Productivity of mixed plantations of ash and larch in northeastern China – a model-based analysis

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122609
Lihu Dong , Qing Wang , Xingji Jin , Timo Pukkala , Fengri Li
{"title":"Productivity of mixed plantations of ash and larch in northeastern China – a model-based analysis","authors":"Lihu Dong ,&nbsp;Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Xingji Jin ,&nbsp;Timo Pukkala ,&nbsp;Fengri Li","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mixed forests are favored in forest management because of their higher biodiversity and resilience than pure stands. The productivity of a mixed stand may be better than the average of monospecific stands of those species that form the mixed stand. In northeastern China, most plantation forests are monocultures, but mixed plantations are also increasingly established. Several experiments of planted mixtures of Changbai larch (<em>Larix olgensis</em>) and Manchurian ash (<em>Fraxinus mandshurica</em>) have been established in the Heilongjiang province of northeastern China. This study analyzed the growth and mortality of the trees in these experiments at ages 15–30 years. Both distance-dependent and distance-independent tree-level models for diameter increment and mortality were developed. The analyses showed that competition indices calculated from tree heights performed better than indices based on trunk diameters, indicating the importance of competition for light. The models suggested that ash benefits from a larch admixture, but larch does not benefit from the presence of ashes. Simulations conducted using the models showed that, at stand ages of 15–30 years, ash stands were more productive than mixed or pure larch stands. Because the two species performed differently in different experiments and plots, no overall conclusions could be drawn about the overyielding or under-yielding of mixed stands. In some sites, the mixture may be more productive than the average of pure stands, but this conclusion cannot be generalized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"585 ","pages":"Article 122609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725001173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed forests are favored in forest management because of their higher biodiversity and resilience than pure stands. The productivity of a mixed stand may be better than the average of monospecific stands of those species that form the mixed stand. In northeastern China, most plantation forests are monocultures, but mixed plantations are also increasingly established. Several experiments of planted mixtures of Changbai larch (Larix olgensis) and Manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) have been established in the Heilongjiang province of northeastern China. This study analyzed the growth and mortality of the trees in these experiments at ages 15–30 years. Both distance-dependent and distance-independent tree-level models for diameter increment and mortality were developed. The analyses showed that competition indices calculated from tree heights performed better than indices based on trunk diameters, indicating the importance of competition for light. The models suggested that ash benefits from a larch admixture, but larch does not benefit from the presence of ashes. Simulations conducted using the models showed that, at stand ages of 15–30 years, ash stands were more productive than mixed or pure larch stands. Because the two species performed differently in different experiments and plots, no overall conclusions could be drawn about the overyielding or under-yielding of mixed stands. In some sites, the mixture may be more productive than the average of pure stands, but this conclusion cannot be generalized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东北白杨与落叶松混交林生产力的模型分析
混交林具有比纯林分更高的生物多样性和恢复力,在森林经营中受到青睐。混交林的生产力可能比组成混交林的那些物种的单种林分的平均生产力要好。在中国东北,大多数人工林是单一栽培,但混合人工林也越来越多。在黑龙江省建立了长白落叶松(Larix olgensis)与满洲白蜡(Fraxinus mandshurica)杂交种植试验。本研究分析了这些试验中15-30年树木的生长和死亡率。建立了与距离相关和与距离无关的树级模型。分析表明,以树高计算的竞争指数优于以树干直径计算的竞争指数,说明了光竞争的重要性。这些模型表明,灰烬从落叶松的混合物中受益,但落叶松不会从灰烬的存在中受益。利用模型进行的模拟表明,在15-30年的林龄下,灰分林分比混合或纯落叶松林分的生产力更高。由于两种在不同试验和样地的表现不同,混交林的高产或低产不能得出全面的结论。在某些地点,混合林分的产量可能高于纯林分的平均产量,但这一结论不能一概而论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Responses of understory plant diversity to fire regimes in temperate forests Effects of different stand densities and pruning on timber volume and ecosystem carbon sink in subtropical secondary forests: A Case study from Zhejiang Province, China Decoupling of overstory and understory composition in an African tropical rainforest suggests declining tree diversity Developing transfer functions for impact-abundance relationships in defoliating geometrid moths Root system architecture and uprooting resistance of Pinus thunbergii regenerated on anthropogenic embankments used as growing bases after tsunami disaster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1