Performance assessment of machine learning techniques in electronic nose systems for power transformer fault detection

IF 9.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Energy and AI Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100497
Sergi Torres Araya , Jorge Ardila-Rey , Matías Cerda Luna , Jorge Portilla , Suganya Govindarajan , Camilo Alvear Jorquera , Roger Schurch
{"title":"Performance assessment of machine learning techniques in electronic nose systems for power transformer fault detection","authors":"Sergi Torres Araya ,&nbsp;Jorge Ardila-Rey ,&nbsp;Matías Cerda Luna ,&nbsp;Jorge Portilla ,&nbsp;Suganya Govindarajan ,&nbsp;Camilo Alvear Jorquera ,&nbsp;Roger Schurch","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil-filled transformers are critical assets in electrical power systems, both economically and operationally. Their condition is assessed through insulation system, which is greatly affected by various degradation mechanisms. Hence, effective fault diagnosis is essential to prolong their lifespan. Early detection and correction of incipient faults through Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) are crucial to prevent irreversible damage. Current measurement systems have significant limitations that impede their use in routine monitoring and underscore the need for new, accessible technologies that are both technically and economically viable to efficiently detect incipient faults.</div><div>This study evaluates the performance of various Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict the concentrations of hydrogen (H₂), methane (CH₄), acetylene (C₂H₂), ethylene (C₂H₄), and ethane (C₂H₆) in oil samples subjected to different types of electrical faults, using data from a novel electronic nose (E-Nose) equipped with eleven MOS-type gas sensors. The evaluated ML techniques include Linear Regression (LR), Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR). Experimental results from 218 measurement processes revealed that RFR and MLP models exhibited superior performance, with RFR achieving the highest accuracy for predicting H₂, C₂H₂, and C₂H₆, while MLP excelled for CH₄ and C₂H₄. A comparison with a commercial DGA system using the Duval Pentagon Method confirmed the effectiveness of these models in diagnosing transformer faults. These findings underscore the potential of combining E-Noses with ML techniques as an innovative and efficient solution for early fault diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546825000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil-filled transformers are critical assets in electrical power systems, both economically and operationally. Their condition is assessed through insulation system, which is greatly affected by various degradation mechanisms. Hence, effective fault diagnosis is essential to prolong their lifespan. Early detection and correction of incipient faults through Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) are crucial to prevent irreversible damage. Current measurement systems have significant limitations that impede their use in routine monitoring and underscore the need for new, accessible technologies that are both technically and economically viable to efficiently detect incipient faults.
This study evaluates the performance of various Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict the concentrations of hydrogen (H₂), methane (CH₄), acetylene (C₂H₂), ethylene (C₂H₄), and ethane (C₂H₆) in oil samples subjected to different types of electrical faults, using data from a novel electronic nose (E-Nose) equipped with eleven MOS-type gas sensors. The evaluated ML techniques include Linear Regression (LR), Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR). Experimental results from 218 measurement processes revealed that RFR and MLP models exhibited superior performance, with RFR achieving the highest accuracy for predicting H₂, C₂H₂, and C₂H₆, while MLP excelled for CH₄ and C₂H₄. A comparison with a commercial DGA system using the Duval Pentagon Method confirmed the effectiveness of these models in diagnosing transformer faults. These findings underscore the potential of combining E-Noses with ML techniques as an innovative and efficient solution for early fault diagnosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Human-in-the-loop control strategy for IoT-based smart thermostats with Deep Reinforcement Learning Physics-constrained transfer learning: Open-circuit voltage curve reconstruction and degradation mode estimation of lithium-ion batteries Performance assessment of machine learning techniques in electronic nose systems for power transformer fault detection A comparative framework for evaluating machine learning models in forecasting electricity demand for port microgrids Probabilistic ultra-short-term solar photovoltaic power forecasting using natural gradient boosting with attention-enhanced neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1