Global urban green spaces in the functional urban areas: Spatial pattern, drivers and size hierarchy

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128770
Lai Wei, Zhenhuan Liu, Yi Zhou, Zhiwen Tao, Fan Yang
{"title":"Global urban green spaces in the functional urban areas: Spatial pattern, drivers and size hierarchy","authors":"Lai Wei,&nbsp;Zhenhuan Liu,&nbsp;Yi Zhou,&nbsp;Zhiwen Tao,&nbsp;Fan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green spaces (UGS) play a vital role in the urban eco-environment and are essential for human well-being. However, the spatial heterogeneity and size hierarchy of UGS, as well as the driving factors in geographically remain unclear. This study applies the rank-size law to elucidate the multi-scale distribution patterns of UGS in functional urban areas worldwide. Subsequently, the gradient boosted regression tree method was used to quantitatively analyze the contributions and thresholds of natural environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing UGS. The results indicate that: (1) Globally, the top 20 % of cities in terms of UGS area represent nearly 60 % of the total urban green space. Developed regions like North America and Europe tend to have more extensive and larger UGS, whereas developing and rapidly urbanizing regions like Asia and Africa have more compact and smaller green spaces. (2) The rank-size distribution of UGS can be explained to some extent by Pareto's law and the size hierarchies of UGS and FUAs are highly consistent. (3) Area of UGS is more closely related to urban area rather than the population it serves. (4) Socioeconomic factors have a significant impact on UGS, exerting a dominant influence on both UGS area (UGSA) and per capita UGS area (PUGSA). Specifically, the human development index and impervious surface percentage contribute 61.51 % to UGSA, with all socioeconomic factors collectively contributing up to 68.59 %. For PUGSA, socioeconomic factors contribute 63.07 %, while three natural environmental factors contribute less than 37 %. These findings offer valuable insights for urban ecological construction aimed at promoting sustainable urban development, ensuring equitable green space resource allocation, and enhancing urban living environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128770"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGS) play a vital role in the urban eco-environment and are essential for human well-being. However, the spatial heterogeneity and size hierarchy of UGS, as well as the driving factors in geographically remain unclear. This study applies the rank-size law to elucidate the multi-scale distribution patterns of UGS in functional urban areas worldwide. Subsequently, the gradient boosted regression tree method was used to quantitatively analyze the contributions and thresholds of natural environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing UGS. The results indicate that: (1) Globally, the top 20 % of cities in terms of UGS area represent nearly 60 % of the total urban green space. Developed regions like North America and Europe tend to have more extensive and larger UGS, whereas developing and rapidly urbanizing regions like Asia and Africa have more compact and smaller green spaces. (2) The rank-size distribution of UGS can be explained to some extent by Pareto's law and the size hierarchies of UGS and FUAs are highly consistent. (3) Area of UGS is more closely related to urban area rather than the population it serves. (4) Socioeconomic factors have a significant impact on UGS, exerting a dominant influence on both UGS area (UGSA) and per capita UGS area (PUGSA). Specifically, the human development index and impervious surface percentage contribute 61.51 % to UGSA, with all socioeconomic factors collectively contributing up to 68.59 %. For PUGSA, socioeconomic factors contribute 63.07 %, while three natural environmental factors contribute less than 37 %. These findings offer valuable insights for urban ecological construction aimed at promoting sustainable urban development, ensuring equitable green space resource allocation, and enhancing urban living environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
期刊最新文献
Green space visitation: A capacity builder for self-perceived health and subjective wellbeing among urban citizens Global urban green spaces in the functional urban areas: Spatial pattern, drivers and size hierarchy Adaptive ranking of specific tree species for targeted green infrastructure intervention in response to urban hazards Sustainability in urban agriculture: The role of biochar in enhancing the productive capacity of compost-based growing media for rooftop farming Understanding the factors driving species composition similarity of urban spontaneous plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1