Lan Yao, Heliang Yin, Chengyuan Yang, Shuyan Han, Jiamin Ma, J Carolyn Graff, Cong-Yi Wang, Yan Jiao, Jiafu Ji, Weikuan Gu, Gang Wang
{"title":"GENERATING RESEARCH HYPOTHESES TO OVERCOME KEY CHALLENGES IN THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF COLORECTAL CANCER - FUTURE APPLICATION OF AI.","authors":"Lan Yao, Heliang Yin, Chengyuan Yang, Shuyan Han, Jiamin Ma, J Carolyn Graff, Cong-Yi Wang, Yan Jiao, Jiafu Ji, Weikuan Gu, Gang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We intend to explore the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 in generating innovative research hypotheses to address key challenges in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We asked ChatGPT to generate hypotheses focusing on three main challenges: improving screening accuracy, overcoming technological limitations, and identifying reliable biomarkers. The hypotheses were evaluated for novelty. The experimental plans provided by ChatGPT for selected hypotheses were assessed for completion and feasibility. As a result, ChatGPT generated a total of 65 hypotheses. ChatGPT rated all 65 hypotheses, with 25 hypotheses receiving the highest rating (5) and 40 hypotheses receiving a rating of 4 or lower. The research team evaluated a total of 65 hypotheses, assigning them the following grades: hypotheses were rated as excellent (Grade 5), 16 were deemed suitable (Grade 4), 31 were classified as satisfactory (Grade 3), 12 were identified as needing Improvement (Grade 2), and one was considered poor (Grade 1). Additionally, the study determined that 17 of the generated hypotheses had corresponding publications. Out of the three experimental plans assessed, one was rated excellent (5) for feasibility, while the others received good (4) and moderate (3) ratings. Predicted outcomes and alternative approaches were rated as good, with some areas requiring further improvement. Our data demonstrate that AI has the potential to revolutionize hypothesis generation in medical research, though further validation through experimental and clinical studies is needed. This study suggests that while AI can generate novel hypotheses, human expertise is essential for evaluating their practicality and relevance in scientific research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9506,"journal":{"name":"Cancer letters","volume":" ","pages":"217632"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We intend to explore the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 in generating innovative research hypotheses to address key challenges in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We asked ChatGPT to generate hypotheses focusing on three main challenges: improving screening accuracy, overcoming technological limitations, and identifying reliable biomarkers. The hypotheses were evaluated for novelty. The experimental plans provided by ChatGPT for selected hypotheses were assessed for completion and feasibility. As a result, ChatGPT generated a total of 65 hypotheses. ChatGPT rated all 65 hypotheses, with 25 hypotheses receiving the highest rating (5) and 40 hypotheses receiving a rating of 4 or lower. The research team evaluated a total of 65 hypotheses, assigning them the following grades: hypotheses were rated as excellent (Grade 5), 16 were deemed suitable (Grade 4), 31 were classified as satisfactory (Grade 3), 12 were identified as needing Improvement (Grade 2), and one was considered poor (Grade 1). Additionally, the study determined that 17 of the generated hypotheses had corresponding publications. Out of the three experimental plans assessed, one was rated excellent (5) for feasibility, while the others received good (4) and moderate (3) ratings. Predicted outcomes and alternative approaches were rated as good, with some areas requiring further improvement. Our data demonstrate that AI has the potential to revolutionize hypothesis generation in medical research, though further validation through experimental and clinical studies is needed. This study suggests that while AI can generate novel hypotheses, human expertise is essential for evaluating their practicality and relevance in scientific research.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Letters is a reputable international journal that serves as a platform for significant and original contributions in cancer research. The journal welcomes both full-length articles and Mini Reviews in the wide-ranging field of basic and translational oncology. Furthermore, it frequently presents Special Issues that shed light on current and topical areas in cancer research.
Cancer Letters is highly interested in various fundamental aspects that can cater to a diverse readership. These areas include the molecular genetics and cell biology of cancer, radiation biology, molecular pathology, hormones and cancer, viral oncology, metastasis, and chemoprevention. The journal actively focuses on experimental therapeutics, particularly the advancement of targeted therapies for personalized cancer medicine, such as metronomic chemotherapy.
By publishing groundbreaking research and promoting advancements in cancer treatments, Cancer Letters aims to actively contribute to the fight against cancer and the improvement of patient outcomes.