Demand for fish in Great Britain is driven by household income and taste.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Public Health Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1017/S1368980025000217
Shashika D Rathnayaka, Cesar Revoredo-Giha, Baukje de Roos
{"title":"Demand for fish in Great Britain is driven by household income and taste.","authors":"Shashika D Rathnayaka, Cesar Revoredo-Giha, Baukje de Roos","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fish is high in nutrients that provide a range of health benefits, but people in Great Britain only consume around half the amount that is recommended. This study analysed the demand for fish, for consumption at home, across different household groups in Great Britain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using a Rotterdam demand model, price and income elasticities were estimated for eleven fish groups across seven household groups. To investigate changes in fish demand, we decomposed growth in fish demand into income, relative price, and change in taste and seasonality.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The data used for our analysis was drawn from the Kantar Worldpanel dataset for Great Britain for the period from 2013 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>12,492 households in Great Britain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Families with children consistently allocated a lower share of their grocery spending on fish and prefer to purchase ready-to-use and convenient fish products, compared to households without children. Purchases of chilled fresh/smoked oily fish, canned oily fish, and frozen processed fish led spending across demographic groups, whilst purchases of canned oily fish showed minimal growth. The demand for most fish products across household groups was price inelastic, indicating that the percentage change in quantity of fish demanded increased or fell by less than the percentage change in price.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Income and taste were identified as significant determinants of demand changes across all household groups, while price only played a prominent role in demand changes for certain fish groups. Thus, increasing fish consumption, especially in lower-income groups, who do not usually consume much fish, may require a different intervention than simply making fish more affordable.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fish is high in nutrients that provide a range of health benefits, but people in Great Britain only consume around half the amount that is recommended. This study analysed the demand for fish, for consumption at home, across different household groups in Great Britain.

Design: Using a Rotterdam demand model, price and income elasticities were estimated for eleven fish groups across seven household groups. To investigate changes in fish demand, we decomposed growth in fish demand into income, relative price, and change in taste and seasonality.

Setting: The data used for our analysis was drawn from the Kantar Worldpanel dataset for Great Britain for the period from 2013 to 2021.

Participants: 12,492 households in Great Britain.

Results: Families with children consistently allocated a lower share of their grocery spending on fish and prefer to purchase ready-to-use and convenient fish products, compared to households without children. Purchases of chilled fresh/smoked oily fish, canned oily fish, and frozen processed fish led spending across demographic groups, whilst purchases of canned oily fish showed minimal growth. The demand for most fish products across household groups was price inelastic, indicating that the percentage change in quantity of fish demanded increased or fell by less than the percentage change in price.

Conclusions: Income and taste were identified as significant determinants of demand changes across all household groups, while price only played a prominent role in demand changes for certain fish groups. Thus, increasing fish consumption, especially in lower-income groups, who do not usually consume much fish, may require a different intervention than simply making fish more affordable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
期刊最新文献
Polyunsaturated fatty acids, fish intake and risk of disabling dementia in Japan: the JPHC Disabling Dementia Study. Healthcare Staff Perceptions of the Hospital Food Environment: A Narrative Systematic Review. Advertisements of ultra-processed products outside food outlets: Field evidence from Montevideo, Uruguay. Demand for fish in Great Britain is driven by household income and taste. Stunting and inequality in Sri Lanka compared to other Low- and middle-income South Asian countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1