Cheryl J Isenhour, Lucia Pawloski, Susan Hariri, Tami H Skoff
{"title":"Trends in commercial laboratory testing and positivity for Bordetella species in the United States, 2019 through 2023.","authors":"Cheryl J Isenhour, Lucia Pawloski, Susan Hariri, Tami H Skoff","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic methods for detecting infections caused by Bordetella species include culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and serology. As the epidemiology of pertussis continues to evolve in the United States, we aimed to assess recent trends in provider testing practices and positivity for both B. pertussis and B. parapertussis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using deidentified data from a large U.S. commercial laboratory, we identified Bordetella tests from 2019 through 2023. We described monthly trends in number of tests ordered by test type for culture, PCR (both non-panel B. pertussis and B. parapertussis tests and those included as part of a respiratory panel), and serology, as well as percent positivity for serology and PCR. We also examined orders and positivity by patient age group and geographic region of the ordering provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 527,206 tests, we identified 316,428 (60.1%) PCR tests, 204,480 (38.8%) serologic tests, and 5,840 (1.1%) cultures. While most PCR tests were ordered as part of a respiratory panel (83.5%), only 215 (0.08%) were positive for B. pertussis. Non-panel PCR positivity for B. pertussis was substantially higher but variable over the study period, ranging from 3% to 16%. We also observed a notable increase in B. parapertussis positivity on non-panel PCR tests in the first half of 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both PCR and serology remain preferred diagnostic methods for providers. Despite their increasing popularity, B. pertussis positivity remained low for respiratory panels. Data from commercial laboratories can provide crucial insights into pertussis diagnostic trends over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic methods for detecting infections caused by Bordetella species include culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and serology. As the epidemiology of pertussis continues to evolve in the United States, we aimed to assess recent trends in provider testing practices and positivity for both B. pertussis and B. parapertussis.
Methods: Using deidentified data from a large U.S. commercial laboratory, we identified Bordetella tests from 2019 through 2023. We described monthly trends in number of tests ordered by test type for culture, PCR (both non-panel B. pertussis and B. parapertussis tests and those included as part of a respiratory panel), and serology, as well as percent positivity for serology and PCR. We also examined orders and positivity by patient age group and geographic region of the ordering provider.
Results: Among 527,206 tests, we identified 316,428 (60.1%) PCR tests, 204,480 (38.8%) serologic tests, and 5,840 (1.1%) cultures. While most PCR tests were ordered as part of a respiratory panel (83.5%), only 215 (0.08%) were positive for B. pertussis. Non-panel PCR positivity for B. pertussis was substantially higher but variable over the study period, ranging from 3% to 16%. We also observed a notable increase in B. parapertussis positivity on non-panel PCR tests in the first half of 2023.
Conclusions: Both PCR and serology remain preferred diagnostic methods for providers. Despite their increasing popularity, B. pertussis positivity remained low for respiratory panels. Data from commercial laboratories can provide crucial insights into pertussis diagnostic trends over time.
期刊介绍:
Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.