{"title":"Screening individuals with intellectual disability for psychiatric disorders: comparison of four measures.","authors":"Even Myrbakk, Stephen von Tetzchner","doi":"10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[54:SIWIDF]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Convergences and divergences between four of the most commonly used checklists for psychiatric disorders (the Reiss Screen, The Mini PAS-ADD, the DASH-II, and the ADD) were examined. We screened 181 individuals with intellectual disability for psychiatric disorders with the four checklists and compared the results on the checklists. The concordance of the overall scores on the four checklists was high; but the agreement on specific psychiatric disorders was limited. The results indicate that the checklists are useful as general indicators of psychiatric disorders, but are of less value for specifying the nature of the disorders in individuals with intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":76991,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","volume":"113 1","pages":"54-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[54:SIWIDF]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[54:SIWIDF]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
Abstract
Convergences and divergences between four of the most commonly used checklists for psychiatric disorders (the Reiss Screen, The Mini PAS-ADD, the DASH-II, and the ADD) were examined. We screened 181 individuals with intellectual disability for psychiatric disorders with the four checklists and compared the results on the checklists. The concordance of the overall scores on the four checklists was high; but the agreement on specific psychiatric disorders was limited. The results indicate that the checklists are useful as general indicators of psychiatric disorders, but are of less value for specifying the nature of the disorders in individuals with intellectual disability.
研究了四种最常用的精神疾病检查表(Reiss Screen, Mini PAS-ADD, DASH-II和ADD)之间的一致性和差异性。我们用这四种检查表筛选了181名智力残疾的精神障碍患者,并比较了检查表上的结果。四种量表总体得分的一致性较高;但在特定精神疾病方面的共识是有限的。结果表明,检查表作为精神疾病的一般指标是有用的,但对于指定智力残疾个体的疾病性质的价值较低。