Protein supplementation optimizes muscle strength and hypertrophic responses induced by low-load training with blood flow restriction in resistance-trained individuals.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition ESPEN Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.018
Levi da Silva Vendruscolo, Helderson Brendon, Victoria Hévia Larrain, André Yui Aihara, Vitor de Salles Painelli
{"title":"Protein supplementation optimizes muscle strength and hypertrophic responses induced by low-load training with blood flow restriction in resistance-trained individuals.","authors":"Levi da Silva Vendruscolo, Helderson Brendon, Victoria Hévia Larrain, André Yui Aihara, Vitor de Salles Painelli","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training induces favorable changes in muscle hypertrophy and strength. However, the potential additive effect of LL-BFR and protein supplementation on these outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four recreationally resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to either a protein (PRO) or placebo (PLA) supplementation group in a 2:1 ratio. After being submitted to maximum dynamic strength (1-RM) and elbow flexors muscles cross-sectional area (EFCSA) assessments at baseline, participants were enrolled in a 3-week unilateral LL-BFR training (4 days per week, 4 sets of 15 repetitions, 30% 1-RM) for the elbow flexors muscles in the incline dumbbell curl exercise. Psychological outcomes (rate of perceived exertion, pain and muscle soreness) were obtained at the first and last training session. EFCSA and 1-RM were reassessed after LL-BFR, with EFCSA being assessed at 45%, 65% and 85% of humerus length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological responses to LL-BFR improved in PRO and PLA (both p<0.05), with no significant between-group differences (all comparisons, p>0.05). A significant improvement in 1-RM was detected for PRO (+7.2%, p=0.0002), but not PLA (+3.5%, p=0.156). PRO experienced significant increases in EFCSA at 45% (+7.5%, p=0.021), 65% (+5.2%, p=0.033) and 85% lengths (+8.4%, p=0.002), while PLA experienced increases only at the 85% length (+5.9%, p=0.045). Absolute increases in 1-RM were greater for PRO vs. PLA (p=0.039), whereas increases in EFCSA tended to be greater for PRO vs. PLA at 45% (p=0.086) and 65% lengths (p=0.072).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that protein supplementation optimized the LL-BFR-induced muscle strength and hypertrophy improvements in trained individuals under comparable psychological responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training induces favorable changes in muscle hypertrophy and strength. However, the potential additive effect of LL-BFR and protein supplementation on these outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: Twenty-four recreationally resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to either a protein (PRO) or placebo (PLA) supplementation group in a 2:1 ratio. After being submitted to maximum dynamic strength (1-RM) and elbow flexors muscles cross-sectional area (EFCSA) assessments at baseline, participants were enrolled in a 3-week unilateral LL-BFR training (4 days per week, 4 sets of 15 repetitions, 30% 1-RM) for the elbow flexors muscles in the incline dumbbell curl exercise. Psychological outcomes (rate of perceived exertion, pain and muscle soreness) were obtained at the first and last training session. EFCSA and 1-RM were reassessed after LL-BFR, with EFCSA being assessed at 45%, 65% and 85% of humerus length.

Results: Psychological responses to LL-BFR improved in PRO and PLA (both p<0.05), with no significant between-group differences (all comparisons, p>0.05). A significant improvement in 1-RM was detected for PRO (+7.2%, p=0.0002), but not PLA (+3.5%, p=0.156). PRO experienced significant increases in EFCSA at 45% (+7.5%, p=0.021), 65% (+5.2%, p=0.033) and 85% lengths (+8.4%, p=0.002), while PLA experienced increases only at the 85% length (+5.9%, p=0.045). Absolute increases in 1-RM were greater for PRO vs. PLA (p=0.039), whereas increases in EFCSA tended to be greater for PRO vs. PLA at 45% (p=0.086) and 65% lengths (p=0.072).

Conclusion: Our results showed that protein supplementation optimized the LL-BFR-induced muscle strength and hypertrophy improvements in trained individuals under comparable psychological responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection. Exploring Beyond Numeric Weight Loss: The Metabolic Effects of Semaglutide. Protein supplementation optimizes muscle strength and hypertrophic responses induced by low-load training with blood flow restriction in resistance-trained individuals. Low-carbohydrate diet in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Handgrip strength during pregnancy: a first reference values based on nationally representative survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1