Feedback From Dental Students Using Two Alternate Coaching Methods: Qualitative Focus Group Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES JMIR Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.2196/68309
Lulwah Alreshaid, Rana Alkattan
{"title":"Feedback From Dental Students Using Two Alternate Coaching Methods: Qualitative Focus Group Study.","authors":"Lulwah Alreshaid, Rana Alkattan","doi":"10.2196/68309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Student feedback is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of institutions. However, implementing feedback can be challenging due to practical difficulties. While student feedback on courses can improve teaching, there is a debate about its effectiveness if not well-written to provide helpful information to the receiver.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of coaching on proper feedback given by dental students in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 47 first-year dental students from a public dental school in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, completed 3 surveys throughout the academic year. The surveys assessed their feedback on a Dental Anatomy and Operative Dentistry course, including their feedback on the lectures, practical sessions, examinations, and overall experience. The surveys focused on assessing student feedback on the knowledge, understanding, and practical skills achieved during the course, as aligned with the defined course learning outcomes. The surveys were distributed without coaching, after handout coaching and after workshop coaching on how to provide feedback, designated as survey #1, survey #2, and survey #3, respectively. The same group of students received all 3 surveys consecutively (repeated measures design). The responses were then rated as neutral, positive, negative, or constructive by 2 raters. The feedback was analyzed using McNemar test to compare the effectiveness of the different coaching approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While no significant changes were found between the first 2 surveys, a significant increase in constructive feedback was observed in survey #3 after workshop coaching compared with both other surveys (P<.001). The results also showed a higher proportion of desired changes in feedback, defined as any change from positive, negative, or neutral to constructive, after survey #3 (P<.001). Overall, 20.2% reported desired changes at survey #2% and 41.5% at survey #3 compared with survey #1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that workshops on feedback coaching can effectively improve the quality of feedback provided by dental students. Incorporating feedback coaching into dental school curricula could help students communicate their concerns more effectively, ultimately enhancing the learning experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e68309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Student feedback is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of institutions. However, implementing feedback can be challenging due to practical difficulties. While student feedback on courses can improve teaching, there is a debate about its effectiveness if not well-written to provide helpful information to the receiver.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of coaching on proper feedback given by dental students in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A total of 47 first-year dental students from a public dental school in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, completed 3 surveys throughout the academic year. The surveys assessed their feedback on a Dental Anatomy and Operative Dentistry course, including their feedback on the lectures, practical sessions, examinations, and overall experience. The surveys focused on assessing student feedback on the knowledge, understanding, and practical skills achieved during the course, as aligned with the defined course learning outcomes. The surveys were distributed without coaching, after handout coaching and after workshop coaching on how to provide feedback, designated as survey #1, survey #2, and survey #3, respectively. The same group of students received all 3 surveys consecutively (repeated measures design). The responses were then rated as neutral, positive, negative, or constructive by 2 raters. The feedback was analyzed using McNemar test to compare the effectiveness of the different coaching approaches.

Results: While no significant changes were found between the first 2 surveys, a significant increase in constructive feedback was observed in survey #3 after workshop coaching compared with both other surveys (P<.001). The results also showed a higher proportion of desired changes in feedback, defined as any change from positive, negative, or neutral to constructive, after survey #3 (P<.001). Overall, 20.2% reported desired changes at survey #2% and 41.5% at survey #3 compared with survey #1.

Conclusions: This study suggests that workshops on feedback coaching can effectively improve the quality of feedback provided by dental students. Incorporating feedback coaching into dental school curricula could help students communicate their concerns more effectively, ultimately enhancing the learning experience.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科学生使用两种替代辅导方法的反馈:定性焦点小组研究。
背景:学生的反馈对评估机构的有效性至关重要。然而,由于实际困难,实现反馈可能具有挑战性。虽然学生对课程的反馈可以改善教学,但如果写得不好,无法为接受者提供有用的信息,那么对其有效性存在争议。目的:本研究旨在评估指导对沙特阿拉伯牙科学生适当反馈的影响。方法:选取沙特阿拉伯利雅得一所公立牙科学校的47名一年级牙科学生,在整个学年完成3次调查。调查评估了他们对牙科解剖学和牙科手术课程的反馈,包括他们对讲座、实践课程、考试和整体体验的反馈。调查的重点是评估学生在课程中获得的知识、理解和实践技能的反馈,并与所定义的课程学习成果保持一致。调查是在没有指导的情况下,在讲义指导和如何提供反馈的研讨会指导之后分发的,分别指定为调查#1,调查#2和调查#3。同一组学生连续接受所有3项调查(重复测量设计)。然后由两名评分员将这些回答分为中性、积极、消极或建设性。采用McNemar测试对反馈进行分析,比较不同教练方式的有效性。结果:虽然前两次调查结果无明显变化,但第三次调查的建设性反馈与前两次调查相比有显著增加(p结论:本研究表明,反馈辅导研讨会可以有效提高牙科学生的反馈质量。将反馈指导纳入牙科学校的课程可以帮助学生更有效地交流他们的担忧,最终提高学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preparing Physicians for Tomorrow's Practice: Contemporary Practice Competencies as a Framework for Technology-Driven Change. Health and Humanities and Social Sciences Professionals' Perceptions Regarding the Teaching of the Effects of Racism in Medicine: Semistructured Interview Study. Virtual Reality-Enhanced Training for Trauma-Informed Care Among Residential and Child Mental Health Professionals: Pre-Post Evaluation Study. Instagram Video Engagement in Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Study. Developing and Validating a Coding Scheme for Clinical Reasoning in History Taking Using Generative AI-Based Virtual Patients: Systematic Text Condensation Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1