The resident physicians losing out after private firms took over their hospitals

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r506
Paige Huffman
{"title":"The resident physicians losing out after private firms took over their hospitals","authors":"Paige Huffman","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More and more US hospitals are being bought by private equity firms. Sudden closures and layoffs are having a devastating effect on resident doctors’ careers, reports Paige Huffman Liz Calhoun was halfway through her three year emergency physician training when she learnt from a text message that her hospital was closing in three months. She and the other 571 resident physicians at Hahnemann University Hospital in Philadelphia did not know how or where they would finish their training. In the end they didn’t have three months to figure it out: the training programme closed 30 days later. Hahnemann, located in the heart of the city, was a “safety net” hospital, meaning that its staff provided care to patients regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay. At the time of its closure in 2019, Hahnemann made headlines as the model for what can go wrong when a profit driven private equity firm takes over a hospital. In the years since, several other hospitals bought by private equity firms have abruptly closed, leaving their communities’ health, economies, and resident physicians in disarray. Evidence shows that when a private equity firm takes over a hospital, the quality1 of care declines and costs2 for patients rise. Private equity ownership in healthcare also has harmful effects on medical education and the workforce, which is already suffering grave shortages in the US, according to the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis.3 When Hahnemann closed, it left all its resident physicians and first year interns without an accredited programme, including 59 international students who had to find …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More and more US hospitals are being bought by private equity firms. Sudden closures and layoffs are having a devastating effect on resident doctors’ careers, reports Paige Huffman Liz Calhoun was halfway through her three year emergency physician training when she learnt from a text message that her hospital was closing in three months. She and the other 571 resident physicians at Hahnemann University Hospital in Philadelphia did not know how or where they would finish their training. In the end they didn’t have three months to figure it out: the training programme closed 30 days later. Hahnemann, located in the heart of the city, was a “safety net” hospital, meaning that its staff provided care to patients regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay. At the time of its closure in 2019, Hahnemann made headlines as the model for what can go wrong when a profit driven private equity firm takes over a hospital. In the years since, several other hospitals bought by private equity firms have abruptly closed, leaving their communities’ health, economies, and resident physicians in disarray. Evidence shows that when a private equity firm takes over a hospital, the quality1 of care declines and costs2 for patients rise. Private equity ownership in healthcare also has harmful effects on medical education and the workforce, which is already suffering grave shortages in the US, according to the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis.3 When Hahnemann closed, it left all its resident physicians and first year interns without an accredited programme, including 59 international students who had to find …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods Art of “holding patient care in general practice” is key to survival of the NHS Combining medicine and mental health: the consultant old age liaison psychiatrist Near-infrared spectroscopy in perioperative medicine Care guided by tissue oxygenation and haemodynamic monitoring in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (Bottomline-CS): assessor blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1