{"title":"Smooth or rough? The impact of food packaging design on product healthiness perception","authors":"Minjing Peng, Funing Liang, Lidan Yu, Haiyang Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the existing literature, the relationship between the roughness/smoothness of food packaging surfaces and healthiness perception has not been persuasively concluded. To fill this gap, we combined two objective methods to investigate the effect of smooth/rough packaging on food healthiness perception: Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) and Event-Related Potential (ERP). The results of the BIAT demonstrated that participants needed a longer time to make decisions in the block of rough packaging and healthy food (RH task) and the D score was 0.22. Consumers unconsciously perceived the block of smooth packaging and healthy food (SH task) as having a stronger intrinsic association than the RH task. Furthermore, the more positive amplitude trend of the P300 component and the more negative amplitude trend of the late negative component (LNC) were induced in the SH task relative to the RH task. The results of the ERP proved that consumers perceived food inside smooth packaging to be healthier. The findings of this study can guide the design of packaging for healthy foods, and manufacturers should make the surface of food packaging smoother or rougher when appropriate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 104970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329323001647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In the existing literature, the relationship between the roughness/smoothness of food packaging surfaces and healthiness perception has not been persuasively concluded. To fill this gap, we combined two objective methods to investigate the effect of smooth/rough packaging on food healthiness perception: Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) and Event-Related Potential (ERP). The results of the BIAT demonstrated that participants needed a longer time to make decisions in the block of rough packaging and healthy food (RH task) and the D score was 0.22. Consumers unconsciously perceived the block of smooth packaging and healthy food (SH task) as having a stronger intrinsic association than the RH task. Furthermore, the more positive amplitude trend of the P300 component and the more negative amplitude trend of the late negative component (LNC) were induced in the SH task relative to the RH task. The results of the ERP proved that consumers perceived food inside smooth packaging to be healthier. The findings of this study can guide the design of packaging for healthy foods, and manufacturers should make the surface of food packaging smoother or rougher when appropriate.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.