Hypertonic saline/dextran versus lactated Ringer's treatment for hemorrhage in dehydrated swine.

Circulatory shock Pub Date : 1994-12-01
M D McKirnan, R L Williams, U Limjoco, J Ragland, C G Gray
{"title":"Hypertonic saline/dextran versus lactated Ringer's treatment for hemorrhage in dehydrated swine.","authors":"M D McKirnan,&nbsp;R L Williams,&nbsp;U Limjoco,&nbsp;J Ragland,&nbsp;C G Gray","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the efficacy of low-volume resuscitation in dehydrated subjects, 7.5% hypertonic saline/6% dextran 70 (HSD) and lactated Ringer's (LR) treatments were compared in conscious pigs dehydrated for 48 hr prior to a 37% blood volume hemorrhage. Pigs randomized to treatment were resuscitated with equivalent sodium loads of either HSD (4 ml/kg) or LR (33.3 ml/kg) following the 60-min hemorrhage. Dehydration resulted in a 7-8% body weight loss. Mortality through 180 min of recovery was 1/13 (7.7%) for HSD, 1/11 (9.1%) for LR, and 4/8 (50%) for a group of dehydrated and untreated controls (DC). HSD and LR solutions elicited similar heart rate, cardiac output, arterial pressure, and oxygen transport responses in the recovery period following hemorrhage and resuscitation. HSD was as effective as LR in expanding plasma volume in dehydrated hemorrhaged pigs. Serum chemistries provided no evidence for a sustained systemic toxicity from HSD treatment. These findings support low-volume HSD resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in moderately dehydrated subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10280,"journal":{"name":"Circulatory shock","volume":"44 4","pages":"238-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulatory shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of low-volume resuscitation in dehydrated subjects, 7.5% hypertonic saline/6% dextran 70 (HSD) and lactated Ringer's (LR) treatments were compared in conscious pigs dehydrated for 48 hr prior to a 37% blood volume hemorrhage. Pigs randomized to treatment were resuscitated with equivalent sodium loads of either HSD (4 ml/kg) or LR (33.3 ml/kg) following the 60-min hemorrhage. Dehydration resulted in a 7-8% body weight loss. Mortality through 180 min of recovery was 1/13 (7.7%) for HSD, 1/11 (9.1%) for LR, and 4/8 (50%) for a group of dehydrated and untreated controls (DC). HSD and LR solutions elicited similar heart rate, cardiac output, arterial pressure, and oxygen transport responses in the recovery period following hemorrhage and resuscitation. HSD was as effective as LR in expanding plasma volume in dehydrated hemorrhaged pigs. Serum chemistries provided no evidence for a sustained systemic toxicity from HSD treatment. These findings support low-volume HSD resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in moderately dehydrated subjects.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高渗盐水/右旋糖酐与乳酸林格治疗脱水猪出血的比较。
为了确定低容量复苏对脱水受试者的效果,在37%血容量出血前脱水48小时的清醒猪中,比较7.5%高渗生理盐水/6%葡聚糖70 (HSD)和乳酸林格(LR)治疗。随机分配到治疗组的猪在出血60分钟后用等量钠负荷HSD (4 ml/kg)或LR (33.3 ml/kg)进行复苏。脱水导致体重减少7-8%。恢复180分钟后,HSD的死亡率为1/13 (7.7%),LR的死亡率为1/11(9.1%),而脱水和未经治疗的对照组(DC)的死亡率为4/8(50%)。在出血和复苏后的恢复期,HSD和LR溶液引起相似的心率、心输出量、动脉压和氧转运反应。HSD在扩大脱水出血猪血浆容量方面与LR一样有效。血清化学没有证据表明HSD治疗有持续的全身毒性。这些发现支持小容量HSD复苏失血性休克在中度脱水受试者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of binding specificity and the function of two human IgM anti-lipid A monoclonal antibodies. Hypertonic saline/dextran versus lactated Ringer's treatment for hemorrhage in dehydrated swine. Lysozyme regulates LPS-induced interleukin-6 release in mice. Liver oxygen uptake dependence and mitochondrial function in septic rats. Efficacy of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in endotoxic shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1