Executive Function Features in Drug-naive Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder.

Manfei Xu, Wenqing Jiang, Yasong DU, Yan Li, Juan Fan
{"title":"Executive Function Features in Drug-naive Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder.","authors":"Manfei Xu,&nbsp;Wenqing Jiang,&nbsp;Yasong DU,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Juan Fan","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) that is characterized by markedly defiant, disobedient, and disruptive behavior in younger children has been regarded as disruptive behavior disorder (DBD), together with conduct disorder (CD). However, in contrast to CD, ODD does not include severe aggressive or antisocial behavior.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to examine executive function (EF) features of children with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross sectional design was used in this study. The EF of children with ODD and pure attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared with children without a psychiatric disorder, using the Stroop Color-Word Tests A and B, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Fourth Edition; WISC-IV), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) corrected for age. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for EF deficits characteristic of ODD and ADHD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ODD group exhibited significantly lower scores in both Stroop Color-Word Tests, the backwards digital span of the WISC-IV, and the categories completed and perseverative responses of the WCST, and significantly higher scores in spatial working memory (SWM) between errors, and the strategy in SWM of the CANTAB compared with the control group. When the ODD group was designated as 1 and the ADHD group was designated as 0, digital span (X1) fit the regression equation very well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with ODD perform substantially worse in EF tasks. Responsive inhibition appears to be uniquely associated with ODD development, while responsive inhibition and working memory appear to be associated with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"29 4","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/6a/sap-29-228.PMC5608995.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) that is characterized by markedly defiant, disobedient, and disruptive behavior in younger children has been regarded as disruptive behavior disorder (DBD), together with conduct disorder (CD). However, in contrast to CD, ODD does not include severe aggressive or antisocial behavior.

Aim: This study aimed to examine executive function (EF) features of children with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).

Methods: Cross sectional design was used in this study. The EF of children with ODD and pure attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared with children without a psychiatric disorder, using the Stroop Color-Word Tests A and B, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Fourth Edition; WISC-IV), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) corrected for age. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for EF deficits characteristic of ODD and ADHD.

Results: The ODD group exhibited significantly lower scores in both Stroop Color-Word Tests, the backwards digital span of the WISC-IV, and the categories completed and perseverative responses of the WCST, and significantly higher scores in spatial working memory (SWM) between errors, and the strategy in SWM of the CANTAB compared with the control group. When the ODD group was designated as 1 and the ADHD group was designated as 0, digital span (X1) fit the regression equation very well.

Conclusions: Children with ODD perform substantially worse in EF tasks. Responsive inhibition appears to be uniquely associated with ODD development, while responsive inhibition and working memory appear to be associated with ADHD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未用药儿童对立违抗性障碍的执行功能特征。
背景:对立违抗性障碍(ODD)在幼儿中表现为明显的违抗性、不服从性和破坏性行为,与品行障碍(CD)一起被认为是破坏性行为障碍(DBD)。然而,与CD相比,ODD不包括严重的攻击或反社会行为。目的:探讨对立违抗性障碍(ODD)儿童的执行功能(EF)特征。方法:采用横断面设计。采用《儿童韦氏智力量表(第四版)》、《Stroop色字测验a、B》和《儿童智力量表》对ODD和单纯注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患儿的EF与无精神障碍患儿进行比较;威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)和剑桥神经心理测试自动电池(CANTAB)。进行Logistic回归分析,以确定ODD和ADHD特征的EF缺陷的危险因素。结果:与对照组相比,ODD组在Stroop颜色-单词测试、wiscc - iv的向后数字广度、WCST的完成类别和持续性反应方面得分显著降低,而在CANTAB的错误间空间工作记忆(SWM)和SWM策略方面得分显著提高。当ODD组设为1,ADHD组设为0时,数字跨度(X1)很好地拟合回归方程。结论:ODD患儿在EF任务中的表现明显较差。反应性抑制似乎与ODD的发展有独特的联系,而反应性抑制和工作记忆似乎与多动症有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Research Progress in Biological Studies of Schizophrenia in China in 2017. An Association Study on the Cognitive Function and the Cerebral Grey Matter Volume of Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia. A Comparison Study of Working Memory Deficits between Patients with Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Patients with Schizophrenia. Comparison of Olanzapine versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Improvement of Insight and Medication Discontinuation Rate in Schizophrenia. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1