Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a "real world" study.

E Mossello, E Tonon, V Caleri, S Tilli, C Cantini, M C Cavallini, F Bencini, R Mecacci, M Marini, F Bardelli, E Sarcone, E Razzi, C A Biagini, G Masotti
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a \"real world\" study.","authors":"E Mossello,&nbsp;E Tonon,&nbsp;V Caleri,&nbsp;S Tilli,&nbsp;C Cantini,&nbsp;M C Cavallini,&nbsp;F Bencini,&nbsp;R Mecacci,&nbsp;M Marini,&nbsp;F Bardelli,&nbsp;E Sarcone,&nbsp;E Razzi,&nbsp;C A Biagini,&nbsp;G Masotti","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) in improving cognitive status and disability in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known about the effectiveness of ChEI in clinical practice, and no large clinical trials comparing different ChEI are available at present. Aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of ChEI in a sample of elderly outpatients diagnosed with mild to moderate AD. We selected 407 subjects for ChEI treatment (donepezil,rivastigmine or galantamine). Their cognitive function was evaluated by means of the mini mental state examination (MMSE), and the global functional status was estimated by using the activities of daily living (ADL) and the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales at baseline (To), then after 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 9 months (T3), respectively. T3 follow-up was completed by 212 subjects. The patients were considered as responders (R), if the MMSEscore at T2 was unchanged or improved, if compared to that of T0. In 35 patients (8.6 %)treatment was withdrawn because of mostly gastrointestinal adverse events. Compared to the other drugs, donepezil was associated with a lower incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events. Subjects who completed T3 follow-up (age 78 +/- 6 years, MMSE scores 18.8 +/- 3.9) showed an increase at T2 of 0.7 +/- 2.7 (p = 0.001) and a decrease at T3 of -0.6 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.008) in the MMSE scores, as compared to To . The ADL and IADL scores did not show significant changes at T2; however, both decreased significantly at T3. The patients Rat-T2 showed a better cognitive and functional outcome at T3 , compared to the nonresponders(NR-at-T2), displaying values of MMSE R-at-T2 0.4 +/- 3.1 vs. NR-at-T2 -3.0 +/- 2.5, p = 0.001, and ADL values of -0.3 +/- 1.2 vs. -0.7 +/- 1.3, p = 0.03, respectively. No significant difference was found in the changes of MMSE scores between donepezil and rivastigmine (galantamine was not included in the comparison due to the small number of treated subjects). In conclusion, in this sample of elderly subjects with mild to moderate AD,treated with ChEI, a small but significant decline in cognitive and functional status was observed after 9 months. Subjects who showed a good response to treatment after 3 months, had a better cognitive and functional outcome at 9 months. No significant difference in cognitive outcome was found between drugs, while donepezil was better tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":77833,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.040","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) in improving cognitive status and disability in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known about the effectiveness of ChEI in clinical practice, and no large clinical trials comparing different ChEI are available at present. Aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of ChEI in a sample of elderly outpatients diagnosed with mild to moderate AD. We selected 407 subjects for ChEI treatment (donepezil,rivastigmine or galantamine). Their cognitive function was evaluated by means of the mini mental state examination (MMSE), and the global functional status was estimated by using the activities of daily living (ADL) and the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales at baseline (To), then after 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 9 months (T3), respectively. T3 follow-up was completed by 212 subjects. The patients were considered as responders (R), if the MMSEscore at T2 was unchanged or improved, if compared to that of T0. In 35 patients (8.6 %)treatment was withdrawn because of mostly gastrointestinal adverse events. Compared to the other drugs, donepezil was associated with a lower incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events. Subjects who completed T3 follow-up (age 78 +/- 6 years, MMSE scores 18.8 +/- 3.9) showed an increase at T2 of 0.7 +/- 2.7 (p = 0.001) and a decrease at T3 of -0.6 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.008) in the MMSE scores, as compared to To . The ADL and IADL scores did not show significant changes at T2; however, both decreased significantly at T3. The patients Rat-T2 showed a better cognitive and functional outcome at T3 , compared to the nonresponders(NR-at-T2), displaying values of MMSE R-at-T2 0.4 +/- 3.1 vs. NR-at-T2 -3.0 +/- 2.5, p = 0.001, and ADL values of -0.3 +/- 1.2 vs. -0.7 +/- 1.3, p = 0.03, respectively. No significant difference was found in the changes of MMSE scores between donepezil and rivastigmine (galantamine was not included in the comparison due to the small number of treated subjects). In conclusion, in this sample of elderly subjects with mild to moderate AD,treated with ChEI, a small but significant decline in cognitive and functional status was observed after 9 months. Subjects who showed a good response to treatment after 3 months, had a better cognitive and functional outcome at 9 months. No significant difference in cognitive outcome was found between drugs, while donepezil was better tolerated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年阿尔茨海默病患者胆碱酯酶抑制剂的有效性和安全性:一项“真实世界”研究
临床试验已经证明胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEI)在改善轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的认知状态和残疾方面的疗效。然而,关于ChEI在临床实践中的有效性知之甚少,目前也没有比较不同ChEI的大型临床试验。本研究的目的是评估ChEI在诊断为轻中度AD的老年门诊患者中的安全性和有效性。我们选择了407名受试者进行ChEI治疗(多奈哌齐、利瓦斯汀或加兰他明)。采用mini mental state examination (MMSE)评估患者的认知功能,在基线(To)、1个月(T1)、3个月(T2)和9个月(T3)后分别采用日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)量表评估患者的整体功能状态。212名受试者完成T3随访。与T0相比,如果T2时mmsscore不变或改善,则认为患者有反应(R)。在35例(8.6%)患者中,由于主要是胃肠道不良事件而停止治疗。与其他药物相比,多奈哌齐因不良事件引起的停药发生率较低。完成T3随访的受试者(年龄78 +/- 6岁,MMSE评分18.8 +/- 3.9)与to相比,T2时MMSE评分增加0.7 +/- 2.7 (p = 0.001), T3时MMSE评分下降-0.6 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.008)。T2时ADL和IADL评分无明显变化;但在T3时,两者均显著下降。与无应答者(NR-at-T2)相比,大鼠- t2患者在T3时表现出更好的认知和功能结局,MMSE R-at-T2值为0.4 +/- 3.1,而NR-at-T2值为3.0 +/- 2.5,p = 0.001, ADL值为-0.3 +/- 1.2,p = 0.03。多奈哌齐与利瓦斯汀的MMSE评分变化无显著差异(加兰他明因治疗对象少,未纳入比较)。总之,在接受ChEI治疗的轻度至中度老年AD患者样本中,9个月后观察到认知和功能状态虽小但明显下降。3个月后对治疗反应良好的受试者,在9个月时有更好的认知和功能结果。两种药物在认知预后方面无显著差异,而多奈哌齐耐受性较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a "real world" study. Assessment of the health status in the Massa Lombarda cohort: a preliminary description of the program evaluating cardio-cerebro-vascular disease risk factors and quality of life in an elderly population. Unconventional affective symptoms and executive functions after stroke in the elderly. Sleep disturbances in elderly: a subjective evaluation over 65. Prevalence of delirium in a geriatric convalescence hospitalization unit: patient's clinical characteristics and risk precipitating factor analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1