Tree species identity modifies the efficiency of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes in temperate mountain forests

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122616
Dina Emrich , Lena Gustafsson , Stefan Kaufmann , Markus Hauck
{"title":"Tree species identity modifies the efficiency of habitat tree retention for conserving epiphytes in temperate mountain forests","authors":"Dina Emrich ,&nbsp;Lena Gustafsson ,&nbsp;Stefan Kaufmann ,&nbsp;Markus Hauck","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest ecosystems play an outstanding role in supporting diverse bryophyte and lichen communities. However, intensive forest management has led to a considerable decline of epiphyte communities, which are sensitive to the simplification of forest stands and the interruption of stand continuity. Retention forestry, which originally aimed to conserve important structural elements for biodiversity after clearcut, has more recently also been incorporated into continuous-cover forestry in temperate European forests. As both management systems differ from each other, it is difficult to transfer findings to the efficiency of retention measures for biodiversity conservation from clearcut to continuous-cover management systems. Therefore, we studied how habitat trees retained in continuous-cover forestry in temperate mountain forests of Germany dominated by <em>Fagus sylvatica</em>, <em>Picea abies</em>, and <em>Abies alba</em> would benefit epiphytic bryophytes and lichens. We analysed the epiphyte vegetation on 1254 trees in 132 forest stands. We compared large-sized habitat retention trees (HT) and smaller-sized average trees (AT). We detected a significantly higher species richness on HT, which was more strongly driven by lichens than by bryophytes. Even stronger increases in Simpson and Shannon diversity suggested that these increases in richness were due to increased population sizes of several species and not due to the addition of few individuals of few species. Strong variability in the response of epiphyte diversity occurred between tree species, with bryophytes being particularly favored by <em>F. sylvatica</em> and lichens by <em>A. alba</em>. Retention of HT is thus a suitable tool to conserve epiphytes in Central European temperate forests, even after blind selection of HT without consideration of the epiphyte vegetation before tree selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"585 ","pages":"Article 122616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725001240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest ecosystems play an outstanding role in supporting diverse bryophyte and lichen communities. However, intensive forest management has led to a considerable decline of epiphyte communities, which are sensitive to the simplification of forest stands and the interruption of stand continuity. Retention forestry, which originally aimed to conserve important structural elements for biodiversity after clearcut, has more recently also been incorporated into continuous-cover forestry in temperate European forests. As both management systems differ from each other, it is difficult to transfer findings to the efficiency of retention measures for biodiversity conservation from clearcut to continuous-cover management systems. Therefore, we studied how habitat trees retained in continuous-cover forestry in temperate mountain forests of Germany dominated by Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies, and Abies alba would benefit epiphytic bryophytes and lichens. We analysed the epiphyte vegetation on 1254 trees in 132 forest stands. We compared large-sized habitat retention trees (HT) and smaller-sized average trees (AT). We detected a significantly higher species richness on HT, which was more strongly driven by lichens than by bryophytes. Even stronger increases in Simpson and Shannon diversity suggested that these increases in richness were due to increased population sizes of several species and not due to the addition of few individuals of few species. Strong variability in the response of epiphyte diversity occurred between tree species, with bryophytes being particularly favored by F. sylvatica and lichens by A. alba. Retention of HT is thus a suitable tool to conserve epiphytes in Central European temperate forests, even after blind selection of HT without consideration of the epiphyte vegetation before tree selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树种特性改变了生境树木保留对温带山林附生植物保护的效率
森林生态系统在支持多种苔藓和地衣群落方面发挥着突出的作用。然而,森林集约化经营导致附生植物群落数量明显减少,对林分简化和林分连续性中断十分敏感。保留森林最初的目的是在砍伐后保护生物多样性的重要结构要素,最近也被纳入欧洲温带森林的连续覆盖森林。由于两种管理制度之间存在差异,因此很难将研究结果转化为生物多样性保护保留措施的效率。因此,我们研究了德国温带山林中以柴木、云杉和白冷杉为主的连续覆盖林中保留的生境树木对附生苔藓植物和地衣的有益作用。对132个林分1254棵乔木的附生植被进行了分析。我们比较了大型生境保留树(HT)和小型平均树(AT)。地衣比苔藓植物对物种丰富度的影响更大。辛普森和香农多样性的更强增长表明,这些丰富度的增加是由于几个物种的种群规模的增加,而不是由于少数物种的少数个体的增加。对附生植物多样性的响应在不同树种间存在较大的差异,其中青苔植物尤其受林分木(F. sylvatica)的青睐,地衣植物则受白杨(A. alba)的青睐。因此,保留高温是中欧温带森林中保护附生植物的合适工具,即使在树木选择之前不考虑附生植物植被的情况下盲目选择高温。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Responses of understory plant diversity to fire regimes in temperate forests Effects of different stand densities and pruning on timber volume and ecosystem carbon sink in subtropical secondary forests: A Case study from Zhejiang Province, China Decoupling of overstory and understory composition in an African tropical rainforest suggests declining tree diversity Developing transfer functions for impact-abundance relationships in defoliating geometrid moths Root system architecture and uprooting resistance of Pinus thunbergii regenerated on anthropogenic embankments used as growing bases after tsunami disaster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1