Generating research hypotheses to overcome key challenges in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer - Future application of AI

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer letters Pub Date : 2025-06-28 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217632
Lan Yao , Heliang Yin , Chengyuan Yang , Shuyan Han , Jiamin Ma , J. Carolyn Graff , Cong-Yi Wang , Yan Jiao , Jiafu Ji , Weikuan Gu , Gang Wang
{"title":"Generating research hypotheses to overcome key challenges in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer - Future application of AI","authors":"Lan Yao ,&nbsp;Heliang Yin ,&nbsp;Chengyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Shuyan Han ,&nbsp;Jiamin Ma ,&nbsp;J. Carolyn Graff ,&nbsp;Cong-Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Yan Jiao ,&nbsp;Jiafu Ji ,&nbsp;Weikuan Gu ,&nbsp;Gang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We intend to explore the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 in generating innovative research hypotheses to address key challenges in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We asked ChatGPT to generate hypotheses focusing on three main challenges: improving screening accuracy, overcoming technological limitations, and identifying reliable biomarkers. The hypotheses were evaluated for novelty. The experimental plans provided by ChatGPT for selected hypotheses were assessed for completion and feasibility. As a result, ChatGPT generated a total of 65 hypotheses. ChatGPT rated all 65 hypotheses, with 25 hypotheses receiving the highest rating (5) and 40 hypotheses receiving a rating of 4 or lower. The research team evaluated a total of 65 hypotheses, assigning them the following grades: hypotheses were rated as excellent (Grade 5), 16 were deemed suitable (Grade 4), 31 were classified as satisfactory (Grade 3), 12 were identified as needing Improvement (Grade 2), and one was considered poor (Grade 1). Additionally, the study determined that 17 of the generated hypotheses had corresponding publications. Out of the three experimental plans assessed, one was rated excellent (5) for feasibility, while the others received good (4) and moderate (3) ratings. Predicted outcomes and alternative approaches were rated as good, with some areas requiring further improvement. Our data demonstrate that AI has the potential to revolutionize hypothesis generation in medical research, though further validation through experimental and clinical studies is needed. This study suggests that while AI can generate novel hypotheses, human expertise is essential for evaluating their practicality and relevance in scientific research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9506,"journal":{"name":"Cancer letters","volume":"620 ","pages":"Article 217632"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438352500196X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We intend to explore the capability of ChatGPT 4.0 in generating innovative research hypotheses to address key challenges in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We asked ChatGPT to generate hypotheses focusing on three main challenges: improving screening accuracy, overcoming technological limitations, and identifying reliable biomarkers. The hypotheses were evaluated for novelty. The experimental plans provided by ChatGPT for selected hypotheses were assessed for completion and feasibility. As a result, ChatGPT generated a total of 65 hypotheses. ChatGPT rated all 65 hypotheses, with 25 hypotheses receiving the highest rating (5) and 40 hypotheses receiving a rating of 4 or lower. The research team evaluated a total of 65 hypotheses, assigning them the following grades: hypotheses were rated as excellent (Grade 5), 16 were deemed suitable (Grade 4), 31 were classified as satisfactory (Grade 3), 12 were identified as needing Improvement (Grade 2), and one was considered poor (Grade 1). Additionally, the study determined that 17 of the generated hypotheses had corresponding publications. Out of the three experimental plans assessed, one was rated excellent (5) for feasibility, while the others received good (4) and moderate (3) ratings. Predicted outcomes and alternative approaches were rated as good, with some areas requiring further improvement. Our data demonstrate that AI has the potential to revolutionize hypothesis generation in medical research, though further validation through experimental and clinical studies is needed. This study suggests that while AI can generate novel hypotheses, human expertise is essential for evaluating their practicality and relevance in scientific research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提出研究假设以克服结直肠癌早期诊断中的关键挑战——人工智能的未来应用。
我们打算探索ChatGPT 4.0在产生创新研究假设方面的能力,以解决结直肠癌(CRC)早期诊断中的关键挑战。我们要求ChatGPT针对三个主要挑战提出假设:提高筛选准确性、克服技术限制和识别可靠的生物标志物。对这些假设进行了新颖性评估。对ChatGPT提供的实验方案对所选假设进行完成性和可行性评估。结果,ChatGPT总共产生了65个假设。ChatGPT对所有65个假设进行了评级,其中25个假设获得最高评级(5分),40个假设获得4分或更低的评级。研究团队共对65个假设进行了评估,并将其分为以下等级:优秀(5级)、适宜(4级)16个、满意(3级)31个、需要改进(2级)12个、差(1级)1个。此外,研究确定了17个生成的假设有相应的出版物。在评估的三个实验计划中,一个被评为可行性优秀(5),而其他的则被评为良好(4)和中等(3)。预测结果和替代方法被评为良好,有些领域需要进一步改进。我们的数据表明,人工智能有可能彻底改变医学研究中的假设生成,尽管需要通过实验和临床研究进一步验证。这项研究表明,虽然人工智能可以产生新的假设,但人类的专业知识对于评估它们在科学研究中的实用性和相关性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer letters
Cancer letters 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
427
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Letters is a reputable international journal that serves as a platform for significant and original contributions in cancer research. The journal welcomes both full-length articles and Mini Reviews in the wide-ranging field of basic and translational oncology. Furthermore, it frequently presents Special Issues that shed light on current and topical areas in cancer research. Cancer Letters is highly interested in various fundamental aspects that can cater to a diverse readership. These areas include the molecular genetics and cell biology of cancer, radiation biology, molecular pathology, hormones and cancer, viral oncology, metastasis, and chemoprevention. The journal actively focuses on experimental therapeutics, particularly the advancement of targeted therapies for personalized cancer medicine, such as metronomic chemotherapy. By publishing groundbreaking research and promoting advancements in cancer treatments, Cancer Letters aims to actively contribute to the fight against cancer and the improvement of patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
DNA-PKcs promotes therapy resistance and metastatic recurrence in neuroblastoma cIAP1 inhibitor of apoptosis is a tumor suppressor in Ewing sarcoma ETV4 lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression by suppressing ferroptosis through TXNIP downregulation Multi-omics profiling reveals cholic acid-mediated immunosuppression driven by peritumoral ductular reactions in hepatocellular carcinoma Cancer-associated fibroblasts drive gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer by promoting ferroptosis resistance via the PAX6/PAK3/SLC3A2 axis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1