Predictive neural processing of self-generated hand and tool actions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy individuals.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Translational Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1038/s41398-025-03306-6
Christina V Schmitter, Mareike Pazen, Lukas Uhlmann, Bianca M van Kemenade, Tilo Kircher, Benjamin Straube
{"title":"Predictive neural processing of self-generated hand and tool actions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy individuals.","authors":"Christina V Schmitter, Mareike Pazen, Lukas Uhlmann, Bianca M van Kemenade, Tilo Kircher, Benjamin Straube","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03306-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) have been linked to dysfunctions in the predictive neural suppression of sensory input elicited by one's own actions. Such motor predictions become particularly challenging during tool use and when feedback from multiple sensory modalities is present. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates and potential dysfunctions of action feedback processing in SSD during tool use actions and bimodal sensory feedback presentation. Patients with SSD (N<sub>Total</sub> = 42; schizophrenia N<sub>F20</sub> = 34; schizoaffective disorder N<sub>F25</sub> = 6; other N = 2) and healthy controls (HC, N = 27) performed active or passive hand movements with or without a tool and received unimodal (visual; a video of their hand movement) or bimodal (visual and auditory) feedback with various delays (0, 83, 167, 250, 333, 417 ms). Subjects reported whether they detected a delay. A subgroup (N<sub>SSD</sub> = 20; N<sub>HC</sub> = 20) participated in an identical fMRI experiment. Both groups reported fewer delays in active than passive conditions and exhibited neural suppression in all conditions in occipital and temporoparietal regions, cerebellum, and SMA. Group differences emerged in right cuneus, calcarine, and middle occipital gyrus, with reduced active-passive differences in patients during tool use actions and in bimodal trials during actions performed without a tool. These results demonstrate for the first time that, although patients and HC show similarities in neural suppression, higher-level visual processing areas fail to adequately distinguish between self- and externally generated sensory input in patients, particularly in complex action feedback scenarios involving bimodal action feedback and feedback elicited by tool use actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03306-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) have been linked to dysfunctions in the predictive neural suppression of sensory input elicited by one's own actions. Such motor predictions become particularly challenging during tool use and when feedback from multiple sensory modalities is present. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates and potential dysfunctions of action feedback processing in SSD during tool use actions and bimodal sensory feedback presentation. Patients with SSD (NTotal = 42; schizophrenia NF20 = 34; schizoaffective disorder NF25 = 6; other N = 2) and healthy controls (HC, N = 27) performed active or passive hand movements with or without a tool and received unimodal (visual; a video of their hand movement) or bimodal (visual and auditory) feedback with various delays (0, 83, 167, 250, 333, 417 ms). Subjects reported whether they detected a delay. A subgroup (NSSD = 20; NHC = 20) participated in an identical fMRI experiment. Both groups reported fewer delays in active than passive conditions and exhibited neural suppression in all conditions in occipital and temporoparietal regions, cerebellum, and SMA. Group differences emerged in right cuneus, calcarine, and middle occipital gyrus, with reduced active-passive differences in patients during tool use actions and in bimodal trials during actions performed without a tool. These results demonstrate for the first time that, although patients and HC show similarities in neural suppression, higher-level visual processing areas fail to adequately distinguish between self- and externally generated sensory input in patients, particularly in complex action feedback scenarios involving bimodal action feedback and feedback elicited by tool use actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)与预测神经抑制自身动作引起的感觉输入的功能障碍有关。在使用工具和存在多种感觉模式反馈时,这种运动预测尤其具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们研究了在工具使用动作和双模感觉反馈呈现期间,SSD 患者动作反馈处理的神经相关性和潜在功能障碍。SSD患者(NT total = 42;精神分裂症 NF20 = 34;精神分裂情感障碍 NF25 = 6;其他 N = 2)和健康对照组(HC,N = 27)在使用或不使用工具的情况下进行主动或被动的手部动作,并接受不同延迟(0、83、167、250、333、417 毫秒)的单模态(视觉;手部动作视频)或双模态(视觉和听觉)反馈。受试者报告他们是否发现了延迟。一个分组(NSSD = 20;NHC = 20)参加了相同的 fMRI 实验。两组受试者在主动条件下报告的延迟均少于被动条件下报告的延迟,并且在枕叶和颞顶区、小脑和 SMA 的所有条件下均表现出神经抑制。在右侧楔回、钙丘和枕中回出现了组间差异,在使用工具的动作和不使用工具的动作的双模试验中,患者的主动-被动差异减少。这些结果首次证明,虽然患者和 HC 在神经抑制方面表现出相似性,但患者的高级视觉处理区域无法充分区分自身和外部产生的感觉输入,尤其是在涉及双模动作反馈和工具使用动作引起的反馈的复杂动作反馈情景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Correlations of blood and brain NMR metabolomics with Alzheimer's disease mouse models. Chemogenetic induction of CA1 hyperexcitability triggers indistinguishable autistic traits in asymptomatic mice differing in Ambra1 expression and sex. Investigating the shared genetic architecture between schizophrenia and sex hormone traits. Over-integration of visual network in major depressive disorder and its association with gene expression profiles. Predictive neural processing of self-generated hand and tool actions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1