Diego Bengochea Paz, Alba Marquez-Torres, João Pompeu, Olivier Martin-Ducup, Ferdinando Villa, Carmen Köhler, Stefano Balbi
{"title":"Parsimonious machine learning for the global mapping of aboveground biomass potential","authors":"Diego Bengochea Paz, Alba Marquez-Torres, João Pompeu, Olivier Martin-Ducup, Ferdinando Villa, Carmen Köhler, Stefano Balbi","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in computational power and methods, and the widespread availability of remote sensing data have driven the development of machine learning models for estimating global carbon storage. Current models often rely on dozens of predictor variables to estimate aboveground biomass density (AGBD), resulting in accurate but complex models that are challenging to interpret from a biological and ecological standpoint. Yet, it remains unclear whether such model complexity is essential to achieving accurate predictions. This manuscript investigates the potential to create a simpler, yet accurate, global AGBD model. Our approach leverages only climate-based predictors, using a systematic predictor selection process to determine the optimal subset of variables that maximize model accuracy. Surprisingly, we found that a minimal model trained with only four bioclimatic variables outperformed more complex models. When compared to a state-of-the-art complex model and ground-based data, our model achieved comparable accuracy using only four predictors, far fewer than the 186 predictors used in the complex model. In conclusion, we present a lightweight, interpretable climate-based model for AGBD estimation, with the additional advantage of being adaptable for projecting AGBD under future climate scenarios.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advances in computational power and methods, and the widespread availability of remote sensing data have driven the development of machine learning models for estimating global carbon storage. Current models often rely on dozens of predictor variables to estimate aboveground biomass density (AGBD), resulting in accurate but complex models that are challenging to interpret from a biological and ecological standpoint. Yet, it remains unclear whether such model complexity is essential to achieving accurate predictions. This manuscript investigates the potential to create a simpler, yet accurate, global AGBD model. Our approach leverages only climate-based predictors, using a systematic predictor selection process to determine the optimal subset of variables that maximize model accuracy. Surprisingly, we found that a minimal model trained with only four bioclimatic variables outperformed more complex models. When compared to a state-of-the-art complex model and ground-based data, our model achieved comparable accuracy using only four predictors, far fewer than the 186 predictors used in the complex model. In conclusion, we present a lightweight, interpretable climate-based model for AGBD estimation, with the additional advantage of being adaptable for projecting AGBD under future climate scenarios.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.