Distinct binding modes drive the broad neutralization profile of two persistent influenza hemagglutinin stem-specific antibody lineages

IF 4.4 2区生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Structure Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.str.2025.02.010

Grace E. Mantus, Gabriele Cerutti, Michael Chambers, Rebecca A. Gillespie, Geoffrey D. Shimberg, Abby Spangler, Jason Gorman, Tongqing Zhou, Chen-Hsiang Shen, Masaru Kanekiyo, Peter D. Kwong, Lawrence Shapiro, Sarah F. Andrews

{"title":"Distinct binding modes drive the broad neutralization profile of two persistent influenza hemagglutinin stem-specific antibody lineages","authors":"Grace E. Mantus, Gabriele Cerutti, Michael Chambers, Rebecca A. Gillespie, Geoffrey D. Shimberg, Abby Spangler, Jason Gorman, Tongqing Zhou, Chen-Hsiang Shen, Masaru Kanekiyo, Peter D. Kwong, Lawrence Shapiro, Sarah F. Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.str.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elicitation of antibodies to the influenza hemagglutinin stem is a critical part of universal influenza vaccine strategies. While numerous broadly reactive stem antibodies have been isolated, our understanding of how these antibodies mature within the human B cell repertoire is limited. Here, we isolated and tracked two stem-specific antibody lineages over a decade in a single participant that received multiple seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccinations. Despite similar binding and neutralization profiles, antibodies from these lineages utilized fundamentally different interactions to engage the central epitope on the influenza stem. Structural analysis of an unmutated common ancestor from one lineage identified critical residues that were the main drivers of increased affinity and breadth to group 1 influenza subtypes. These observations demonstrate the heterogeneous pathways by which stem-specific antibodies can mature within the human B cell repertoire.","PeriodicalId":22168,"journal":{"name":"Structure","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2025.02.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elicitation of antibodies to the influenza hemagglutinin stem is a critical part of universal influenza vaccine strategies. While numerous broadly reactive stem antibodies have been isolated, our understanding of how these antibodies mature within the human B cell repertoire is limited. Here, we isolated and tracked two stem-specific antibody lineages over a decade in a single participant that received multiple seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccinations. Despite similar binding and neutralization profiles, antibodies from these lineages utilized fundamentally different interactions to engage the central epitope on the influenza stem. Structural analysis of an unmutated common ancestor from one lineage identified critical residues that were the main drivers of increased affinity and breadth to group 1 influenza subtypes. These observations demonstrate the heterogeneous pathways by which stem-specific antibodies can mature within the human B cell repertoire.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Structure 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

8.90

自引率

1.80%

发文量

155

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Structure aims to publish papers of exceptional interest in the field of structural biology. The journal strives to be essential reading for structural biologists, as well as biologists and biochemists that are interested in macromolecular structure and function. Structure strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that present structural and molecular insights into biological function and mechanism. Other reports that address fundamental questions in structural biology, such as structure-based examinations of protein evolution, folding, and/or design, will also be considered. We will consider the application of any method, experimental or computational, at high or low resolution, to conduct structural investigations, as long as the method is appropriate for the biological, functional, and mechanistic question(s) being addressed. Likewise, reports describing single-molecule analysis of biological mechanisms are welcome. In general, the editors encourage submission of experimental structural studies that are enriched by an analysis of structure-activity relationships and will not consider studies that solely report structural information unless the structure or analysis is of exceptional and broad interest. Studies reporting only homology models, de novo models, or molecular dynamics simulations are also discouraged unless the models are informed by or validated by novel experimental data; rationalization of a large body of existing experimental evidence and making testable predictions based on a model or simulation is often not considered sufficient.