{"title":"Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast MRI Correlates with Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.","authors":"Hongyu Liu, Xinyue Chen, Yanna Wang, Xiaoping Yang, Yuxingzi Chen","doi":"10.2174/0115734056347327250117073638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>MRI could be considered as a non-destructive disease diagnosis procedure, this procedure does not allow directly molecular types of cancer. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation of breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) with the molecular subtypes and immunohistochemical markers of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-cross-sectional retrospective study.Fifty-six patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast MRI scans before needle biopsy or surgery were selected. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative BPE/FGT ratios and the expression of breast cancer molecular subtypes and immunohistochemical markers were evaluated in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative BPE (BPE%) of luminal A and luminal B was significantly lower than that of triple-negative breast cancer. There was no significant difference in the qualitative BPE/FGT between the different breast cancer subtypes. The quantitative BPE (BPE%) of estrogen receptor (ER)- negative tumors was higher than that of the ER-positive tumors, and the expression of FGT%, BPE%, and other immunohistochemical markers (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER-2), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67) were not significantly different. The proportion of high BPE distribution in HER-2 positive tumors was higher than that in the HER-2 negative group; however, there was no significant difference in the expression of qualitative BPE/FGT and other immunohistochemical markers (ER, PR, and Ki-67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were significant differences in the levels of BPE among the different molecular subtypes. Therefore, BPE may be a potential imaging biomarker for the diagnosis of the molecular subtypes of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056347327250117073638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: MRI could be considered as a non-destructive disease diagnosis procedure, this procedure does not allow directly molecular types of cancer. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation of breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) with the molecular subtypes and immunohistochemical markers of breast cancer.
Methods: This was a single-cross-sectional retrospective study.Fifty-six patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast MRI scans before needle biopsy or surgery were selected. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative BPE/FGT ratios and the expression of breast cancer molecular subtypes and immunohistochemical markers were evaluated in patients with breast cancer.
Results: Quantitative BPE (BPE%) of luminal A and luminal B was significantly lower than that of triple-negative breast cancer. There was no significant difference in the qualitative BPE/FGT between the different breast cancer subtypes. The quantitative BPE (BPE%) of estrogen receptor (ER)- negative tumors was higher than that of the ER-positive tumors, and the expression of FGT%, BPE%, and other immunohistochemical markers (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER-2), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67) were not significantly different. The proportion of high BPE distribution in HER-2 positive tumors was higher than that in the HER-2 negative group; however, there was no significant difference in the expression of qualitative BPE/FGT and other immunohistochemical markers (ER, PR, and Ki-67).
Conclusion: There were significant differences in the levels of BPE among the different molecular subtypes. Therefore, BPE may be a potential imaging biomarker for the diagnosis of the molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.