Parsimonious machine learning for the global mapping of aboveground biomass potential

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07587
Diego Bengochea Paz, Alba Marquez-Torres, João Pompeu, Olivier Martin-Ducup, Ferdinando Villa, Carmen Köhler, Stefano Balbi
{"title":"Parsimonious machine learning for the global mapping of aboveground biomass potential","authors":"Diego Bengochea Paz, Alba Marquez-Torres, João Pompeu, Olivier Martin-Ducup, Ferdinando Villa, Carmen Köhler, Stefano Balbi","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in computational power and methods, and the widespread availability of remote sensing data have driven the development of machine learning models for estimating global carbon storage. Current models often rely on dozens of predictor variables to estimate aboveground biomass density (AGBD), resulting in accurate but complex models that are challenging to interpret from a biological and ecological standpoint. Yet, it remains unclear whether such model complexity is essential to achieving accurate predictions. This manuscript investigates the potential to create a simpler, yet accurate, global AGBD model. Our approach leverages only climate-based predictors, using a systematic predictor selection process to determine the optimal subset of variables that maximize model accuracy. Surprisingly, we found that a minimal model trained with only four bioclimatic variables outperformed more complex models. When compared to a state-of-the-art complex model and ground-based data, our model achieved comparable accuracy using only four predictors, far fewer than the 186 predictors used in the complex model. In conclusion, we present a lightweight, interpretable climate-based model for AGBD estimation, with the additional advantage of being adaptable for projecting AGBD under future climate scenarios.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in computational power and methods, and the widespread availability of remote sensing data have driven the development of machine learning models for estimating global carbon storage. Current models often rely on dozens of predictor variables to estimate aboveground biomass density (AGBD), resulting in accurate but complex models that are challenging to interpret from a biological and ecological standpoint. Yet, it remains unclear whether such model complexity is essential to achieving accurate predictions. This manuscript investigates the potential to create a simpler, yet accurate, global AGBD model. Our approach leverages only climate-based predictors, using a systematic predictor selection process to determine the optimal subset of variables that maximize model accuracy. Surprisingly, we found that a minimal model trained with only four bioclimatic variables outperformed more complex models. When compared to a state-of-the-art complex model and ground-based data, our model achieved comparable accuracy using only four predictors, far fewer than the 186 predictors used in the complex model. In conclusion, we present a lightweight, interpretable climate-based model for AGBD estimation, with the additional advantage of being adaptable for projecting AGBD under future climate scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Richness patterns in vertebrates are robust to the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls Regional databases demonstrate macroecological patterns less clearly than systematically collected field data Genetic structure and diversity of the declining orchid Gymnadenia conopsea in Scandinavia: implications for conservation and management Parsimonious machine learning for the global mapping of aboveground biomass potential Drier, more seasonal climates strengthen coordination of hydraulic, leaf economic and reproductive strategies in subtropical forest tree communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1