{"title":"Predicting Risk of Malignant CNS Tumors From Medical History Events.","authors":"Aaron J Hill","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.
Methods: Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.
期刊介绍:
Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it:
-Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes;
-Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes;
-Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making;
-Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes;
-Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.