Predicting Risk of Malignant CNS Tumors From Medical History Events.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality Management in Health Care Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497
Aaron J Hill
{"title":"Predicting Risk of Malignant CNS Tumors From Medical History Events.","authors":"Aaron J Hill","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors (MBT) are the second leading cause of cancer death among males aged 39 years and younger, and the leading cause of cancer death among males and females younger than 20. There are few widely accepted predictors and a lack of United States Preventive Services Taskforce recommendations for MBT. This study examined how medical history could be used to assess the risk of MBT.

Methods: Using over 400,000 patients' medical histories, including nearly 1,800 with MBT, Logistic Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to predict MBT. More than 25,000 diagnoses were grouped into 16 body systems, plus pairwise and triple combinations, as well as indicators for missing values. Data were split into 80/20 training and validation sets with fit and accuracy assessed using McFadden's R2 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: Diagnoses of the endocrine, nervous, and lymphatic systems consistently showed greater than three times more association with MBT. The best performing model at an AUC of 0.83 consisted of 14 body system diagnosis groups and pairwise interactions among groups, in addition to demographic, social determinant of health, death, and six missing diagnosis grouping indicators.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated how large data models can predict MBT in patients using EHR data. With the lack of preventive screening guidelines and known risk factors associated with MBT, predictive models provide a universal, non-invasive, and inexpensive method of identifying at-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
期刊最新文献
Predicting Risk of Malignant CNS Tumors From Medical History Events. The Coming Home Intervention to Enhance Safe Hospital-to-Home Health Transitions: Pilot Evaluation. Cost-Related Barriers to Medication Adherence in Uveitis Patients Enrolled in NIH's All of Us Program. The Potential of Patient Stories to Advance Birth Equity. Peer Audit and Feedback: A Documentation-Focused Quality Improvement Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1