Patients' Experiences Participating Within an Interdisciplinary Primary Care Program for Low Back Pain.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241311752
Amédé Gogovor, Matthew Hunt, Richard Hovey, Sara Ahmed
{"title":"Patients' Experiences Participating Within an Interdisciplinary Primary Care Program for Low Back Pain.","authors":"Amédé Gogovor, Matthew Hunt, Richard Hovey, Sara Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/23743735241311752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A common recommendation to improve the management of low back pain (LBP) is the use of interdisciplinary teams. However, many challenges remain in establishing interdisciplinary care, particularly in community-based primary care settings. This study explored patients' experiences with interdisciplinary care for LBP using an applied phenomenological research approach. Semistructured open-ended interviews were conducted with fifteen adults enrolled in a 6-month interdisciplinary LBP program within an integrated care network. The analysis included detailed descriptions of participants' experiences and interpretations by the researchers of the main themes: (i) challenging start-\"It's intimidating,\" (ii) desire for flexibility-\"I didn't need as much,\" (iii) better collaboration-\"They are all together,\" (iv) grasping the pain issue-\"They helped,\" (v) care was responsive to needs and experience-\"Always centered on me, not general,\" (vi) meanings of recovery-\"I'm able to function.\" Participants viewed the interdisciplinary LBP program as the culmination of a long journey toward recovery. The findings identified as important to patients contribute to our understanding of how to optimize patient-centered care for individuals living with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241311752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241311752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A common recommendation to improve the management of low back pain (LBP) is the use of interdisciplinary teams. However, many challenges remain in establishing interdisciplinary care, particularly in community-based primary care settings. This study explored patients' experiences with interdisciplinary care for LBP using an applied phenomenological research approach. Semistructured open-ended interviews were conducted with fifteen adults enrolled in a 6-month interdisciplinary LBP program within an integrated care network. The analysis included detailed descriptions of participants' experiences and interpretations by the researchers of the main themes: (i) challenging start-"It's intimidating," (ii) desire for flexibility-"I didn't need as much," (iii) better collaboration-"They are all together," (iv) grasping the pain issue-"They helped," (v) care was responsive to needs and experience-"Always centered on me, not general," (vi) meanings of recovery-"I'm able to function." Participants viewed the interdisciplinary LBP program as the culmination of a long journey toward recovery. The findings identified as important to patients contribute to our understanding of how to optimize patient-centered care for individuals living with chronic pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者参与跨学科初级保健项目治疗腰痛的经验。
一个常见的建议,以改善管理的腰痛(LBP)是使用跨学科团队。然而,在建立跨学科护理方面仍然存在许多挑战,特别是在以社区为基础的初级保健环境中。本研究以应用现象学研究方法探讨腰痛病患的跨学科照护经验。在一个综合护理网络中,对15名参加了为期6个月的跨学科LBP项目的成年人进行了半结构化开放式访谈。分析包括参与者经历的详细描述和研究人员对主要主题的解释:(i)具有挑战性的开始-“这是令人生畏的”;(ii)对灵活性的渴望-“我不需要那么多”;(iii)更好的合作-“他们都在一起”;(iv)掌握疼痛问题-“他们帮助”;(v)护理是对需求和经验的回应-“总是以我为中心,而不是一般”;(vi)康复的意义-“我能够发挥作用。”参与者将跨学科的LBP项目视为漫长的康复之旅的高潮。这些发现对患者很重要,有助于我们理解如何优化以患者为中心的慢性疼痛患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Visual Hallucinations and Illusions as Missed Diagnostic Clues in Autoimmune Disease: A Patient Perspective. Designing Nutrition Studies for Long COVID and Related Infection-Associated Chronic Illness: Qualitative Insights From a Patient-Reported Evaluation of Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy. Exploring Patient Heterogeneity in Service Quality Gaps and Satisfaction: Insights from Outpatient Care. Using a Quality Improvement Priority Metric to Promote Uniformly High-Quality Care: An Illustrative Example Using Child HCAHPS Survey Data. Lived Experiences of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Kidney Failure: Insights From a Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1