Inadequate consumption of dietary fatty acids is a risk factor for ovarian cancer: evidence from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS European Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s00394-025-03650-9
Jiahui Lao, Yifan Wei, Fanghua Liu, Tingting Gong, Qijun Wu
{"title":"Inadequate consumption of dietary fatty acids is a risk factor for ovarian cancer: evidence from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.","authors":"Jiahui Lao, Yifan Wei, Fanghua Liu, Tingting Gong, Qijun Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00394-025-03650-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Currently, there is controversy surrounding the association between dietary fatty acids (FAs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. We aimed to elucidate the aforementioned topic using data from a large cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women participating in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial were included in this study. The dietary information of participants was collected through the diet history questionnaire. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models incorporating restricted cubic splines were constructed to explore the association between dietary FAs intake and the incidence of OC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 50,614 participants in the present study, a total of 277 cases of ovarian cancer were diagnosed. The median follow-up time was 9.44 years. Non-significant association between total FAs intake and risk of OC was observed (non-linear P = 0.060). Compared to the median of total FAs intake, hazard ratios were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.10-2.58) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.05-1.99) for the 5th percentile and 10th percentile, respectively, while consuming more than the median failed to show significant findings. Similar results were found in the analyses of different types (saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids) and sources (animals and plants) of dietary FAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inadequate consumption of various types and sources of dietary FAs might be associated with an increased risk of OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 3","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03650-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Currently, there is controversy surrounding the association between dietary fatty acids (FAs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. We aimed to elucidate the aforementioned topic using data from a large cohort.

Methods: Women participating in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial were included in this study. The dietary information of participants was collected through the diet history questionnaire. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models incorporating restricted cubic splines were constructed to explore the association between dietary FAs intake and the incidence of OC.

Results: Among 50,614 participants in the present study, a total of 277 cases of ovarian cancer were diagnosed. The median follow-up time was 9.44 years. Non-significant association between total FAs intake and risk of OC was observed (non-linear P = 0.060). Compared to the median of total FAs intake, hazard ratios were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.10-2.58) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.05-1.99) for the 5th percentile and 10th percentile, respectively, while consuming more than the median failed to show significant findings. Similar results were found in the analyses of different types (saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids) and sources (animals and plants) of dietary FAs.

Conclusion: Inadequate consumption of various types and sources of dietary FAs might be associated with an increased risk of OC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膳食脂肪酸摄入不足是卵巢癌的一个危险因素:来自前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验的证据。
目的:目前,关于膳食脂肪酸(FAs)与卵巢癌(OC)风险之间的关系存在争议。我们的目的是利用来自一个大型队列的数据来阐明上述主题。方法:参与前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验的妇女纳入本研究。通过饮食史问卷收集参与者的饮食信息。构建多变量Cox比例风险回归模型,探讨膳食脂肪酸摄入量与OC发病率之间的关系。结果:在本研究的50,614名参与者中,共诊断出277例卵巢癌。中位随访时间为9.44年。FAs总摄入量与OC风险之间无显著相关性(非线性P = 0.060)。与总FAs摄入量的中位数相比,第5百分位和第10百分位的风险比分别为1.68 (95% CI: 1.10-2.58)和1.45 (95% CI: 1.05-1.99),而摄入超过中位数的风险比没有显示出显著的结果。对不同类型(饱和脂肪酸、单不饱和脂肪酸和多不饱和脂肪酸)和膳食脂肪酸来源(动物和植物)的分析也发现了类似的结果。结论:摄入各种类型和来源的膳食脂肪酸不足可能与OC风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
期刊最新文献
From plate to pillow, and vice versa: diet-sleep dynamics in free-living adults with obesity. Replacing meat and dairy with plant-based alternatives in the Netherlands: trade-offs in environmental impacts and critical nutrient intake. Disparities in fatigue levels and dietary habits between men and women with inflammatory bowel disease: a comparative analysis with a control cohort. Magnesium supplements, sleep quality, and nocturnal leg cramps: a combination of cross-sectional and prospective studies. Immune modulation in response to coffee intake: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1