Exploring profiles of fathers integrating food and physical activity parenting practices.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Public Health Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1017/S1368980025000278
John A Jimenez-Garcia, Louise C Mâsse, Robert L Newton, Salma M Musaad, Alicia Beltran, Teresia M O'Connor
{"title":"Exploring profiles of fathers integrating food and physical activity parenting practices.","authors":"John A Jimenez-Garcia, Louise C Mâsse, Robert L Newton, Salma M Musaad, Alicia Beltran, Teresia M O'Connor","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify fathers' profiles integrating food parenting practices (FPP) and physical activity parenting practices (PAPP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We analysed cross-sectional data. The fathers completed the reduced FPP and PAPP item banks and socio-demographic and family dynamics (co-parenting and household responsibility) questionnaires. We identified fathers' profiles via latent profile analysis. We explored the influence of social determinants, child characteristics and family dynamics on fathers' profiles using multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey in the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fathers of 5-11-year-old children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed data from 606 fathers (age = 38 ± 8·0; Hispanic = 37·5 %). Most fathers self-identified as White (57·9 %) or Black/African American (17·7 %), overweight (41·1 %) or obese (34·8 %); attended college (70 %); earned > $47 000 (62·7 %); worked 40 hrs/week (63·4 %) and were biological fathers (90·1 %). Most children (boys = 55·5 %) were 5-8 years old (65·2 %). We identified five fathers' profiles combining FPP and PAPP: (1) <i>Engaged Supporter Father</i> (<i>n</i> 94 (15·5 %)); (2) <i>Leveled Father</i> (<i>n</i> 160 (26·4 %)); (3) <i>Autonomy-Focused Father</i> (<i>n</i> 117 (19·3 %)); (4) <i>Uninvolved Father</i> (<i>n</i> 113 (18·6 %)) and (5) <i>Control-Focused Father</i> (<i>n</i> 122 (20·1 %)). We observed significant associations with race, ethnicity, child characteristics, co-parenting and household responsibility but not with education level, annual income or employment status. We observed significant pairwise differences between profiles in co-parenting and household responsibility, with the <i>Engaged Supporter Father</i> presenting higher scores in both measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding how fathers' FPP and PAPP interact can enhance assessments for a comprehensive understanding of fathers' influences on children's health. Recognising the characteristics and differences among fathers' profiles may enable tailored interventions, potentially improving children's health trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to identify fathers' profiles integrating food parenting practices (FPP) and physical activity parenting practices (PAPP).

Design: We analysed cross-sectional data. The fathers completed the reduced FPP and PAPP item banks and socio-demographic and family dynamics (co-parenting and household responsibility) questionnaires. We identified fathers' profiles via latent profile analysis. We explored the influence of social determinants, child characteristics and family dynamics on fathers' profiles using multinomial logistic regression.

Setting: Online survey in the USA.

Participants: Fathers of 5-11-year-old children.

Results: We analysed data from 606 fathers (age = 38 ± 8·0; Hispanic = 37·5 %). Most fathers self-identified as White (57·9 %) or Black/African American (17·7 %), overweight (41·1 %) or obese (34·8 %); attended college (70 %); earned > $47 000 (62·7 %); worked 40 hrs/week (63·4 %) and were biological fathers (90·1 %). Most children (boys = 55·5 %) were 5-8 years old (65·2 %). We identified five fathers' profiles combining FPP and PAPP: (1) Engaged Supporter Father (n 94 (15·5 %)); (2) Leveled Father (n 160 (26·4 %)); (3) Autonomy-Focused Father (n 117 (19·3 %)); (4) Uninvolved Father (n 113 (18·6 %)) and (5) Control-Focused Father (n 122 (20·1 %)). We observed significant associations with race, ethnicity, child characteristics, co-parenting and household responsibility but not with education level, annual income or employment status. We observed significant pairwise differences between profiles in co-parenting and household responsibility, with the Engaged Supporter Father presenting higher scores in both measures.

Conclusions: Understanding how fathers' FPP and PAPP interact can enhance assessments for a comprehensive understanding of fathers' influences on children's health. Recognising the characteristics and differences among fathers' profiles may enable tailored interventions, potentially improving children's health trajectories.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索父亲将饮食和体育活动结合起来的育儿实践。
目的:本研究旨在对父亲的食物教养方式(FPP)和身体活动教养方式(PAPP)进行整合。设计:我们分析了横断面数据。父亲们完成了减少的FPP和PAPP题库以及社会人口和家庭动态(共同抚养和家庭责任)问卷调查。我们通过潜在侧写分析来确定父亲的侧写。我们使用多项逻辑回归探讨了社会决定因素、儿童特征和家庭动态对父亲概况的影响。设置:美国在线调查。参与者:5-11岁孩子的父亲。结果:我们分析了606名父亲的资料(年龄=38±8.0;拉美裔= 37.5%)。大多数父亲自认为是白人(57.9%)或黑人(17.7%);超重(41.1%)或肥胖(34.8%);上过大学(70%);收入:47,000美元(62.7%);每周工作40小时(63.4%);并且是生父(90.1%)。大多数儿童(男孩占55.5%)为5-8岁(65.2%)。结合FPP和PAPP,我们确定了五种父亲的特征:1)敬业的支持者父亲(n=94 [15.5%]);2) Leveled父亲(n=160 [26.4%]);3)自主型父亲(n=117 [19.3%]);4)不参与父亲(n=113 [18.6%]);5)控制型父亲(n=122[20.1%])。我们观察到与种族、民族、儿童特征、共同抚养和家庭责任有显著关联,但与教育水平、年收入或就业状况无关。我们观察到在共同抚养子女和家庭责任方面存在显著的两两差异,敬业的支持者父亲在两项指标中都表现出更高的得分。结论:了解父亲的FPP和PAPP如何相互作用,可以加强评估,全面了解父亲对儿童健康的影响。认识到父亲履历的特点和差异,可能有助于采取有针对性的干预措施,从而有可能改善儿童的健康轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
期刊最新文献
What's on the Menu? A Review of School Meal Quality Across 29 Countries. Association between Dietary Self-Perception and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Young Adults Latinas. Characteristics of the retail food environment and acceptability of policies promoting healthier restaurant food environments: to what extent are these concepts associated? Dietary Knowledge and Perceptions in UK Pakistani/Bangladeshi Communities: A Survey on Low-Carbohydrate and Intermittent Fasting diets for Diabetes Prevention and Management. Purchases and prices of unprocessed or minimally processed foods according to food outlets and income in Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1