Emerging protein sequencing technologies: proteomics without Mass spectrometry?

IF 3.8 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Expert Review of Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1080/14789450.2025.2476979
A S Deshpande, A Lin, I O'Bryon, J A Aufrecht, E D Merkley
{"title":"Emerging protein sequencing technologies: proteomics without Mass spectrometry?","authors":"A S Deshpande, A Lin, I O'Bryon, J A Aufrecht, E D Merkley","doi":"10.1080/14789450.2025.2476979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been a leading method for proteomics for thirty years. Advantages provided by LC-MS/MS are offset by significant disadvantages, including cost. Recently, several non-mass spectrometric methods have emerged, but little information is available about their capacity to analyze the complex mixtures routine for mass spectrometry.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We review recent non-mass-spectrometric methods for sequencing proteins and peptides, including using nanopores, sequencing by degradation, reverse translation, and short-epitope mapping, with comments on bioinformatics challenges, fundamental limitations, and areas where new technologies will be more or less competitive with LC-MS/MS. In addition to conventional literature searches, instrument vendor websites, patents, webinars, and preprints were also consulted to give a more up-to-date picture.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Many new technologies are promising. However, demonstrations that they outperform mass spectrometry in terms of peptides and proteins identified have not yet been published, and astute observers note important disadvantages, especially relating to the dynamic range of single-molecule measurements of complex mixtures. Still, even if the performance of emerging methods proves inferior to LC-MS/MS, their low cost could create a different kind of revolution: a dramatic increase in the number of biology laboratories engaging in new forms of proteomics research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50463,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Proteomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2025.2476979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been a leading method for proteomics for thirty years. Advantages provided by LC-MS/MS are offset by significant disadvantages, including cost. Recently, several non-mass spectrometric methods have emerged, but little information is available about their capacity to analyze the complex mixtures routine for mass spectrometry.

Areas covered: We review recent non-mass-spectrometric methods for sequencing proteins and peptides, including using nanopores, sequencing by degradation, reverse translation, and short-epitope mapping, with comments on bioinformatics challenges, fundamental limitations, and areas where new technologies will be more or less competitive with LC-MS/MS. In addition to conventional literature searches, instrument vendor websites, patents, webinars, and preprints were also consulted to give a more up-to-date picture.

Expert opinion: Many new technologies are promising. However, demonstrations that they outperform mass spectrometry in terms of peptides and proteins identified have not yet been published, and astute observers note important disadvantages, especially relating to the dynamic range of single-molecule measurements of complex mixtures. Still, even if the performance of emerging methods proves inferior to LC-MS/MS, their low cost could create a different kind of revolution: a dramatic increase in the number of biology laboratories engaging in new forms of proteomics research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Proteomics
Expert Review of Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Proteomics (ISSN 1478-9450) seeks to collect together technologies, methods and discoveries from the field of proteomics to advance scientific understanding of the many varied roles protein expression plays in human health and disease. The journal coverage includes, but is not limited to, overviews of specific technological advances in the development of protein arrays, interaction maps, data archives and biological assays, performance of new technologies and prospects for future drug discovery. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies and a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Article highlights - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Emerging protein sequencing technologies: proteomics without Mass spectrometry? Novel activity assay for botulotoxin A1 detection using functionalized chips and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Proteomic interrogation of the human olfactory system: the road ahead. Mass spectrometry-based ligand binding assays in biomedical research. Omics and rare diseases: challenges, applications, and future perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1