergences from paired street view images using Generative AI Integrated Deep Learning Framework for Automating Tree Health Assessment Using Ground-Based Images Patterns of urban green cover and green volume depend on land ownership in Munich, Germany Urban and peri-urban green space use in two racialized neighborhoods of Barcelona, Spain Hyper-local social and ecological factors correlate with public tree distributions across Washington, DC: Implications for equitable ecosystem service provisioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1