Alicia I Arbaje, Yea-Jen Hsu, Sylvan Greyson, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sasha Vergez, Katie Harbison, Nicole Williams, Dawn Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Ayse P Gurses, Jill A Marsteller, Bruce Leff
{"title":"The Coming Home Intervention to Enhance Safe Hospital-to-Home Health Transitions: Pilot Evaluation.","authors":"Alicia I Arbaje, Yea-Jen Hsu, Sylvan Greyson, Kathryn H Bowles, Margaret V McDonald, Sasha Vergez, Katie Harbison, Nicole Williams, Dawn Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Ayse P Gurses, Jill A Marsteller, Bruce Leff","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care transitions from hospital to skilled home health care (HH) often pose safety risks, especially for older adults. The Coming Home Intervention (CHI) was developed to enhance these transitions based on the Hospital-to-Home Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) index, a previously validated survey instrument assessing quality issues during hospital-to-HH transitions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to pilot CHI and evaluate its impact at 2 large HH agencies in Baltimore, MD, and New York, NY.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2 participating HH agencies implement CHI by providing HH clinicians and patients tools for expectation setting, clarification of healthcare-related roles of family and HH personnel, clinical care guides to support information management, and the H3TQ for identification of quality/safety issues. Using a quasi-experimental, before-and-after difference-in-difference design, changes before and after CHI implementation were compared between intervention and comparison groups. Quality of hospital-to-HH transitions was rated by older adults/caregivers and HH clinicians using the H3TQ before and after CHI implementation. In total, 394 responses were from older adults/caregivers and 604 responses were from HH clinicians. Outcomes including identification of medication issues and 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization were evaluated using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set with a difference-in-difference approach (n = 3,471 in the Baltimore site; n = 758 in the New York City site). Results were analyzed and reported separately for each HH agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHI implementation in Baltimore was associated with a statistically non-significant, decreasing trend in 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-1.03). After implementation, older adults/caregivers rated quality issues measured by H3TQ less favorably. In New York City, older adults/caregivers reported fewer quality issues (incidence rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.89) after implementation. Assessment of other measures did not show significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pilot implementation of CHI demonstrated potential to improve hospital-to-HH transition quality. Study findings can guide future CHI implementation in larger studies in a broader population of older adults receiving HH services after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Care transitions from hospital to skilled home health care (HH) often pose safety risks, especially for older adults. The Coming Home Intervention (CHI) was developed to enhance these transitions based on the Hospital-to-Home Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) index, a previously validated survey instrument assessing quality issues during hospital-to-HH transitions.
Objectives: This study aimed to pilot CHI and evaluate its impact at 2 large HH agencies in Baltimore, MD, and New York, NY.
Methods: The 2 participating HH agencies implement CHI by providing HH clinicians and patients tools for expectation setting, clarification of healthcare-related roles of family and HH personnel, clinical care guides to support information management, and the H3TQ for identification of quality/safety issues. Using a quasi-experimental, before-and-after difference-in-difference design, changes before and after CHI implementation were compared between intervention and comparison groups. Quality of hospital-to-HH transitions was rated by older adults/caregivers and HH clinicians using the H3TQ before and after CHI implementation. In total, 394 responses were from older adults/caregivers and 604 responses were from HH clinicians. Outcomes including identification of medication issues and 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization were evaluated using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set with a difference-in-difference approach (n = 3,471 in the Baltimore site; n = 758 in the New York City site). Results were analyzed and reported separately for each HH agency.
Results: CHI implementation in Baltimore was associated with a statistically non-significant, decreasing trend in 30-day emergency department use or rehospitalization (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-1.03). After implementation, older adults/caregivers rated quality issues measured by H3TQ less favorably. In New York City, older adults/caregivers reported fewer quality issues (incidence rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.89) after implementation. Assessment of other measures did not show significant changes.
Conclusion: The pilot implementation of CHI demonstrated potential to improve hospital-to-HH transition quality. Study findings can guide future CHI implementation in larger studies in a broader population of older adults receiving HH services after hospital discharge.
期刊介绍:
Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it:
-Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes;
-Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes;
-Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making;
-Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes;
-Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.