Landscape Patterns and Drivers of Farmland Evolution in Basin Margin Mountainous Areas—A Case Study of Sichuan Basin, China

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5451
Xiaoxia Yuan, Shaoyao Zhang, Wei Deng, Hao Zhang, Zhanyun Wang, Yuqing He
{"title":"Landscape Patterns and Drivers of Farmland Evolution in Basin Margin Mountainous Areas—A Case Study of Sichuan Basin, China","authors":"Xiaoxia Yuan,&nbsp;Shaoyao Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Deng,&nbsp;Hao Zhang,&nbsp;Zhanyun Wang,&nbsp;Yuqing He","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Rapid urbanization has resulted in increasingly complex and diverse farmland landscape patterns in mountainous areas. The southern margin of Sichuan Basin, noted for its prominent urban–rural-nature gradient, serves as a typical area for analyzing farmland landscape evolution. In this study, an identification system was developed to classify and identify the typology of farmland evolution, including farmland fallow (FF), farmland abandonment (FA), farmland loss (FL), and farmland reclamation (FR). Multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) was employed to analyze the drivers and spatial differentiation mechanisms of farmland evolution. The results revealed the following. (1) The areas of FR (45.39%), FF (29.62%), and FA (21.81%) in the region were relatively large, and the FL area (3.17%) was relatively small. Compared with 2000–2010, the areas of FL and FA increased, and the areas of FF and FR decreased from 2010 to 2020. (2) FL, FR, FA, and FF presented similar landscape patterns during the two periods. FF and FA showed lower fragmentation in lowland plain areas (LPA) compared to mid-high mountainous areas (MHMA). In contrast, FL had higher fragmentation in LPA, while FR had greater fragmentation in low mountainous and hilly areas (LMHA); (3) The landscape pattern and drivers of farmland evolution exhibit clear urban-rural-nature gradients. From the LPA to the MHMA, the dominant farmland evolution typologies are sequentially FL, FR, and FF-FA. Concurrently, the primary driving factors shift from socioeconomic factors (urbanization and policies) to more natural factors (terrain and ecological conservation). This study proposes an integrated framework for managing farmland in mountainous regions, considering regional policy trade-offs and synergies. It can guide the sustainable use and protection of farmland, while supporting rural revitalization and agroecological sustainability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"36 6","pages":"1787-1805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has resulted in increasingly complex and diverse farmland landscape patterns in mountainous areas. The southern margin of Sichuan Basin, noted for its prominent urban–rural-nature gradient, serves as a typical area for analyzing farmland landscape evolution. In this study, an identification system was developed to classify and identify the typology of farmland evolution, including farmland fallow (FF), farmland abandonment (FA), farmland loss (FL), and farmland reclamation (FR). Multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) was employed to analyze the drivers and spatial differentiation mechanisms of farmland evolution. The results revealed the following. (1) The areas of FR (45.39%), FF (29.62%), and FA (21.81%) in the region were relatively large, and the FL area (3.17%) was relatively small. Compared with 2000–2010, the areas of FL and FA increased, and the areas of FF and FR decreased from 2010 to 2020. (2) FL, FR, FA, and FF presented similar landscape patterns during the two periods. FF and FA showed lower fragmentation in lowland plain areas (LPA) compared to mid-high mountainous areas (MHMA). In contrast, FL had higher fragmentation in LPA, while FR had greater fragmentation in low mountainous and hilly areas (LMHA); (3) The landscape pattern and drivers of farmland evolution exhibit clear urban-rural-nature gradients. From the LPA to the MHMA, the dominant farmland evolution typologies are sequentially FL, FR, and FF-FA. Concurrently, the primary driving factors shift from socioeconomic factors (urbanization and policies) to more natural factors (terrain and ecological conservation). This study proposes an integrated framework for managing farmland in mountainous regions, considering regional policy trade-offs and synergies. It can guide the sustainable use and protection of farmland, while supporting rural revitalization and agroecological sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆地边缘山区耕地演变的景观格局与驱动因素——以四川盆地为例
快速城市化导致山区农田景观格局日益复杂多样。四川盆地南缘具有明显的城乡自然梯度,是分析农田景观演变的典型区域。本研究建立了耕地演变类型的分类识别系统,包括耕地休耕(FF)、耕地撂荒(FA)、耕地流失(FL)和耕地复垦(FR)。采用多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)分析了耕地演变的驱动因素和空间分异机制。结果显示如下。(1)区域内FR(45.39%)、FF(29.62%)和FA(21.81%)面积较大,FL(3.17%)面积较小。与2000-2010年相比,2010 - 2020年,林分和林分面积呈上升趋势,林分和林分面积呈下降趋势。(2)高海拔、高海拔、低海拔和高海拔地区在两个时期的景观格局相似。低平原区(LPA)的FF和FA破碎化程度低于中高山区(MHMA)。相比之下,FL在低山丘区(lha)破碎化程度较高,而FR在低山丘区(LMHA)破碎化程度较高;(3)农田景观格局及其演变驱动力呈现明显的城乡自然梯度。从LPA到MHMA,农田演变类型依次为FL、FR和FF-FA。同时,主要驱动因素从社会经济因素(城市化和政策)转向自然因素(地形和生态保护)。本研究提出了一个综合的山区耕地管理框架,考虑了区域政策权衡和协同效应。它可以指导农田的可持续利用和保护,同时支持乡村振兴和农业生态可持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging Forest Resources, Green Energy, and Digitalization: Contextual Evidence Apropos Sustainable Growth in the Lens of Climate Resilience Policies Adoption Dynamics and Economic Benefits of Drought‐Resistant Crops Among Smallholder Farmers in Degraded Ecosystems Distribution Characteristics of Eroded Sediment Particles on Sloping Farmland Containing Gravel Under Simulated Rainfall Conditions Forest Loss and Carbon Flux in Southeast Asia: Spatiotemporal Patterns, Ecological Impacts, and Key Determinants Fresh Straw Clippings as Organic Soil Amendments Quickly Recovered Soil Quality of Farmland by Improving Soil Structure and Soil Hydraulic Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1