EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes (FEZ), Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L. M. Solano, Monika Sramkova, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Jaime Aguilera, Daniele Cavanna, Cristina Fernández-Fraguas, Roos Anna de Nijs, Yi Liu
{"title":"Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP-Ezd119","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes (FEZ), Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L. M. Solano, Monika Sramkova, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Jaime Aguilera, Daniele Cavanna, Cristina Fernández-Fraguas, Roos Anna de Nijs, Yi Liu","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase (4-β-D-xylan xylanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.8) is produced with the genetically modified <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain DP-Ezd119 by Genencor International B.V. The production strain meets the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme was considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in the processing of cereals and other grains for the production of baked products. Dietary exposure was estimated to be up to 0.085 mg total organic solids/kg body weight per day in European populations. Given the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of concerns resulting from the food enzyme manufacturing process, toxicity tests were considered unnecessary by the Panel. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the endo-1,4-β-xylanase to known allergens was made, and no match was found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase (4-β-D-xylan xylanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.8) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain DP-Ezd119 by Genencor International B.V. The production strain meets the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme was considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in the processing of cereals and other grains for the production of baked products. Dietary exposure was estimated to be up to 0.085 mg total organic solids/kg body weight per day in European populations. Given the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of concerns resulting from the food enzyme manufacturing process, toxicity tests were considered unnecessary by the Panel. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the endo-1,4-β-xylanase to known allergens was made, and no match was found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶(4-β- d -木聚糖木聚糖水解酶;EC 3.2.1.8)由Genencor International B.V.用转基因枯草芽孢杆菌DP-Ezd119菌株生产,生产菌株符合安全合格推定(QPS)方法的要求。基因改造不会引起安全问题。食用酶被认为不含生产生物体的活细胞及其DNA。该食品酶旨在用于谷物和其他谷物的加工,以生产烘焙产品。据估计,欧洲人群每天从饮食中摄入的有机固体总量可达0.085毫克/公斤体重。考虑到生产菌株的质量保证品状态和食品酶制造过程中不存在的问题,评估小组认为没有必要进行毒性测试。对内源性1,4-β-木聚糖酶的氨基酸序列与已知过敏原的同源性进行了搜索,未发现匹配。专家小组认为,不能排除通过饮食接触这种食物酶而产生过敏反应的风险,但这种可能性很低。根据所提供的数据,小组得出结论,这种食品酶在预期的使用条件下不会引起安全问题。
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.