Christina V Schmitter, Mareike Pazen, Lukas Uhlmann, Bianca M van Kemenade, Tilo Kircher, Benjamin Straube
{"title":"Predictive neural processing of self-generated hand and tool actions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy individuals.","authors":"Christina V Schmitter, Mareike Pazen, Lukas Uhlmann, Bianca M van Kemenade, Tilo Kircher, Benjamin Straube","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03306-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) have been linked to dysfunctions in the predictive neural suppression of sensory input elicited by one's own actions. Such motor predictions become particularly challenging during tool use and when feedback from multiple sensory modalities is present. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates and potential dysfunctions of action feedback processing in SSD during tool use actions and bimodal sensory feedback presentation. Patients with SSD (N<sub>Total</sub> = 42; schizophrenia N<sub>F20</sub> = 34; schizoaffective disorder N<sub>F25</sub> = 6; other N = 2) and healthy controls (HC, N = 27) performed active or passive hand movements with or without a tool and received unimodal (visual; a video of their hand movement) or bimodal (visual and auditory) feedback with various delays (0, 83, 167, 250, 333, 417 ms). Subjects reported whether they detected a delay. A subgroup (N<sub>SSD</sub> = 20; N<sub>HC</sub> = 20) participated in an identical fMRI experiment. Both groups reported fewer delays in active than passive conditions and exhibited neural suppression in all conditions in occipital and temporoparietal regions, cerebellum, and SMA. Group differences emerged in right cuneus, calcarine, and middle occipital gyrus, with reduced active-passive differences in patients during tool use actions and in bimodal trials during actions performed without a tool. These results demonstrate for the first time that, although patients and HC show similarities in neural suppression, higher-level visual processing areas fail to adequately distinguish between self- and externally generated sensory input in patients, particularly in complex action feedback scenarios involving bimodal action feedback and feedback elicited by tool use actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03306-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) have been linked to dysfunctions in the predictive neural suppression of sensory input elicited by one's own actions. Such motor predictions become particularly challenging during tool use and when feedback from multiple sensory modalities is present. In this study, we investigated the neural correlates and potential dysfunctions of action feedback processing in SSD during tool use actions and bimodal sensory feedback presentation. Patients with SSD (NTotal = 42; schizophrenia NF20 = 34; schizoaffective disorder NF25 = 6; other N = 2) and healthy controls (HC, N = 27) performed active or passive hand movements with or without a tool and received unimodal (visual; a video of their hand movement) or bimodal (visual and auditory) feedback with various delays (0, 83, 167, 250, 333, 417 ms). Subjects reported whether they detected a delay. A subgroup (NSSD = 20; NHC = 20) participated in an identical fMRI experiment. Both groups reported fewer delays in active than passive conditions and exhibited neural suppression in all conditions in occipital and temporoparietal regions, cerebellum, and SMA. Group differences emerged in right cuneus, calcarine, and middle occipital gyrus, with reduced active-passive differences in patients during tool use actions and in bimodal trials during actions performed without a tool. These results demonstrate for the first time that, although patients and HC show similarities in neural suppression, higher-level visual processing areas fail to adequately distinguish between self- and externally generated sensory input in patients, particularly in complex action feedback scenarios involving bimodal action feedback and feedback elicited by tool use actions.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.