How to validate a didactic and methodological structure for online and blended executive courses

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101166
Ledian Valle Mestre, Caridad García Escribano
{"title":"How to validate a didactic and methodological structure for online and blended executive courses","authors":"Ledian Valle Mestre,&nbsp;Caridad García Escribano","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This paper aims to validate the feasibility and relevance of the didactic and methodological structure developed to deliver Online and Blended courses in a rapidly evolving educational landscape.</div></div><div><h3>Theoretical framework</h3><div>The study has developed and validated a didactic and methodological structure for online and executive courses based on the Behaviourist Learning Theory, which emphasises the role of stimuli and responses in learning, and the Constructivist Theory, which focuses on the learner's active role in constructing knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The study employed a comprehensive approach, using three methods (Delphi, Focus Group and Triangulation) to validate the feasibility and relevance of the didactic and methodological proposals. This validation is not an isolated event; instead, it is a direct consequence of the design and implementation of the didactic and methodological structure process. Thus, this multi-method approach ensures the robustness of our findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results/implications</h3><div>The results confirm the feasibility and relevance of the didactic and methodological structure. These results will contribute to the literature by presenting a didactic and methodological structure for delivering online and blended courses. Additionally, the study offers a practical, step-by-step process to create this type of structure for online and blended courses and a dynamic, participatory and robust methodology to enhance the effectiveness of academic management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"23 2","pages":"Article 101166"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811725000369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This paper aims to validate the feasibility and relevance of the didactic and methodological structure developed to deliver Online and Blended courses in a rapidly evolving educational landscape.

Theoretical framework

The study has developed and validated a didactic and methodological structure for online and executive courses based on the Behaviourist Learning Theory, which emphasises the role of stimuli and responses in learning, and the Constructivist Theory, which focuses on the learner's active role in constructing knowledge.

Methodology

The study employed a comprehensive approach, using three methods (Delphi, Focus Group and Triangulation) to validate the feasibility and relevance of the didactic and methodological proposals. This validation is not an isolated event; instead, it is a direct consequence of the design and implementation of the didactic and methodological structure process. Thus, this multi-method approach ensures the robustness of our findings.

Results/implications

The results confirm the feasibility and relevance of the didactic and methodological structure. These results will contribute to the literature by presenting a didactic and methodological structure for delivering online and blended courses. Additionally, the study offers a practical, step-by-step process to create this type of structure for online and blended courses and a dynamic, participatory and robust methodology to enhance the effectiveness of academic management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何验证在线和混合行政课程的教学和方法结构
本文旨在验证在快速发展的教育环境中开发的在线和混合课程的教学和方法结构的可行性和相关性。理论框架:该研究开发并验证了基于行为主义学习理论和建构主义理论的在线课程和行政课程的教学和方法结构。行为主义学习理论强调刺激和反应在学习中的作用,建构主义学习理论关注学习者在构建知识中的积极作用。本研究采用综合方法,使用三种方法(德尔菲、焦点小组和三角测量)来验证教学和方法建议的可行性和相关性。这种验证并不是一个孤立的事件;相反,它是教学和方法论结构过程的设计和实施的直接结果。因此,这种多方法方法确保了我们研究结果的稳健性。结果/意义结果证实了教学和方法结构的可行性和相关性。这些结果将通过呈现在线和混合课程的教学和方法结构来为文献做出贡献。此外,该研究提供了一个实用的、循序渐进的过程,为在线和混合课程创建这种类型的结构,并提供了一个动态的、参与式的、强有力的方法,以提高学术管理的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Teaching works—Support matters: Lessons for management education from student evidence Does the entrepreneurship environment in higher education give entrepreneurial intent to start a Business? Evidence from universities in Indonesia The confidence to feel: Teaching emotional self-efficacy through experiential learning How learners think and act in simulations: A multi-study analysis Influence of entrepreneurship education and business startup initiatives: Evidence from Ghanaian Technical University business students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1