Investigating the Efficacy of Different Berry Powders in Alleviating Texture and Nutritional Limitations in Gluten-Free Cakes

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Quality Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1155/jfq/8897828
Başak Öncel, Ümmügülsüm Turgay, Mehmet Sertaç Özer
{"title":"Investigating the Efficacy of Different Berry Powders in Alleviating Texture and Nutritional Limitations in Gluten-Free Cakes","authors":"Başak Öncel,&nbsp;Ümmügülsüm Turgay,&nbsp;Mehmet Sertaç Özer","doi":"10.1155/jfq/8897828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Nowadays, the increase in gluten-related diseases has raised the demand for gluten-free bakery products. However, these products often face technological, nutritional, and sensory quality issues. In this study, the functional properties of gluten-free cakes were improved by incorporating four different berry powders (raspberry, blackberry, strawberry, and black mulberry) at three different concentrations 2%, 4%, and 6%. The samples were evaluated based on their quality properties, and preference levels. Increasing the concentration of berry powders in the cake formulation resulted in a general decrease in specific volume, crude fiber, elasticity, cohesiveness, and moisture, whereas hardness and chewiness parameters increased (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Moreover, black mulberry significantly improved the bioactive properties of the cake compared to other berry powders, with increases in total phenolic content (118.25–248.25 mg GAE/100 g), antioxidant activity (209.1–992.6 mg Trolox/kg), and total monomeric anthocyanin (1.02–7.86 mg/kg). As the amount of berry powder increased, the <i>L</i> and <i>b</i> values decreased, while the <i>a</i> value increased. Based on the sensory analysis results, the control sample was the least favored, while the sample with 4% black mulberry powder was the most preferred by the panelists. Consequently, increasing the concentration of black mulberry powder improved the nutritional, textural, and sensory properties of gluten-free cakes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Quality","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jfq/8897828","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Quality","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jfq/8897828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, the increase in gluten-related diseases has raised the demand for gluten-free bakery products. However, these products often face technological, nutritional, and sensory quality issues. In this study, the functional properties of gluten-free cakes were improved by incorporating four different berry powders (raspberry, blackberry, strawberry, and black mulberry) at three different concentrations 2%, 4%, and 6%. The samples were evaluated based on their quality properties, and preference levels. Increasing the concentration of berry powders in the cake formulation resulted in a general decrease in specific volume, crude fiber, elasticity, cohesiveness, and moisture, whereas hardness and chewiness parameters increased (p < 0.05). Moreover, black mulberry significantly improved the bioactive properties of the cake compared to other berry powders, with increases in total phenolic content (118.25–248.25 mg GAE/100 g), antioxidant activity (209.1–992.6 mg Trolox/kg), and total monomeric anthocyanin (1.02–7.86 mg/kg). As the amount of berry powder increased, the L and b values decreased, while the a value increased. Based on the sensory analysis results, the control sample was the least favored, while the sample with 4% black mulberry powder was the most preferred by the panelists. Consequently, increasing the concentration of black mulberry powder improved the nutritional, textural, and sensory properties of gluten-free cakes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究不同浆果粉对改善无谷蛋白蛋糕质地和营养限制的功效
如今,麸质相关疾病的增加提高了对无麸质烘焙产品的需求。然而,这些产品往往面临技术、营养和感官质量问题。在这项研究中,通过添加四种不同的浆果粉(覆盆子、黑莓、草莓和黑桑葚),以三种不同的浓度(2%、4%和6%),改善了无麸质蛋糕的功能特性。根据样品的质量特性和偏好水平对其进行评估。随着浆果粉在蛋糕配方中的浓度的增加,蛋糕的比体积、粗纤维、弹性、黏结性和水分普遍降低,而硬度和咀嚼性参数增加(p <;0.05)。此外,与其他浆果粉相比,黑桑显著提高了饼的生物活性,总酚含量(118.25 ~ 248.25 mg GAE/100 g)、抗氧化活性(209.1 ~ 992.6 mg Trolox/kg)和总单体花青素(1.02 ~ 7.86 mg/kg)均显著提高。随着浆果粉用量的增加,L和b值降低,而a值升高。从感官分析结果来看,对照样品最不受欢迎,而添加4%黑桑粉的样品最受小组成员青睐。因此,增加黑桑粉的浓度可以改善无麸质蛋糕的营养、质地和感官特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Quality
Journal of Food Quality 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Food Quality is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles related to all aspects of food quality characteristics acceptable to consumers. The journal aims to provide a valuable resource for food scientists, nutritionists, food producers, the public health sector, and governmental and non-governmental agencies with an interest in food quality.
期刊最新文献
Gas Permeation as the Nexus of Food Safety and Sustainability in the Packaging Industry The Effect of Nanoliposomes of Achillea millefolium Essential Oil on the Shelf Life of Fresh Beef at Refrigerated Storage Biopolymer-Based Encapsulation Approach: The Effect of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Oil Carried by Chitosan on Fish Fillet Quality Tracing the Role of Bioactive Ingredients in Encapsulation Techniques for Sustainable Foods: A Bibliometric Analysis Assessment of Microbial Hazards and Their Risk Analysis in Six Popular Street Foods of Dhaka City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1