Smooth or rough? The impact of food packaging design on product healthiness perception

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104970
Minjing Peng, Funing Liang, Lidan Yu, Haiyang Huang
{"title":"Smooth or rough? The impact of food packaging design on product healthiness perception","authors":"Minjing Peng,&nbsp;Funing Liang,&nbsp;Lidan Yu,&nbsp;Haiyang Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the existing literature, the relationship between the roughness/smoothness of food packaging surfaces and healthiness perception has not been persuasively concluded. To fill this gap, we combined two objective methods to investigate the effect of smooth/rough packaging on food healthiness perception: Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) and Event-Related Potential (ERP). The results of the BIAT demonstrated that participants needed a longer time to make decisions in the block of rough packaging and healthy food (RH task) and the D score was 0.22. Consumers unconsciously perceived the block of smooth packaging and healthy food (SH task) as having a stronger intrinsic association than the RH task. Furthermore, the more positive amplitude trend of the P300 component and the more negative amplitude trend of the late negative component (LNC) were induced in the SH task relative to the RH task. The results of the ERP proved that consumers perceived food inside smooth packaging to be healthier. The findings of this study can guide the design of packaging for healthy foods, and manufacturers should make the surface of food packaging smoother or rougher when appropriate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 104970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329323001647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the existing literature, the relationship between the roughness/smoothness of food packaging surfaces and healthiness perception has not been persuasively concluded. To fill this gap, we combined two objective methods to investigate the effect of smooth/rough packaging on food healthiness perception: Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) and Event-Related Potential (ERP). The results of the BIAT demonstrated that participants needed a longer time to make decisions in the block of rough packaging and healthy food (RH task) and the D score was 0.22. Consumers unconsciously perceived the block of smooth packaging and healthy food (SH task) as having a stronger intrinsic association than the RH task. Furthermore, the more positive amplitude trend of the P300 component and the more negative amplitude trend of the late negative component (LNC) were induced in the SH task relative to the RH task. The results of the ERP proved that consumers perceived food inside smooth packaging to be healthier. The findings of this study can guide the design of packaging for healthy foods, and manufacturers should make the surface of food packaging smoother or rougher when appropriate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平滑还是粗糙?食品包装设计对产品健康感知的影响
在现有的文献中,食品包装表面的粗糙度/光滑度与健康感知之间的关系尚未得到令人信服的结论。为了填补这一空白,我们结合了两种客观的方法来研究光滑/粗糙包装对食品健康感知的影响:简要内隐联想测试(BIAT)和事件相关电位(ERP)。BIAT结果表明,受试者在粗糙包装和健康食品(RH任务)中需要更长的时间来做出决定,D得分为0.22。消费者无意识地认为光滑包装和健康食品(SH任务)比RH任务具有更强的内在联系。此外,相对于RH任务,SH任务诱发了P300分量的更正振幅趋势和后期负分量(LNC)的更负振幅趋势。ERP的结果证明,消费者认为光滑包装内的食品更健康。本研究的结果可以指导健康食品包装的设计,制造商应该在适当的时候使食品包装表面更光滑或更粗糙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board What differentiates the choice of certain foods? An exploratory analysis of food choice patterns among couples from the dyadic NutriAct Family Cohort in relation to social and health-associated determinants Parental norms and attitudes in Relation to Children’s sugar consumption − A mediation analysis of the “Are You Too Sweet?” intervention study Impact of olfactory priming on mental representations of food concepts and subsequent food choice Animal welfare has priority: Swiss consumers’ preferences for animal welfare, greenhouse gas reductions and other sustainability improvements in dairy products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1