A bootstrap-assisted methodology for the estimation of prediction uncertainty in multilayer perceptron-based calibration

IF 6 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytica Chimica Acta Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2025.343954
Fabricio A. Chiappini , Mirta R. Alcaraz , Liliana Forzani
{"title":"A bootstrap-assisted methodology for the estimation of prediction uncertainty in multilayer perceptron-based calibration","authors":"Fabricio A. Chiappini ,&nbsp;Mirta R. Alcaraz ,&nbsp;Liliana Forzani","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2025.343954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In calibration, analytical figures of merit (AFOMs) are statistical parameters of great importance for method validation. In recent decades, relevant contributions have been made to estimate AFOMs in many calibration scenarios. However, calculating AFOMs in nonlinear models, like those based on artificial neural networks (ANNs), is still a matter of investigation. In this work, the problem of estimating the prediction uncertainty quantified by the variance (<span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><msub><mover><mi>y</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>u</mi></msub><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math></span>) associated with the prediction of a test sample, in the context of multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based calibration was tackled.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two well-established statistical techniques, i.e., the delta method and the bootstrap, were combined to develop a methodology for variance estimation. Besides, the errors coming from both concentration and spectral variables were taken into account for model formulation. The proof of concept was based on a 95 % confidence interval coverage analysis calculated from multiple simulated nonlinear calibration datasets. The results showed that the delta method is suitable for determining a general variance structure for a nonlinear calibration model, considering errors from both concentrations and instrumental signals. Likewise, the bootstrap has proven to be a powerful tool for estimating model variability, particularly due to its ability to bypass the need for explicit formula derivation, even in the presence of the flexibility that characterizes the MLP.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The proposed strategy was applied to two already published nonlinear experimental datasets modeled by MLP, where the prediction uncertainty was assessed for the first time. This work represents a novel step toward fully characterising ANN-based calibration models. This is urgently needed to improve the analytical results report and facilitate the transfer of new analytical methodologies to the industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":240,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta","volume":"1353 ","pages":"Article 343954"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267025003484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In calibration, analytical figures of merit (AFOMs) are statistical parameters of great importance for method validation. In recent decades, relevant contributions have been made to estimate AFOMs in many calibration scenarios. However, calculating AFOMs in nonlinear models, like those based on artificial neural networks (ANNs), is still a matter of investigation. In this work, the problem of estimating the prediction uncertainty quantified by the variance (σyˆu2) associated with the prediction of a test sample, in the context of multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based calibration was tackled.

Results

Two well-established statistical techniques, i.e., the delta method and the bootstrap, were combined to develop a methodology for variance estimation. Besides, the errors coming from both concentration and spectral variables were taken into account for model formulation. The proof of concept was based on a 95 % confidence interval coverage analysis calculated from multiple simulated nonlinear calibration datasets. The results showed that the delta method is suitable for determining a general variance structure for a nonlinear calibration model, considering errors from both concentrations and instrumental signals. Likewise, the bootstrap has proven to be a powerful tool for estimating model variability, particularly due to its ability to bypass the need for explicit formula derivation, even in the presence of the flexibility that characterizes the MLP.

Significance

The proposed strategy was applied to two already published nonlinear experimental datasets modeled by MLP, where the prediction uncertainty was assessed for the first time. This work represents a novel step toward fully characterising ANN-based calibration models. This is urgently needed to improve the analytical results report and facilitate the transfer of new analytical methodologies to the industry.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多层感知器的校准中预测不确定性估计的自举辅助方法
在校准中,分析值(AFOMs)是方法验证中非常重要的统计参数。近几十年来,在许多校准情景下,对AFOMs的估算做出了相关贡献。然而,在非线性模型(如基于人工神经网络的模型)中计算AFOMs仍然是一个有待研究的问题。本文研究了基于多层感知器(MLP)的校准方法中,由与测试样本预测相关的方差()量化的预测不确定性的估计问题。结果结合两种成熟的统计技术,即delta法和自举法,开发了方差估计的方法。此外,模型的建立还考虑了浓度和光谱两方面的误差。概念验证基于从多个模拟非线性校准数据集计算的95%置信区间覆盖率分析。结果表明,考虑浓度和仪器信号的误差,delta法适用于确定非线性校准模型的一般方差结构。同样,自举法已被证明是估计模型可变性的强大工具,特别是由于它能够绕过显式公式推导的需要,即使在具有MLP特征的灵活性的情况下也是如此。将所提出的策略应用于两个已经发表的非线性实验数据集,并首次评估了预测的不确定性。这项工作代表了完全表征基于人工神经网络的校准模型的新一步。这是迫切需要的,以改善分析结果报告和促进新的分析方法转移到行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytica Chimica Acta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1081
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Analytica Chimica Acta has an open access mirror journal Analytica Chimica Acta: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Analytica Chimica Acta provides a forum for the rapid publication of original research, and critical, comprehensive reviews dealing with all aspects of fundamental and applied modern analytical chemistry. The journal welcomes the submission of research papers which report studies concerning the development of new and significant analytical methodologies. In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and impact of the research and the extent to which it adds to the existing body of knowledge in analytical chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Sandwich-type complex-activated DNA circuit for highly sensitive and versatile detection of protein biomarkers for monitoring bone health Unboxing deep learning models using gradient-based methods — A tutorial Evaluating MXene-doped PEDOT coating on carbon fiber microelectrodes for dual-functional neural interfacing Electrostatic interaction induced enhancement of conductive hydrogel for motion detection and targeted identification of ascorbic acid in sweat Z-scheme WO3/CdS heterojunction-synergized molecularly imprinted photoelectrochemical sensor for ultrasensitive and highly selective detection of gentamicin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1